What human life is according to Hans Jonas?

Once homo faber, always homo faber

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.46030

Keywords:

Homo Faber, Life, Jonas, Technology, Technophobia, Philosophical Anthropology

Abstract

The paper aims to show the centrality of homo faber in the configuration of the human within the scope of Hans Jonas’s philosophy of life, that is, in his philosophical anthropology. Although Jonas presents a substantive critique of homo faber in the context of intensely technological contemporary societies, diagnosing that modern technique has become a determinant of human life as a whole and, therefore, despite the enormous benefits that it has brought with it, the deleterious impacts it causes not only for humans, but for life on the entire planet, it is not a technophobic perspective, of denial of technique, but of asking about which technique we want. In this sense, homo faber would remain central in his philosophical anthropology and his critique of modern technique as a main point of his ethics of responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Helder Buenos Aires de Carvalho, Federal University of Piauí, PPG Philosophy/UFPI, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil. PQ2/CNPq scholarship holder.

PhD in Philosophy, UFMG; Postdoctoral researcher in Philosophy: PUCRS, 2010; UFMG, 2028; Full Professor at the Department of Philosophy, UFPI; Professor in the Graduate Program in Philosophy, UFPI; PQ2/CNPq Researcher.

References

ARENDT, Hanna. The human condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: The Chicago University Press, 2019.

BECK, Ulrich. La Societé du Risque. Sur la voie d’une autre modernité. Paris: Flammarion, 2001 [1986].

CHIARELLO, Maurício. The transanimal in man: on the question of animality in Hans Jonas. Trans/Form/Ação, São Paulo, v. 39, n. 4, p. 173-196, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732016000400009

HABERMAS, Jürgen. O futuro da natureza humana. A caminho de uma eugenia liberal? São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2004.

IHDE, Don. Preface. In: R. ROSENBERGER; P.-P. VERBEEK (ed.). Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technologies Relations. Lanham, Lexington Books, 2015. p. vii-xvi.

IHDE, Don; MALAFOURIS, L. Homo Faber revisited: Postphenomenology and Material Engagement Theory. Philosophy & Technology, Netherlands, v. 32, n. 2, p. 195-214, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0321-7

IHDE, Don. Tecnologia e o mundo da vida: do jardim à terra. Chapecó: Universidade Federal Fronteira Sul, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9788564905610

IHDE, Don. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking Lectures. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438426402

JONAS, Hans. Pensar sobre Dios y Otros Ensayos. Trad. Angela Ackermann. Barcelona: Herder, 1998 [1992].

JONAS, Hans. Ricerche Filosofiche e Ipotesi Metafisiche. A cura di Alessandra Campo. Milano, Mimesis Edizioni, 2011a [1994].

JONAS, Hans. Frontiere della vita, frontiere della tecnica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2011b.

JONAS, Hans. O Princípio Vida: fundamentos para uma biologia filosófica. Trad. Carlos Almeida Pereira. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004 [1973].

JONAS, Hans. O princípio responsabilidade: Ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. Trad. Marijane Lisboa e Luiz Barros Montez. Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio/Contraponto, 2006 [1979].

KROES, Peter.; MEIJERS, Anthonie (ed.). The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology. Bingley, Emerald Group, 2000.

LEBRUN, Gérard. Sobre a tecnologia. In: MOURA, Carlos A. R.; CACCIOLA, Maria Lúcia M. O.; LOURENA, Marta (org.). Filosofia e sua história. São Paulo: Cosac y Naify, 2006. p. 488-508.

OLIVEIRA, Jelson R. A transanimalidade do homem: uma premissa do Princípio Responsabilidade. Dissertatio: Revista de Filosofia, Pelotas, n. 32, p. 77-97, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15210/dissertatio.v32i0.8743

OLIVEIRA, Jelson R. Para uma ethical turn da tecnologia: Porque Hans Jonas não é um tecnofóbico. Trans/Form/Ação, São Paulo, n. 45, p. 191-206, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45n2.p191

ORTEGA Y GASSET, José. Meditação sobre a técnica: vicissitudes das ciências. Cacofonia na física. Tradução e Prólogo de Luís Washington Vita. Rio de Janeiro: Livro Ibero-Americano Limitada, 1963.

PINSART, Marie-Geneviève. Hans Jonas: Une réflexion sur la civilisation technologique. In: CHABOT, Pascal; HOTTOIS, Gilbert (ed.). Les philosophes et la technique. Paris, Vrin, 2003. p. 186-202.

PERSSON, Ingmar; SAVULESCU, Julian. Unfit for the future: The need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford: OUP, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653645.001.0001

SADIN, Éric. Hacer disidencia. Una política de nosotros mismos. Barcelona: Editorial Herder, 2023.

SÉRIS, Jean-Pierre. La Technique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1994.

SÈVE, Bernard. Hans Jonas et l’éthique de la responsabilité́. Revue Esprit, Paris, n. 165, p. 72- 88, out. 1990.

MERLO, Alejandro Serani; FORMIGO, Yván Lailhacar. La conducta animal y lo transanimal en el hombre en la biología filosófica de Hans Jonas. Síntesis: Revista de Filosofía, Viña del Mar, v. 8, n. 2, p. 9-22, 2018. DOI: 10.15691/0718-5448Vol8Iss2a192. Acesso em: 25 jun. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15691/0718-5448Vol8Iss2a192

Downloads

Published

2024-10-03

How to Cite

Buenos Aires de Carvalho, H. (2024). What human life is according to Hans Jonas? Once homo faber, always homo faber. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 69(1), e46030. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.46030

Issue

Section

Philosophy & Interdisciplinarity