Dialectical Nets

Static Part

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2023.1.44462

Keywords:

Argumentation, Formal Dialectic, Argument Mining, State Transition Networks, Algebraic Representation, Diagrammatic Representation

Abstract

Dialectical Nets aim at the representation of the elements of a dispute: the assertions of the Proponent and of the Opponent, and the actions of attack and defense. I propose a diagrammatic representation – the Dialectical Diagram – and an algebraic one – the Dialectical Graph – of the Dialectical Nets. This work is limited to the static-structural aspects of the Dialectical Nets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Frank Thomas Sautter, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.

PhD in Philosophy from the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), in Campinas, SP, Brazil. Full Professor of the Department of Philosophy at the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), in Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. Research Productivity Scholarship from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brazil).

References

ANGELELLI, Ignacio. The Techniques of Disputation in the History of Logic. The Journal of Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 67, n. 20, p. 800-815, 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2024013

CLERBOUT, Nicolas; MCCONAIGHEY, Zoe. Dialogical Logic. In: ZALTA, Edward; NODELMAN, Uri. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [S. l.]: Stanford University, 2022. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/logic-dialogical. Acesso em: 28 fev. 2023.

CLIFFORD, William Kingdon; JAMES, William; PLANTINGA, Alvin. A Ética da Crença. Tradução de Vítor Guerreiro. Lisboa: Bizâncio, 2010.

COSTA, Cláudio. Uma Introdução Contemporânea à Filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.

JACQUETTE, Dale. Enhancing the Diagramming Method in Informal Logic. Argument, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 327-360, 2011.

JENSEN, Kurt. Coloured Petri Nets and the Invariant- -Method. Theoretical Computer Science, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 3, p. 317-336, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(81)90049-9

KRABBE, Erik. The problem of retraction in critical discussion. Synthese, [S. l.], v. 127, n. 1/2, p. 141-159, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010318403544

LAWRENCE, John; REED, Chris. Argument Mining: A Survey. Computational Linguistics, [S. l.], v. 45, n. 4, p. 765-818, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00364

MATTHEWS, Gareth. Santo Agostinho: A vida e as ideias de um filósofo adiante de seu tempo. Tradução de Álvaro Cabral. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2007.

PELDSZUS, Andreas; STEDE, Manfred. From Argument Diagrams to Argumentation Mining in Texts: A Survey. International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jcini.2013010101

PLEBE, Armando; EMANUELE, Pietro. Manual de Retórica. Tradução de Eduardo Brandão. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1992.

POZZI, Federico Alberto; FERSINI, Elisabetta; MESSINA, Enza; LIU, Bing (ed.) Sentiment Analysis in Social Networks. Cambridge: Morgan Kaufmann, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804412-4.00001-2

PUENTE, Fernando Rey (org.) Os filósofos e a mentira. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2008.

REED, Chris; WALTON, Douglas; MACAGNO, Fabrizio. Argument Diagramming in Logic, Law and Artificial Intelligence. The Knowledge Engineering Review, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 87-109, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888907001051

REISIG, Wolfgang. Understanding Petri Nets: Modeling Techniques, Analysis Methods, Case Studies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33278-4

RUSSELL, Bertrand. A Existência de Deus – Um Debate entre Bertrand Russell e o Padre F.C. Copleston, da Sociedade de Jesus. In: RUSSELL, Bertrand. Por que não sou cristão. Tradução de Ana Ban. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 2013. p. 71-82.

SANDEL, Michael. O Que o Dinheiro Não Compra: Os Limites Morais do Mercado. Tradução de Clóvis Marques. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-12

How to Cite

Sautter, F. T. (2023). Dialectical Nets: Static Part. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 68(1), e44462. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2023.1.44462

Issue

Vol. 68 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume

Section

Epistemology & Philosophy of Language

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Veritas (Porto Alegre)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.


Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p