An advocacy coalition analysis of the game RapeLay
The regulation of sexual violence and virtual pornography in Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2020.2.30279Keywords:
Virtual pornography, Lolicon, Japan, Pop cultureAbstract
The Advocacy Coalition Framework provides an efficient lens to analyze a complex subsystem concerning the controversial issue of fictitious depictions of children and rape fantasies in games, especially a game released in Japan called RapeLay. There are two opposing coalitions in Japan: the “children protection coalition” and the “pro status quo coalition”. Each group seeks to influence people to either change or to maintain the current non-criminalization of these products. This article analyzes how these coalitions are bound together and whether they are efficient.
Downloads
References
Allison, Anne. 2006. Permitted and prohibited desires: mothers, comics, and censorship in Japan. Los Angeles: University of California.
Azuma, Hiroki. 2009. Otaku: Japan’s database animals. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis.
Birkland, Thomas A. 2011. An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. New York: Routledge.
Cheok, Adrian David and Owen Noel Newton Fernando. 2012 Kawaii/cute interactive media. Universal Access in the Information Society 11 (3): 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0249-5.
Galbraith, Patrick W. 2011. Fujoshi: fantasy play and transgressive intimacy among “rotten girls” in contemporary Japan. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 37 (1): 219-240. https://doi.org/10.1086/660182.
Galbraith, Patrick.2015. ‘Otaku research’ and anxiety about failed men. In Debating Otaku in contemporary Japan: historical perspectives and new horizons, edited by Patrick W. Galbraith, Thiam Huat Kam and Björn-Ole Kamm. London: Bloomsbury.
Galbraith, Patrick. 2017. Rapelay and the return of the sex wars in Japan. Porn Studies 4 (1): 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2016.1252159
Gutiérrez, Enrique Javier Díez. 2014. Video games and gender-based violence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 132: 58 – 64.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.278
Heng, Yee-Kuang. 2014. Beyond ‘kawaii’ pop culture: Japan’s normative soft power as global trouble-shooter. The Pacific Review 27 (2): 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.882391
Hinton, Perry R. 2014. The cultural context and the interpretation of japanese ‘Lolita complex’ style anime. Intercultural Communication Studies 23 (2):54-68.
Jones, Matthew T. 2005.The impact of telepresence on cultural transmission through bishoujo games. PsychNology Journal 3 (3): 292 – 311.
Kagami, Hiroyuki. 2010. Hijitsuzai seishōnen ron: otaku to shihonshugi [on non-existent youth: otaku and capitalism]. Tokyo: Ai’ikusha.
Kam, Thiam Huat. 2013. The anxieties that make the ‘otaku’: capital and the common sense of consumption in contemporary Japan. Japanese Studies 33: 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2013.768336
Katō, Takayuki. 2008. Sei hyōgen kisei no genkai: `Waisetsu' gainen to sono kisei konkyo. Kyōto: Mineruvu Ashobō.
Kawasaki, Kenichi. 2007. Tokyo pop culture as a transformative culture. Journal of Global Media Studies 1: 17-29.
Kinsella, Sharron. 1995. Cutes in Japan. In Women, media and consumption in Japan, edited by Lise Skov and Brian Moeran. London: Curzon Press.
Kinsella, Sharron. 1998. Japanese subculture in the 1990s: otaku and the amateur manga movement. Journal of Japanese Studies 24 (2): 289-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/133236
Lamarre, Thomas. 2013. Cool, creepy, moé: otaku fictions, discourses, and policies. Diversité Urbaine 13(1): 131-152. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024714ar.
Mathews, Chris. 2011. Manga, virtual child pornography, and censorship in Japan. In Applied ethics: old wine in new bottles?, edited by Center of applied ethics and philosophy Hokkaido University. Sapporo: Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy.
Mclelland, Mark. 2015. Sex, censorship and media regulation in Japan: a historical overview. In Routledge Handbook of Sexuality Studies in East Asia, edited by Mark McLelland and Vera Mackie. Oxford: Routledge.
Nakasatomi, Hiroshi. 2009. Reipurei mondai no keii to hou kaisei no kadai [Problems concerning “rapeplay” and the challenges for legal reform]. Poruno/kaishun mondai kenkyuu kai: Ronbun/shiryou shuu 9:21-43.
Okano, Michiko. 2014. A estética kawaii: origem e diálogo. Anais do Encontro Internacional de Pesquisadores em Arte Oriental. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 1: 288-307.
Saito, Tamaki. 2013. Beautiful fighting girl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shibata, Tomo. 2008. Undoing sexual objectification in the Japanese socio-juridical context: the human-rights-oriented transmutation of the conception of ‘obscene’ material. International Journal of Japanese Sociology 17(1): 114-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6781.2008.00115.x
Shigematsu, Setsu. 1999. Dimensions of desire: sex, fantasy, and fetish in japanese comics. In Themes and issues in asian cartooning: cute, cheap, mad, and sexy, edited by John A. Lent. Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
Takeuchi, Cory Lyn. 2015. Regulating lolicon: toward japanese compliance with its international legal obligations to ban virtual child pornography. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 44:195-236.
Taylor, Emily. 2007. Dating-simulation games: leisure and gaming of japanese youth culture. Southeast Review of Asian Studies (29): 192–208.
Vicente, Victor Manuel Barbosa. 2015. A análise de políticas públicas na perspectiva do modelo de coalizões de defesa. Revista de Políticas Públicas 19(1): 77-90. https://doi.org/10.18764/2178-2865.v19n1p77-90.
Weible, M. Christopher and Paul A. Sabatier. 2017. Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).