Chinese-driven frontier expansion in the Amazon: four axes of pressure caused by the growing demand for soy trade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2020.1.34656Keywords:
Amazon. Agricultural frontiers. Deforestation. Soy. Chinese demand.Abstract
Chinese demand for the world’s commodities has the capacity to shape agricultural frontiers in many parts of the world, including the Amazon. This article is a preliminary report on findings concerning the expansion of the agricultural frontier in the Brazilian Amazon driven by increases in soybean production, extension of cropped area, cross-referenced with satellite data on deforestation rates at the smallest possible scale: the municipal level. The study identifies 21 municipalities forming fours axes of frontier expansion in the Amazon, where soycrops may be the cause for displacement deforestation, as it is the case of cattle ranching. Despite the Soy Moratorium, frontiers in the Amazon keep shifting. The article advocates that further research in those four axes is needed to better understand the relationship between those two industries in terms of land use as well as the socio-environmental on the ground impacts. Furthermore, the connections between those areas with present and future infrastructure development in the Amazon, many counting with direct Chinese investment, will be key to the expansion of the soy value chain, bypassing the initial goal of zero-deforestation.
Downloads
References
Arima, Eugenio Y., Richards Peter, Robert Walker and Marcellus M. Caldas. 2011. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 6 (2): 024010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010.
Assis, Wendell Ficher T. 2010. Conflitos territoriais e disputas cartográficas: tramas sociopolíticas no ordenamento territorial do oeste do Pará. In Cartografia social e dinâmicas territoriais: marcos para o debate, organizado por Henri Acselrad, 163-193. Rio de Janeiro, Ippur-UFRJ. Accessed on: july 17, 2018. http://beu.extension.unicen.edu.ar/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/347/ACSELRAD%20%28coord%29_2010_cartografia%20social%20e%20din%-C3%A2micas%20territoriais.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Barona, Elizabeth, Navin Ramankutty, Glenn Hyman and Oliver T Coomes. 2010. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5, n. 2: 024002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002.
Brondizio, Eduardo S. and Emilio F. Moran. 2008. Human dimensions of climate change: the vulnerability of small farmers in the Amazon. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences 363 (1498): 1803-1809. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0025.
Cabral, Eugênia Rosa e Sérgio Castro Gomes. 2013. Gestão ambiental pública em municípios com forte correlação entre desmatamento e expansão da pecuária, soja e madeira. Ensaios FEE 34, n. 1: 167 - 194. Accessed on: june 21 2019. https://revistas.fee.tche.br/index.php/ensaios/article/view/2592/3154.
Cavalcanti, Iracema F. de Albuquerque, Nelson Jesus Ferreira, Maria Gertrudes Alvarez Justi da Silva e Maria Assunção Faus da Silva Dias (orgs). 2016. Tempo e clima no Brasil. São Paulo: Oficina de textos.
Fearnside, Philip M., Adriano M. R. Figueiredo e Sandra C. M. Bonjour. 2013. Amazonian forest loss and the long reach of China’s influence. Environment, Development and Sustainability 15, n. 2: 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9412-2.
Fearnside, Philip Martin. 2004. A água de São Paulo e a floresta amazônica. Accessed on: mai 09, 2019. http:// repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/123/5902.
Castrillon Fernández, Antonio João. 2007. Do cerrado à Amazônia: as estruturas sociais da economia da soja em Mato Grosso. Tese em Desenvolvimento Rural, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.
Gibbs, Holly, Lisa Rausch, John Munger and Ian H Schelly, Douglas C. Morton, Praveen Noojipady, Britaldo S.Soares Filho, Paulo Barreto, Laurent Micol and Nathalie F. Walker. 2015. Environment and development. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Science 347, n. 6220: 377-378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181.
Hargrave, Jorge and Kis-Katos, Krisztina. 2013. Economic causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: a panel data analysis for the 2000s. Environmental and Resource Economics 54, n. 4: 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9610-2.
