Portuguese version of the user satisfaction scale with the care of the family physician – SatMF17: psychometric validation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.3.31286Keywords:
patient satisfaction, general practitioners, validation studies.Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the satisfaction scale of patients with the care of the family physician (SatMF17).
METHODS: Methodological study, in which users enrolled in Family Health Units and Personalized Health Care Units of the Marão and Douro Norte Health Centers. The criteria for inclusion of the users were: to be a patient enrolled in one of the two referenced units, to be over 18 and under 65 years old, to be able to read and write and to have had, at least, one visit in the last year in one of the two units. The SatMF17 scale consists of 17 items, answered by a Likert scale ranging from 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent), in which the sum ranges from 17 to 85. The data collection was carried out in the period between January and June 2016. The patient who met the inclusion criteria upon arrival at the health unit was invited to participate in the study by the administrative assistant. After a presentation and explanation of the objectives of the study, and signing of the consent term, the questionnaire was offered to the patient, who at the end of self-completion inserted it into an envelope. For statistical analysis, the statistical resources were Cronbach's alpha coefficient, exploratory factorial analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin criteria, Bartlett's sphericity test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The sample included had 284 patients, of whom 159 (56,0%) were female. The mean age was 41,2 years, ranging from 18 years to 65 years. The exploratory factorial analysis in main components and varimax rotation revealed a factorial solution of two factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, which together explain 72,48% of the total variance of patient satisfaction with the care of the family doctor.
CONCLUSIONS: The SatMF17 Scale is reliable and valid and can be used in populations with similar characteristics, constituting an instrument of practical utility to evaluate the satisfaction of patients with the care of the family doctor.
Downloads
References
Batista R. Qualidade percebida pelos utentes das IPSS de Oliveira do Hospital. Dissertação [dissertation]. [Aveiro]: Universidade de Aveiro; 2010. 99p.
Hollanda E, Siqueira SA, Andrade GR, Molinaro A, Vaitsman J. Satisfação e responsividade em serviços de atenção à saúde da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva. 2012;17(12):3343-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232012001200019
Detollenaere J, Hanssens L, Schäfer W, Willems S. Can you recommend me a good GP? Describing social differences in patient satisfaction within 31 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;30(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx157
Ferreira PL. Avaliação dos doentes de cuidados primários: Enquadramento conceptual. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2000;16:53-62.
Freitas MJ, Parreira P, Domingues JP. Avaliação das propriedades psicométricas da Escala Satisfação dos Clientes com os Cuidados de Enfermagem no Hospital. Rev Enf Ref. 2016;IV(10):9-17. https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV16031
Paula A, Long R, Wiener D. Are Your Patients Satisfied?. Mark Health Serv. 2002;22(3):28-32.
Fernandes, ME. Avaliação da satisfação de utentes de um serviço prestador de cuidados de saúde mental comunitários: estudo exploratório. Dissertação [dissertation]. [Porto], Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 2014. 47p.
Di Matteo MR, Giordani PJ, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Patient adherence and medical treatment outcomes: a meta-analysis. Med Care. 2002;40(9):794-811. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200209000-00009
Gill L, White L. A critical review of patient satisfaction. Leadership Health Serv. 2009;22(1):8-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511870910927994
Biscaia A, Martins J, Carreira M, Gonçalves I. Cuidados de Saúde Primários em Portugal: reformar para novos sucessos. Lisboa: Padrões Conceptuais Editora; 2006.
Roque H, Veloso A, Ferreira PL. Versão portuguesa do questionário EUROPEP: contributos para a validação psicométrica. Rev Saúde Pública. 2016;50:61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006259
Fortin MF. Fundamentos e etapas do processo de investigação. Lisboa: Lusodidata; 2009.
Marôco JP. Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics. 5ª edição. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber; 2011.
Marôco JP. Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics. 6ª edição. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber; 2014.
Pereira RP, Guerra AC, Cardoso MJ, Santos AT, Figueiredo MC, Carneiro AC. Validação da versão portuguesa do Questionário de Eficácia Clínica e Prática Baseada em Evidências. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2015;23(2):345-51. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0367.2561
Marôco JP, Garcia-Marques T. Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? Laboratório de Psicologia. 2006;4(1):65-90.
Pestana MH, Gageiro JN. Análise de dados para ciências sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS. 5ª edição. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo; 2008.
Marôco JP. Análise de Equações Estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, Software e Aplicações. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber; 2010.
Portugal. Minitério da Saúde. Direção Geral da Saúde. Plano nacional de saúde: revisão e extensão a 2020. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. Lisboa, 2015. p.14. Available from: http://1nj5ms2lli5hdggbe3mm7ms5.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2015/06/Plano-Nacional-de-Saude-Revisao-e-Extensao-a-2020.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Scientia Medica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
