Dogmas in science? Ideological barriers to paradigms shifting in the post-modern era

Gonzalo Velasco

doi:10.15448/1984-6746.2026.1.48659

Autores/as

Gonzalo Velasco Universidad Federal de Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-2169

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2026.1.48659

Palabras clave:

ciencia, método científico, teorías, dogmas, razón

Resumen

El conocimiento científico evoluciona mediante la sustitución de hipótesis y teorías antiguas cuando se demuestra que son erróneas o incompletas. Sin embargo, a veces, las consecuencias de aceptar teorías alternativas pueden sacudir la cosmovisión y las convicciones de algunos científicos. Analizamos que, en ocasiones, los científicos se aferran a sus ideas de la misma manera que acusan a las personas religiosas de abrazar sus principios dogmáticos, lo cual contradice la filosofía de la ciencia y frena el avanzo científico. Dos casos emblemáticos en las ciencias naturales son usados como ejemplos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Gonzalo Velasco, Universidad Federal de Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

Actualmente, Gonzalo Velasco Canziani es Profesor Asociado del Instituto de Oceanografía de la Universidad Federal de Rio Grande (FURG, RS, Brasil). Es Licenciado en Ciencias Biológicas por la Facultad de Ciencias de la Universidad de la República (Montevideo, Uruguay), posee una Maestría y un Doctorado en Oceanografía Biológica por la FURG, un Certificado Postdoctoral en Ecología por la Universidad Estadual Paulista (UNESP, Rio Claro, SP, Brasil) y una Licenciatura en Teología Católica por el Centro Universitario Internacional UNINTER (Curitiba, PR, Brasil). Imparte docencia en ciencias pesqueras, modelado de ecosistemas, historia y filosofía de la ciencia y método científico, tanto para estudiantes de pregrado como de posgrado. CV Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq. br/7903905832150527

Citas

BEHE, M. J. Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press, 1996.

BEHE, M. J. Irreducible complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution. Professorenforum-Journal, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 3-11, 2007.

BRITANNICA ENCYCLOPEDIA. Big-bang model. [S. l.], 2025. Available at: https://www.britannica.com/science/big-bang-model. Access on: July 21st, 2025.

BRITO, S. F.; OLIVEIRA, V. H. P.; MATOS, B. T. P. A noção de verdade segundo santo Tomás de Aquino. Aquinate, [s. l.], v. 34, p. 40-50, 2018.

COHEN, M. Filosofia para leigos. Rio de Janeiro: Alta Books, 2015.

CURTIS, H. Biologia. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Guanabara-Koogan, 1977.

DARWIN, C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 1861.

DAWKINS, R. Deus, um delírio. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007.

DAWKINS, R. O gene egoísta. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1979.

DE ROBERTIS, E.; HIB, J. Biologia Celular e Molecular. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2006.

DESCARTES, R. Discurso do método. São Paulo: Escala Educacional, 2006.

EASTBROOK, G. Science and God: A warming trend. Science, [s. l.], v. 227, p. 890-893, 1997.

EDDINGTON, A. The End of the World: from the Standpoint of Mathematical Physics. Nature, [s. l.], v. 127, p. 447–453, 1931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/127447a0. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/127447a0. Access on: Jul. 30th, 2025.

ELLIS, G. F. Does the Multiverse Really Exist? SciAm, [s. l.], Aug. 1, 2011. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-the-multiverse-really-exist/. Access on: Aug. 1st, 2025.

FERRY, L. Aprender a viver. Filosofia para os novos tempos. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2006.

FEYERABEND, P. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. 3. ed. London: Verso, 1993.

FORD, D. Scientific Method for Ecological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

GARROS, T. V. O mito do conflito entre ciência e religião: até quando? Nures, [s. l.], v. 34, p. 1-7, 2016.

GATES, B. The road ahead. New York: Viking, 1995.

GILES, J. Peer-reviewed paper defends theory of intelligent design. Nature, [s. l.], v. 431, p. 114, 2004.

HAWKING, S.; MLODINOW, L. The grand design. New York: Bantam Books, 2010.

HORNBY, A. S. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.

JOHN PAUL II. Encyclical Letter Fides et Ratio. The Holy See, Vatican, 14 Sept. 1998. Available at: https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html. Access on: May, 25th, 2025.

KNIGHT, K. The Summa Theologiæ of St. Thomas Aquinas. Second and Revised Edition, 1920. Literally translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Online Edition Copyright 2017, by Kevin Knight. Available at: https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1016.htm. Access on: June 1st, 2025.

KOCHE, J. C. Fundamentos de Metodologia Científica. Teoria da ciência e iniciação à pesquisa. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2007.