Hecht, Susanna B. and Alexander Cockburn. 2010. The fate of the forest: developers, destroyers, and defenders of the Amazon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226322735.001.0001.
Hutyra, Lucy R., J. William Munger, Carlos. A. Nobre, Scott. R. Saleska, Simone A. Vieira and Steven C. Wofsy. 2005. Climatic variability and vegetation vulnerability in Amazonia. Geophysical Research Letters 32, n. 24: 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024981.
Kirby, Kathryn R., William F. Laurance, Ana Luisa Albernaz and Götz Schroth. 2006. The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Futures 38, n. 4: 432-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.011.
Kohlhepp, Gerd. 2002. Conflitos de interesse no ordenamento territorial da Amazônia brasileira. Estudos avançados 16, n. 45: 37-61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142002000200004.
Marengo, Jose Antonio e Lincoln M. Alves. 2015. Crise hídrica em São Paulo em 2014: seca e desmatamento. Geousp: espaço e tempo 19, n. 3: 485-494. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2179-0892.geousp.2015.100879.
Moran, Emilio F. 2016. Roads and dams: infrastructure- -driven transformations in the Brazilian Amazon. Ambiente & Sociedade 19, n. 2: 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC256V1922016.
Nepstad, Daniel C., Claudia M. Stickler and Oriana T. Almeida. 2006. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: opportunities for conservation. Conservation biology 20, n. 6: 1595-1603.
Nepstad, Daniel, David G. McGrath, Claudia Stickler, Ane Alencar, Andrea Azevedo, Briana Swette, Tathiana Bezerra et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344, n. 6188: 1118-1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525.
Nobre, Antonio Donato. 2014. O futuro climático da Amazônia. Relatório de avaliação científica. São José dos Campos: CPTEC- eINPE. Accessed on: june 20, 2019. http://www.ccst.inpe.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Futuro-Climatico-da-Amazonia.pdf.
Oliveira, Cyntia Meireles de e Antônio Cordeiro de Santana. 2012. A governança no arranjo produtivo de grãos de Santarém e Belterra, estado do Pará: uma análise a partir do grão soja. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 50, n. 4: 683-704. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032012000400006.
Richards, Peter D., Robert J. Myers, Scott M. Swinton, and Robert T. Walker. 2012. Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America. Global environmental change 22, n. 2: 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.004.
Rudorff, Bernardo Friedrich Theodor, Marcos Adami, Daniela Alves Aguiar, Maurício Alves Moreira, Marurício Pupin Mello, Leandro Fabiani, Daniel Furlan Amaral and Bernardo Machado Pires. 2011. The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sensing 3, n. 1: 185-202. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3010185.
Salati, E. e Vose, P. B. 1984. Amazon Basin: a system in equilibrium. Science 225: 129-138.
Salazar, Luis F., Carlos A. Nobre and Marcos D. Oyama. 2007. Climate change consequences on the biome distribution in tropical South America. Geophysical Research Letters 34, n. 9, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029695.
Sauer, Sérgio e José Paulo Pietrafesa. 2013. Novas fronteiras agrícolas na Amazônia: expansão da soja como expressão das agroestratégias no Pará. Acta Geografica 245-264. https://doi.org/10.5654/actageo2013.0003.0013.
Souza, Geraldo da Silva, Eliseu Alves, Eliane Gonçalves Gomes, Rosaura Gazzola e Renner Marra . 2007. Substituição de culturas. Uma abordagem empírica envolvendo cana-de-açúcar, soja, carne bovina e milho. Revista de Política Agrícola 16, n. 2: 5-13. Accessed on: mai 20, 2019. https://seer.sede.embrapa.br/index.php/RPA/article/view/453/404.
Urban, Frauke, Giles Mohan and Sarah Cook. 2013. China as a new shaper of international development: the environmental implications. Environment, development and sustainabilit 15, n. 2: 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9411-3.
Walker, Robert, Emilio Moran and Luc Anselin. 2000. Deforestation and cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: external capital and household processes. World development 28, n. 4: 683-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00149-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).
