El Inventario Integral de Desempeño en el Trabajo
Desarrollo y Evidencias Iniciales de Validez
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2025.1.47098Palabras clave:
desempeño laboral, gestión del desempeño, desarrollo profesional, análisis gráfico exploratorio, análisis factorial confirmatorio, invariancia, Inventario Integral de Desempeño ProfesionalResumen
El desempeño profesional – un concepto central en la psicología organizacional y fundamental para gerentes y trabajadores en el lugar de trabajo – necesita definiciones y medidas más precisas que reflejen la complejidad del fenómeno en la práctica. El presente estudio presenta pruebas de evidencias válidas para el Inventario Integral de Desempeño Profesional, incluyendo la estructura interna, su relación con variables externas y la invariancia por género y supervisión. Los participantes fueron 648 adultos que trabajan en diferentes actividades en Brasil (56% hombres y 32% en puestos de supervisión). Realizamos dos ciclos de análisis gráfico exploratorio y análisis factorial confirmatorio para alcanzar el modelo final. El instrumento también incluyó un conjunto preliminar de preguntas que ayudaron a personalizar el contenido de varias preguntas. También probamos la correlación con el desarrollo profesional y la invariancia para género y supervisión. Partimos de un cuestionario de 54 ítems – precedido por un conjunto de preguntas para personalizar los ítems – y llegamos a un modelo de 25 ítems. La fiabilidad compuesta de las cinco dimensiones – Técnica, Comunicación, Coordinación de Colegas, Coordinación de Subordinados y Contraproducente – varió de 0,79 a 0,90. Este modelo mostró invariancia para género y supervisión y una buena correlación con la variable externa Desarrollo Profesional. Los resultados mostraron que la prueba tiene propiedades psicométricas adecuadas. Aplicamos una personalización amplia para reflejar mejor los contextos laborales de los participantes. Abordamos desafíos sustanciales en la evaluación del desempeño al abordar el fenómeno, buscando reflejar su complejidad teórica y operativamente. También encontramos una medida que podría captar las especificidades de un contexto laboral determinado y, al mismo tiempo, permitir comparaciones entre las dimensiones de desempeño de diferentes tipos de trabajadores.
Descargas
Citas
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 219–252. https://doi.org/10/f9f3sz DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.106
Andrade, É. G. S. A., Queiroga, F., & Valentini, F. (2020). Short version of self-assessment scale of job performance. Anales de Psicología, 36(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.402661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.402661
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687–732). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Campbell, J. P. (2012). Leadership, the old, the new, and the timeless: A commentary. In M. G. Rumsey (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0024
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Christensen, A. P., & Golino, H. (2021). Estimating the stability of psychological dimensions via bootstrap exploratory graph analysis: A monte carlo simulation and tutorial. Psych, 3(3), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030032
Culbertson, S. S., Henning, J. B., & Payne, S. C. (2013). Performance appraisal satisfaction: The role of feedback and goal orientation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(4), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000096
Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241
De Cremer, D., & Moore, C. (2020). Toward a better understanding of behavioral ethics in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 369–393. https://doi.org/10/ggx5ss DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015151
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421–433. https://doi.org/10/f9zrd5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085
Gartner. (2020). Performance management that delivers: Executive summary. Gartner. bit.ly/3IhOHwU
Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Bipp, T., & Verhagen, M. A. M. T. (2018). Individual job redesign: Job crafting interventions in healthcare. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 98–114. https://doi.org/10/ggcf69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.002
Gravina, N., Nastasi, J., & Austin, J. (2021). Assessment of employee performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 41(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2020.1869136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2020.1869136
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10/d8jrf6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
Habeeb, S. (2020). Assessment of behavior-based performance in banking and insurance sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(7), 1345–1371. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2019-0074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-02-2019-0074
Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2009). Marketing research: In a digital information environment (4th ed). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
International Labour Organization [ILO]. (2019). Women in business and management: The business case for change (p. 149). ILO.
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., van Buuren, S., van der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2013). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
Lee, J., Lim, S., & Oah, S. (2020). Effects of accurate and inaccurate feedback on work performance: The role of the awareness of inaccuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 40(1–2), 46–62. https://doi.org/10/ghrsqr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2020.1746472
Levy, P. E., Cavanaugh, C. M., Frantz, N. B., & Borden, L. A. (2018). Revisiting the social context of performance management: Performance appraisal effectiveness. In The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology (pp. 196–211). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914957.n10
McGee, H. M., & Crowley-Koch, B. J. (2021). Performance assessment of organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 41(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2021.1909687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2021.1909687
Motowidlo, S. J., & Kell, H. J. (2012). Job performance. In I. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 91–141). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop212005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.hop212005
Mourão, L. (2018). The role of leadership in the professional development of subordinates. In S. D. Göker (Ed.), Leadership (pp. 123–138). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.76056
Mourão, L., & Monteiro, A. C. (2018). Desenvolvimento profissional: Proposição de um modelo conceitual. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 23(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10/ggxf69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20180005
Mourão, L., Porto, J. B., & Puente-Palacios, K. (2014). Construção e evidências de validade de duas escalas de percepção de desenvolvimento profissional. Psico-USF, 19, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712014000100008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712014000100008
Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12259
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in mplus (4; Mplus Web Notes). https://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf
Pawirosumarto, S., Sarjana, P. K., & Gunawan, R. (2017). The effect of work environment, leadership style, and organizational culture towards job satisfaction and its implication towards employee performance in Parador Hotels and Resorts, Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1337−1358. https://doi.org/10/gd8fgw DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-10-2016-0085
Pitacho, L. A., Palma, P. J., & Correia, P. M. A. R. (2019). Work orientation: Dimensionality and internal model. Análise Psicológica, 37(4), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1667
Qu, J., & Yan, J. (2023). Working from home vs working from office in terms of job performance during the COVID‐19 pandemic crisis: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 61(1), 196–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12353
Sandall, H., & Mourão, L. (2020). Job Performance: Challenges for Workers and Managers. In F. Queiroga (Ed.), Home office guidelines in the COVID-19 pandemic (Vol. 1, pp. 19–25). Artmed. bit.ly/3JTtev7
Sandall, H., & Mourão, L. (2023). Individual job performance: Propositions for a personalized measurement and a comprehensive diagnosis. RAM: Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 24(3), eRAMG230023. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg230023.en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eramg230023.pt
Tordera, N., Montesa, D., & Martinolli, G. (2020). LMX and well-being: Psychological climates as moderators of their concurrent and lagged relationships. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 20(4), 1284–1295. https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2020.4.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2020.4.13
van Wingerden, J., Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). The impact of personal resources and job crafting interventions on work engagement and performance. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10/gf39jc DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21758
Vogel, D., Meyer, M., & Harendza, S. (2018). Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 157. https://doi.org/10/gdvrt3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1260-9
Wiernik, B. M., & Ones, D. S. (2018). Ethical employee behaviors in the consensus taxonomy of counterproductive work behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10/gcz8f8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12199
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Hugo Sandall, Luciana Mourão, Felipe Valentini, Jairo Eduardo Borges-Andrade, Fabiana Queiroga, Gardênia da Silva Abbad, Francisco Antônio Coelho Júnior
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