KRAGH, H. How did the Big Bang get its name? here's the real story. Essay 25 March 2024. Nature, [s. l.], v. 627, p. 726-728, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00894-z. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00894-z. Access on: Jun. 30th, 2025.

KUHN, T. S. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 9. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2007.

LEMAÎTRE, G. The Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum Theory. Nature, [s. l.], v. 127, p. 706, 1931.

LEMAÎTRE, G. Un univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant, rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiques. Ann. Soc. Sci. Brux, [s. l.], A47, p. 49-59, 1927. (Republished: A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-galactic Nebulæ. MNRAS 91(5): 483–490, 1931). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/91.5.483. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/91/5/483/985165. Access on: Jun. 7Th, 2025.

LENNOX, J. C. Cosmic Chemistry. Do God and Science mix? London: Lion Books, 2021.

LENNOX, J. C. God’s undertaker: has science buried God? Oxford: Lion Books, 2009.

LENNOX, J. C. Naturalism and Theism. Think, [s. l.], v. 56, n. 19, p. 89-101, 2020. DOI: 10.1017/S147717562000024X. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/think/article/abs/naturalism-and-theism/E48DF6CB1789A16F1D0B7260DF7EB872. Access on: Aug. 1st, 2025.

LÓPEZ, S. V. Elementos de Filosofia da Ciência. Rio Grande: Ed. FURG, 2014.

LUMINET, J. P. History of Science & Epistemology, Sciences. “The Rise of Big Bang Models (4): Lemaître”. Blog. 2015. Available at: https://blogs.futura-sciences.com/e-luminet/2015/06/21/the-rise-of-big-bang-models-4-lemaitre/. Access on: July, 26th, 2025.

MADDOX, J. Down with the Big Bang. Nature, [s. l.], v. 340, p. 425, 1989.

MEYER, S. C. Darwin's doubt. The explosive origin of animal life and the case for intelligent design. [S. l.]: HarperOne, 2014.

MEYER, S. C. The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, [s. l.], v. 117, p. 213-239, 2004.

MOORHEAD, P.; KAPLAN M. (ed.). Mathematical Challenges to the Neo-Darwinian Interpretation of Evolution. A Symposium Held at the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, April 25 and 26, 1966. Wistar Institute Symposium monograph, [s. l.], n. 5, 1967.

PENROSE, R. Before the Big Bang: an outrageous new perspective and its implications for particle physics. In: PROCEEDINGS of EPAC 2006. Edinburgh: [s. n.], 2006. p. 2759-2762.

RABOLINI, L. Feyerabend contra os dogmas do método científico. Artigo de Luca Guzzardi, 2024. Available at: https://ihu.unisinos.br/categorias/639520-feyerabend-contra-os-dogmas-do-metodo-cientifico-artigo-de-luca-guzzardi. Access on: Sept. 17th, 2025.

RAMPAZZO, L. Metodologia científica [para alunos de cursos de graduação e pós-graduação]. São Paulo: Loyola, 2010.

ROSENHOUSE, J. On Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism. Science & Education, [s. l.], v. 25, p. 95-114, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9801-7. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-015-9801-7. Access on: Jun. 30Th, 2025.

RUSSELL, B. História do pensamento ocidental: A Aventura dos pré-socráticos a Wittgenstein. 21. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 2017.

TOUR, J.; PARKER, M. C.; JEYNES, C. Thermodynamic limitations on the natural emergence of long chain molecules: implications for origin of life. BioCosmos, [s. l.], v. 1, p. 64-71, 2025. DOI: 10.2478/biocosmos-2025-0010. Available at: https://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/biocosmos-2025-0010. Access on: Aug. 1st, 2025.

TREVORS, J. T. Genome size in bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, [s. l.], v. 69, p. 293–303, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399618. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00399618. Access on: Jul. 1st, 2025.

VELASCO, G. Princípios de história, filosofia da ciência, e metodologia científica. Porto Alegre: Fi, 2025.

VILENKIN, A.; TEGMARK, M. The Case for Parallel Universes. Why the multiverse, crazy as it sounds, is a solid scientific idea. SciAm, [s. l.], Jul. 19, 2011. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/multiverse-the-case-for-parallel-universe/. Access on: Aug. 1st, 2025.

VOLPATO, G. L. Ciência: da filosofia à publicação. 6. ed. Marília: Cultura Acadêmica, 2013.

WARBURTON, N. Uma breve história da filosofia. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 2012.

WELLS, J. "In China We Can Criticize Darwin": Prelude. [S. l.], 2014. Available at: https://evolutionnews.org/2014/04/in_china_we_can/. Access on: Aug. 4th, 2025.