Sociological and linguistic analysis of narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2014.2.17117Keywords:
Narratives. Narrative analysis. Sociological narrative analysis.Abstract
Apart from classical ways of using narrative analysis in everyday communication as well as in linguistics and sociology, it is conceivable to detect the narrator’s interest constellations and a central stock of his general action capacities and specific institutional skills by way of his retrospective interpretation in verbal off-hand narratives of his own past conduct. His willingness to tell about personal experiences gets him into constraints to become more specific on the one hand, for if events are being told their respective consequences as new events have to be revealed etc. This constraint to become more specific brings up the narrator’s former and partly (at the time of the narrative) still existent actual interest constellations, because those are motivating, constituting elements of the events to be told about. On the other hand personally experienced stories point at wider action contexts and interrelationships (due to their retrospective character), and the kind in which narrators take account of these action contexts and interrelationships reveals something about their different degrees of action capacities. Both questions are only legitimate if we have the pre-condition of the sociological narrative analysis as proposed here: that the action contexts in the narrative are not just subjectively or even fictiously self-experieneed, but really accomplished. This pre-condition of sociological narrative analysis can be justified as a plausible imputation by the following aspect: as long as personally experienced stories are really told as off-hand narratives, the telling of them has to keep up the red line of temporal and causal linkage of past experiences in their respective relationship with the narrator, who at the same time is one of the central persons of action or at least of suffering in the story. In that respect telling those stories reproduces the existential conditions and orientations of the actual action system in important dimensions (except the layer of actual definitions of the situation).Downloads
References
ADLER, Franz. The sociology of religion as part of a generalized sociology of creative behavior. In: Joachim Matthes (Org.). Internationales Jahrbuch für Religionssoziologie. v. 3, Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1967. p. 7-30.
ARBEITSGRUPPE Bielefelder Soziologen (Org.). Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Reinbek: rororo-Studium, 1973.
BARTHES, Roland. Mythen des Alltags. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1964.
BARTHES, Roland. Introduction a l’analyse structurale des recits. Communications, v. 8, p. 1-27, s/d.
BARTON, Allan H. Communities in disaster. Garden City: Doubleday, 1969.
BERNSTEIN, Basil. Aspects of language and learning in the genesis of the social process. In: Dell H. Hymes (Org.). Language in culture and society. New York: Harper, 1964. p. 251-263.
BOHNSACK, Ralf. Handlungskompetenz und Jugendkriminalität. Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1973.
DANTO, Arthur C. Analytical philosophy of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.
VAN DIJK, Teun A.; IHWE, Jens; PETÖFI, Janos S.; RIESER, Hannes. Prolegomena zu einer Theorie des Narrativen. In: Jens Ihwe (Org.). Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum Fischer, v. 2, 1973. p. 51-77.
DUNDES, Alan. From etic to emic units in the structural study of folk-tales. Journal of American Folklore, v. 75, n. 296, p. 95-105, 1962.
DUNDES, Alan. The morphology of North American Indian folktales. Helsinki: Academia scientiarum Fennica, 1964.
GARFINKEL, Harold. Das Alltagswissen über soziale und innerhalb sozialer Strukturen. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Org.). Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Reinbek: rororo-Studium, 1973. p. 189-262.
GARFINKEL, Harold; SACKS, Harvey. On formal structures of practical actions. In: Jeff Coulter (Org.). Ethnomethodological sociology. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990. p. 55-84.
GOFFMAN, Erving. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper and Row: New York, 1974.
GRICE, H. P. Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole; J. L. Morgan (Orgs.). Syntax and semantics. v. 3: speech acts. New York: Academic, 1975. p. 41-58.
GÜLICH, Elisabeth. Erzählanalyse (Narrativik). In: Linguistik und Didaktik. v. 15,
p. 325-328, 1973.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Tübingen: Mohr, 1967.
HALLOWELL, A. Irving. Culture and experience. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1955.
HAWKINS, P. R. Soziale Schicht, nominale Gruppe und Referenz. In: Detlef C. Kochan (Org.). Sprache und kommunikative Kompetenz. Stuttgart: Klett, 1973.
p. 162-176.
