Collective Epistemology: group belief, justification and knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.3.28487Keywords:
collective epistemology, collectivism, individualism, groups, social epistemologyAbstract
In this essay we will systematize collective epistemology key concepts, presenting different views that explain our ordinary ascription of cognitive states (such as belief, justification and/or knowledge) to groups. In the introduction we raise the central question that prompts the discussion in the field: ascriptions of cognitive states to groups refers to the group itself or to the individuals who compose it? In the first section we set forth the best arguments in favor of individualism, those who argue for the thesis that our ascriptions might be reduced to individuals. In the second, third and fourth sections we present collectivist models, which claim that a group has some autonomy from individuals, the set of members who compose it. In the fifth and sixth sections we introduce how collectivist models explain the ascription of justification and knowledge to groups. We conclude by noting that collectivist attacks to individualism are very compelling, making the latter very difficult to sustain, and pointing out further elements necessary for a complete collective model.Downloads
References
BORGES, R. “Defeating Objections to Group Knowledge” p. 1-18. Manuscrito não publicado.
BRATMAN, M. (ed) Faces of Intention: selected essays on intention and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625190
CARIANI, F. “Epistemology in group agency: six objections in search of truth” Episteme 9 (3), 2012, p. 255-269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2012.15
CARTER, A. “Group Peer Disagreement” Ratio, v 27, n3, 2014, p. 11-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12077
_____. “Group Knowledge and Epistemic Defeat” Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, v 28, n2, 2015, p. 711-735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.028
CICHOSKI, L; RUIVO, J.L.A. “Agregação de Juízo na Epistemologia Social: a proposta de Christian List e Philip Pettit” In: CARVALHO, M. (et al). Pragmatismo, filosofia analítica e filosofia da mente. São Paulo: ANPOF, 2015. p. 273-302
ETCHEVERRY, K. “Algumas considerações sobre agência epistêmica coletiva” In: RUIVO, J. L. A. (Org.) Proceedings of the Brazilian Research Group on Epistemology 2017: Social Epistemology. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2017. (NO PRELO)
GILBERT, M. “Modelling Collective Belief” Synthese 73 (1), 1987, p. 185-204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485446
_____. On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989
_____. “Introduction: Two Standpoints - the personal and the collective” In: Living Together: Rationality, Sociality, and Obligation. Lanham, MD: Rowman e Littlefield, 1996. P. 1-20.
_____. “Introduction” In: Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014a. P. 1- 19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.003.0001
_____. ‘Collective Epistemology’ In: Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014b. P. 163-180 (Trabalho original publicado em 2004) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.003.0008
_____ “Considerations on Joint Commitment: Responses to Various Comments” In: Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014c. P. 37-57 (Trabalho original publicado em 2002) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.003.0003
_____. “Belief and Acceptance as Features of Groups” In: Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014d. P. 131-162 (Trabalho original publicado em 2002) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970148.003.0007
GILBERT, M.; PILCHMAN, D. “Belief, Acceptance, and What Happens in Groups”. LACKEY, J. (ed) Essays in collective epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014e. P. 189-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665792.003.0009
GOLDMAN, A. “Social Process Reliabilism: Solving Justification Problems in Collective Epistemology.” In: LACKEY, J. (ed) Essays in collective epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. P. 11–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665792.003.0002
GOLDMAN, A.; BLANCHARD, T. “Social Epistemology” ZALTA, E. (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2016. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemology-social> Acesso em: 7 de Fevereiro de 2017.
