Revisitando o equilíbrio reflexivo amplo numa teoria crítica da IA: ecofeminismo, decolonialidade, sustentabilidade

Nythamar de Oliveira

doi:10.15448/1984-6746.2025.1.48601

Autores/as

Nythamar de Oliveira Pontificia Universidad Católica de Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-1031

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2025.1.48601

Palabras clave:

Decolonialidad, Ecofeminismo, Equilibrio Reflexivo, Inteligencia Artificial, Sostenibilidad

Resumen

Este artículo propone una reformulación del equilibrio reflexivo amplio, concebido originalmente por John Rawls y posteriormente evocado por eticistas y teóricos de la bioética, la neuroética y, más recientemente, la ética de la inteligencia artificial, con el objetivo de promover un igualitarismo interseccional (socioeconómico, de género, racial-étnico, ambiental) a través de la inclusión digital. Se argumenta que solo desde una perspectiva decolonial de la teoría crítica, combinada con una visión ecofeminista de la sostenibilidad, se puede recurrir al equilibrio reflexivo para remediar el llamado déficit fenomenológico de las teorías normativas y naturalistas, evitando el normativismo de los modelos principistas y el reduccionismo de los modelos eliminativistas y fisicalistas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Nythamar de Oliveira, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

Ph.D. in Philosophy, State University of New York, 1994. Professor Titular, PPG-Filosofia, Escola de Humanidades, PUCRS. Pesquisador do CNPq desde 1995.

Citas

ALLEN, Amy. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.

ANDREAZZA, Tiaraju. Equilíbrio Reflexivo Amplo e a Revisibilidade das Crenças Morais. Ethic@, Florianópolis, v. 14, n. 3, p. 473-489, 2015.

BARRY, Brian. Theories of Justice: A Treatise on Social Justice. v. I. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.

BAYNES, Kenneth. Critical Theory and Habermas. In: MANDLE, Jon; REIDY, David (ed.). A Companion to Rawls. Malden: Blackwell, 2014. p. 487-503.

BAYNES, Kenneth. The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, Habermas. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.

BENHABIB, Seyla. The methodological illusions of modern political theory: The case of Rawls and Habermas. Neue Hefte für Philosophie, [s. l.], p. 47-74, 1982.

BENHABIB, Seyla. Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. [S. l.]: Polity Press, 1992.

BENHABIB, Seyla; CORNELL, Drucilla (ed.). Feminism as Critique: On the Politics of Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

BLACKBURN, Simon. Essays in Quasi-realism: A defence of quasi-realism as applied to ethics. Oxford University Press, 1993.

BLACKBURN, Simon. Ruling Passions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

BODDINGTON, Paula. AI Ethics. A Textbook. Artificial Intelligence: Foundations, Theory and Algorithms. London: Springer, 2023.

BOSTROM, Nick. Superinteligência: Caminhos, perigos e estratégias para um novo mundo. Rio de Janeiro: Darkside Books, 2018.

BUTLER, Judith. What is Critique? An Essay on Foucault’s Virtue. In: INGRAM, David (ed.). The Political: Readings in Continental Philosophy. [S. l.]: Basil Blackwell, 2002.

CHALMERS, David. Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy. [S. l.]: W. W. Norton, 2022.

CHURCHLAND, Patricia. Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

CRISP, Roger (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

CRISP, Roger. Reasons and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.

DANIELS, Norman. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

D'EAUBONNE, Françoise. Le féminisme ou la mort. Paris: Horay, 1974.

FEENBERG, Andrew. Technosystem: The social life of reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.

FLORIDI, Luciano. Information ethics: On the philosophical foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 33-52, 1999.

FORST, Rainer. The Point of Justice. On the Paradigmatic Incompatibility between Rawlsian ‘Justice as Fairness’ and Luck Egalitarianism. In: MANDLE, Jon; ROBERTS-CADY, Sarah (ed.). John Rawls: Debating the Major Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. p. 148-160.

FORST, Rainer. Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.

FORST, Rainer. Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit. Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Kommunitarismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994. (Em português: Contextos da justiça. Para além de liberalismo e comunitarismo. Trad. D.L. Werle. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010).

FORST, Rainer. Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. New York: Wiley, 2013.

FRASER, Nancy. Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In: CALHOUN, Craig J. Habermas and the Public Sphere. Boston: MIT Press, 1992.

FREY, R. G.; WELLMAN, Christopher H. (ed.). A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Malden: Blackwell, 2003.

GOODMAN, Nelson. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, second edition. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1962.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Technology and Science as ‘Ideology’. In: TOWARD a Rational Society. Oxford: Polity Press, 1987. [Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1968].

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e Democracia: Entre facticidade e validade. v. I e II. Tradução de Flávio Beno Sieveneichler. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit und die deliberative Politik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2022. (Em português: Uma nova mudança estrutural da esfera pública e a política deliberativa. Trad. Denilson Werle. São Paulo: Unesp, 2023).

HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action II: Lifeworld and System. Trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989.

KAUFMAN, Dora. Desmistificando a Inteligência Artificial. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2017.

MARCUSE, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1964.

MENDIETA, Eduardo. Philosophy of Liberation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Winter 2020. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/liberation/. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2025.

MENKE, Christoph. Theorie der Befreiung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2024.

MIKHAIL, John. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

MÜLLER, V. C. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by E. N. Zalta. 2021. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/sum2021/entries/ethics-ai/. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2025.

OLIVEIRA, Nythamar de. Revisiting Political Pragmatism and Education: Rawls, Dewey, Bernstein. Cognitio, São Paulo, v. 25, n. 1, 2024. Disponível em: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/64973/44931. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2025.

OLIVEIRA, Nythamar de; MOURA, Julia S.; CONSANI, Cristina F. (org.). Justiça e Libertação: A Tribute to John Rawls. Porto Alegre: Fundação Editora Fênix, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.36592/9786581110482. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2025.

PARFIT, Derek. On What Matters. 3 v. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

PARSONS, Charles. Philosophy of Mathematics in the Twentieth Century: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.

RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. (Paperback edition, 1996).

RUSSELL, Stuart J.; NORVIG, Peter. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4. ed. London: Pearson, 2022.

SAAR, Martin. Genealogy and Subjectivity. European Journal of Philosophy, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 231-245, 2002.

SEARLE, John. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

SILVEIRA, Denis Coitinho. Posição Original e Equilíbrio Reflexivo em John Rawls: O Problema da Justificação. Trans/Form/Ação, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 139-157, 2009.

TEIXEIRA, João Fernandes. Filosofia da Mente e Inteligência Artificial. Campinas: Unicamp, 2016.

WAELEN, R. Why AI Ethics is a Critical Theory. Philosophy & Technology, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 9, p. 1-16, 2022.

YOUNG, H. P. Social Norms. In: DURLAUF, Steven N.; BLUME, Lawrence E. (ed.). New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. [S. l.]: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008.