Three types of logical form

Authors

  • John Bolender Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul Departamento da Filosofia, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.3.27292

Keywords:

color incompatibility, discrete infinity, logical form, mental representation, natural logic, semantic holism

Abstract

In generative linguistics, various formal properties of representational systems are distinguished: discrete infinity, discrete finitude, continuum infinity. Philosophers do not often apply these distinctions to the study of logical form. The fact that the distinctions are rarely applied has resulted in philosophers assuming, usually without argument, that all logical forms exhibit discrete infinity, as does natural language. (One noteworthy exception is Ludwig Wittgenstein, circa 1930.) This article argues for the existence of other types of logical form in addition to that which exhibits discrete infinity. In mental representation, one finds forms exhibiting continuum infinity and discrete finitude, in addition to discrete infinity. Furthermore, these representations stand in logical relations to one another, partly in virtue of these forms. This is equivalent to the claim that the study of natural logic must go beyond the language faculty, extending to logical forms pertaining to mental representations which are not sentence-like. This would include pictorial logical forms. The ultimate point is that, in the study of natural logic, one must also consider logical forms represented by mental systems predating the evolution of language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERWICK, R. C. e CHOMSKY, N. Why Only Us?: Language and Evolution, Cambridge, MA e Londres: The MIT Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001

BRATTICO, P. Recursion Hypothesis Considered as a Research Program for Cognitive Science Minds and Machines, 20, 2 (2010), p. 213-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9189-8

CHOMSKY, N. Rules and Representations. Nova York: Columbia University Press, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00001515

______. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA e Londres: The MIT Press, 1995.

______. Novos Horizontes no Estudo da Linguagem e da Mente. Trad. Marco Antônio Sant’Anna. São Paulo: Editora Unesp., 2002.

______. Replies. In: ANTONY, L. M. e HORNSTEIN, N. (Eds.). Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

______. Linguagem e Mente, 3 Ed. Trad. Roberto Leal Ferreira. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2009.

______. A Ciência da Linguagem: Conversas com James McGilvray. Trad. Ávila Othero, Luisandro Mendes Sousa, e Sérgio de Moura Menuzzi. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2012.

CORBALLIS, M. C. The Recursive Mind: The Origins of Human Language, Thought, and Civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

DAVIDSON, D. On Saying That. Synthese,19, (1968) p. 130-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00568054

EVERAERT, M. B. H., HUYBREGTS, M. A. C., CHOMSKY, N., BERWICK, R. C. e BOLHUIS, J. J. Structures, Not Strings: Linguistics as Part of the Cognitive Sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 12 (2015) p. 729-743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.008

FEYERABEND, P. K. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171526

______. “Adeus à Razão”. Trad. Vera Joscelyne. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2003.

FODOR, J. A. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA e Londres: The MIT Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001

______. LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

FODOR, J. A. e LEPORE, E. Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Oxford e Cambridge: Blackwell, 1992.

FREGE, G. Investigações Lógicas. Trad., organização e notas P. Alcoforado. Porto Alegre: EdiPUCRS, 2002.

HARMAN, G. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA e Londres: The MIT Press, 1986.

HAUSER, M. D., CHOMSKY, N. e FITCH, W. T. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?. Science, 298, 5598 (2002) p. 1569-1579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569

LARSON, R. e SEGAL, G. Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory. Nova Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India, 1998.

LUDLOW, P. LF and Natural Logic. In: (Eds.) PREYER, G. e PETER, G. Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

______. The Philosophy of Generative Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

LUGG, A. Wittgenstein in the Mid-1930s: Calculi and Language-Games. In: (Ed.) VENTERINHA, N. The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Nova York e Londres: Routledge, 2011.

MOSS, S. Solving the Color Incompatibility Problem. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41 (2012) p. 841-851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-011-9193-3

NARENS, L. A General Theory of Ratio Scalability with Remarks about the Measurement- Theoretic Concept of Meaningfulness. Theory and Decision, 13 (1981) p. 1-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342603

______. Theories of Meaningfulness. Mahwah NJ e Londres: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002.

POSTAL, P. M. Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

PUTNAM, H. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625398

QUINE, W. V. O. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. In: The Philosophical Review, 60 (1951) p. 20-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906

______. Filosofia da Lógica. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores. Trad. Therezinha Alvim Cannabrava, 1972.

______. The Methods of Logic, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

STENNING, K. e VAN LAMBALGEN, M. Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA e Londres: The MIT Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7964.001.0001

STEVENS, S. S. On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Science, 103 (1946) p. 677-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677

THOM, C., GILLEY, D. C., HOOPER, J., e ESCH, H. E. The Scent of the Waggle Dance. PLOS Biology, 5, 9 (2007) p. 1862-1867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050228

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trad. José Arthur Giannotti. São Paulo: Editôra da Universidade de São Paulo, 1961.

______. Investigações Filosóficas. Trad. José Carlos Bruni. São Paulo: Nova Cultura, 1999.

______. Observações Filosóficas. Trad. Adail Sobral e Maria Stela Gonçalves. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2005.

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

Bolender, J. (2017). Three types of logical form. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 62(3), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.3.27292