HAKLI, R. “Group beliefs and the distinction between belief and acceptance” Cognitive Systems Research, v 7, 2006, p. 286-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.013
_____. "On the possibility of group knowledge without belief" Social Epistemology, v 21, n3, 2007, p. 249-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701685581
_____. “On dialectical justification of group beliefs” SCHMID, H.B.; SIRTES, D.; WEBER, M. (eds) Collective Epistemology. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2011. P. 119-153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322583.119
KALLESTRUP, J. “Group virtue epistemology” Synthese, 2016, p. 1-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1225-7
LACKEY, J. “Socially Extended Knowledge” Philosophical Issues 24, (1), 2014, p. 282-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12034
_____. “What is justified group belief?” Philosophical Review 125 (3), 2016, p. 341-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3516946
LATOUR, B.; WOOLGAR, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820412
LIST, C; PETTIT, P. Group agency: the possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001
LUZ, A. M. “Virtudes intelectuais sociais” In: MULLER, F. M.; LUZ, A. M. (Org.) . O que NÓS conhecemos? Ensaios em epistemologia individual e social. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2015. P. 115-126
MATHIESEN, Kay. “Can Groups Be Epistemic Agents?” SCHMID, H.B.; SIRTES, D.; WEBER, M. (eds) Collective Epistemology. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2011. P. 23-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110322583.23
MILLER, S. “Joint Action” Philosophical Papers 21 (3), 1992, p. 275-297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/05568649209506386
_____. “Intentions, ends and joint action” Philosophical Papers 24 (1), 1995, p. 51-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/05568649509506519
MOREIRA, D. “Agentes epistêmicos coletivos e o argumento da não divergência” In: RUIVO, J. L. A. (Org.) Proceedings of the Brazilian Research Group on Epistemology 2017: Social Epistemology. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2017. (NO PRELO)
MÜLLER, F. M. “Conhecimento Coletivo em Perspectiva”. In: BAVARESCO, A.; VILLANOVA, M.; RODRIGUES, T. V. (Org.). Projetos de Filosofia II. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2012a, v. 1, p. 68-91.
_____. “Conhecimento de Grupo”. In: MÜLLER, F. M. RODRIGUES, T.V.. (Org.). Epistemologia Social: Dimensão Social do Conhecimento..Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2012b, v. 1, p. 118-136.
_____. 2015. “Virtudes epistêmicas coletivas” In: MULLER, F. M.; LUZ, A. M. (Org.). O que NÓS conhecemos? Ensaios em epistemologia individual e social. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2015. P. 127-144
PETTIT, P. “Groups with Minds of Their Own.” In: SCHMITT, F. (Ed.). Socializing Metaphysics: The natures of social reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2003, p.167-193
PIGOZZI, G. “Belief Merging and Judgment Aggregation". ZALTA, E. N. (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2015. Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/belief-merging/>. Acesso em: 25 de Abril de 2017.
RITCHIE, K. “The Metaphysics of Social Groups” Philosophy Compass 10 (5), 2015, p. 310-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12213
ROVANE, C. “Group Agency and Individualism” Erkenntnis, v 79, n9, 2014, p. 1663-1684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9634-9
RUIVO, J.L.A. Crença de Grupo, 2017. 105 f. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) - Escola de Humanidades, PUCRS, Porto Alegre, 2017.
SCHMID, H. B.; SCHWEIKARD, D.P. "Collective Intentionality", ZALTA, E. N. (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2013. Disponível em:<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/collective-intentionality>. Acesso em: 7 de Fevereiro de 2017.
SCHMITT, F. “The justification of group beliefs”. In: SCHMITT, F. (Ed.). Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1994, p. 257-287
SEARLE, “Collective Intentions and Actions” In: COHEN, P.; MORGAN, J.; POLLACK, M.E. (eds) Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, Mass: Bradford Books, MIT Press, 1990. P. 401-416.
_____. The construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press, 1995.
_____. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
TOLLEFSEN, D. “Challenging epistemic individualism” ProtoSociology 16, 2002a, p. 86-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology20021622
_____. “Collective Intentionality and the Social Sciences” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32: 25, 2002b, p. 25-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004839310203200102
_____. Groups as Agents. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
TOWNSEND, L. “Being and Becoming in the Theory of Group Agency” Abstracta, v 7 n1, 2013, p. 39-53.
TUOMELA, R.; MILLER, K. “We-Intentions” Philosophical Studies, v 53, 1988, p. 367–389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353512
TUOMELA, R. The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313390.001.0001
_____. Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
VELLEMAN, D. “How To Share An Intention” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v 57, n1, 1997, p. 29-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2953776
WRAY, B. “Collective Belief and Acceptance” Synthese, v 129, n3, 2001, p. 319-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013148515033
_____. “What really divides Gilbert and the rejectionists?” Protosociology, v 18, 2003, p. 363–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/protosociology200318/1914
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p