The early history of labor analgesia: women's strength
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2014.4.18161Keywords:
ANALGESIA, OBSTECTRICAL, HISTORY OF MEDICINE, EPIDURAL, APGAR SCOREAbstract
AIMS: Over time, beliefs, religious views and the medical community marked the evolution of labor analgesia. Women, directly or indirectly, were major instigators of this important marker of social equality. The aim of this study is to make a historic revision on the evolution of labor analgesia and to determine the role of the female community on that evolution. METHODS: A review of literature through Pubmed database and research of historical books on the subject. RESULTS: Epidural analgesia is nowadays a safe and effective technique, having evolved significantly over the last hundred years. The initial inhalatory anesthesia / analgesia presented risks to the mother and fetus, but they were the beginning of a long and necessary evolution. This review provides an overview on the advances and retreats of labor analgesia and the role of women in these changes. CONCLUSIONS: The female community had an active and pioneering role in labor analgesia development. Instigators like Queen Victoria or researchers as Virginia Apgar, women are inseparable from this development.Downloads
References
Melzach R, Taenzer P, Feldman P, Kinch RA. Labour is still painful after prepared childbirth training. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;125:357-63.
Anim-somuah M, Smyth R, Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:NoCD000331
Cambic C, Wong C. Labour analgesia and obstetric outcomes. BJA. 2010;105:50-60.
Hawkins JL. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46(3):679-87.
Bacon D. The Historical Narrative: Tales of Professionalism. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:97-74.
Simpson J. On the early history and progress of anaesthetic midwifery. In: Simpson J. Anaesthetic Midwifery: report on its early history and progress. Edinburg: Sutherland & Knox; 1848. p. 5-16
Caton D. The History of obstetric anesthesia. In: Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA. Obstetric Anesthesia Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 3-12.
Caton D. Obstetric Anesthesia: the first ten years. Anesthesiology. 1970;33:102-9.
Caton D, Frolich M, Euliano T. Anesthesia for childbirth: controversy and change. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):S25-30.
Caton D. John Snow´s practice of obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:247-52.
Cohen S. Strategies for labor pain relief – past, present and future. Acta Anaesth Scand. 1997;110:17-21.
Snow, J. Use of Chloroform. Lond J Med. 1849;1(1):50.
Boston Society for Medical Improvement. Report of a Committee of the Boston Society for Medical Improvement, On the Alleged Dangers which Accompany the Inhalation of the Vapor of Sulphuric Ether. Boston Med Surg J. 1861;65:229-54.
Caton D. In the present state of our knowledge – early use of opioids in obstetrics. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:779-84.
Caton D. Obstetric anesthesia and concepts of placental transport: a historical review of the nineteenth century. Anesthesiology. 1977;46:132-7.
Gogarten W, Aken H. A century of regional analgesia in obstetrics. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:773-5.
Foldes F, Colavincenzo J, Birch J. Epidural anesthesia: a reappraisal. Anesth Analg. 1956;35:33-7.
Chadwick H. Obstetric anesthesia – then and now. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2005;71:517-20.
Martini J, Bacon D, Vasdev G. Edward Tuohy: the man, his needle and its place in obstetric analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27(5):520-3.
Greenhill, J. Shall spinal anesthesia be used in obstetrics? Anesthesiology. 1950;11(3):283-8.
Chalmers J. Relief of pain in midwifery. BMJ. 1948;1(4552):661.
Moscucci O. Holistic obstetrics: the origins of natural childbirth in Britain. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79:168-73.
Hadfield J. Pain in childbirth. BMJ. 1948;1(4562):1155.
Calmes S. Virginia Apgar: at the forefront of obstetric anesthesia. ASA Newsletter. 1992;56:9-12.
Hong R. Less is more: the recent history of neuraxial labor analgesia. Am J Ther. 2010;17:492-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Scientia Medica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Scientia Medica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.