HYMES, Dell H. Die Ethnographie des Sprechens. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen. Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Reinbek: rororo-Studium,1973. p. 338-432.
IHWE, Jens (Org.). Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik. 2 v. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer/Athenäum, 1973.
KLUCKHOLM, Clyde. Needed refinements in the biographical approach. In: S. S. Sargent; N. Smith (Orgs.). Culture and personality. New York: The Viking Fund, 1949.
KÖNGÄS-MARANDA, Elliund; MARANDA, Pierre. Strukturelle Modelle in der Folklore. In: Jens Ihwe (Org.). Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik. v. 2. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer/Athenäum, 1973. p. 127-214.
LABOV, William. Phonologica1 correlates of social stratification. In: John J. Gumperz; Dell H. Hymes (Orgs.). The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist, Special Publication, v. 66, n. 6; parte 2, p. 164-176, 1964.
LABOV, William. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In: William Labov. Language in the inner city: studies in black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1972. p. 354-396.
LABOV, William; WALETZKY, Joshua. Erzählanalyse: mündliche Versionen persönlicher Erfahrung. In: Jens Ihwe (Org.). Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik.
v. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer/Athenäum, v. 2, 1973. p. 78-126.
LEVI-STRAUSS, Claude. Die Sage von Asdiwal. In: C. A. Schmitz (Org.). Religionsethnologie. Frankfurt am Main: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1964.
p. 154-195.
LEVI-STRAUSS, Claude. Die Struktur der Mythen. In: Claude Levi-Strauss. Strukturale Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1967. p. 226-254.
MATTHES, Joachim; SCHÜTZE, Fritz. Zur Einführung: Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen. Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Reinbek: rororo-Studium, 1973. p. 11-53.
MEAD, George Herbert. Geist, Identität und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1968.
OSGOOD, Charles E. The representational model and relevant research methods. In: Ithiel de Sola Pool (Org.). Trends in content analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1959. p. 33-88.
PARSONS, Talcott. Social interaction. In: David L. Sills (Org.). International encyclopedia of the social sciences. v. 7. London: Routledge, 1968. p. 429-441.
PROPP, V. Morphologie des Märchens. München: Hanser, 1972.
SACKS, Harvey. On the analyzability of stories by children. In: John J. Gumperz; Deli H. Hymes (Orgs.). Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, 1972. p. 325-345.
SACKS, Harvey; JEFFERSON, Gail; SCHEGLOFF, Emanuel. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, v. 50, n. 4, p. 696-735, 1974.
SCHACHTER, Stanley; BURDICK, Harvey. A field experiment on rumor transmission and distortion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. v. 50, n. 3, p. 363-371, 1955.
SCHATZMAN, Leonard; STRAUSS, Anselm. Social class and modes of communication. American Journal of Sociology. v. 60, n. 4, p. 329-338, 1955.
SCHÜTZ, Alfred. Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Wien: Springer, 1960.
SCHÜTZ, Alfred. Collected papers. Den Haag: Nijhoff, 1962, 1964, 1966.
SCHÜTZE, Fritz. Sprache soziologisch gesehen. München: Fink, 1975a.
SCHÜTZE, Fritz. Zur Hervorlockung und Analyse von Erzählungen thematisch relevanter Geschichten im Rahmen soziologischer Feldforschung – dargestellt an einem Projekt zur Erforschung kommunaler Machtstrukturen. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen. Kommunikative Sozialforschung. München: Fink. 1975b. p. 159-260.
SCHÜTZE, Fritz; MEINEFELD, Werner; SPRINGER, Werner; WEYMANN, Weymann: Grundlagentheoretische Voraussetzungen methodisch kontrollierten Fremdverstehens. In: Arbeitsgruppe Bielefelder Soziologen (Org.). Alltagswissen, Interaktion und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeit. Reinbek: rororo-Studium, 1973. p. 433-495.
SHIBUTANI, Tamotsu. Improvised news: a sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
WATZLAWICK, Paul; BEAVIN, Janet H.; JACKSON, Don D. Menschliche Kommunikation. Bem: Huber, 1969.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).