Evidencia de Validez Convergente y Criterio para la Escala de Pro-Sociabilidad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2023.1.40466Palabras clave:
Altruismo, Empatia, Moral, Psicometría, Validación de TesteResumen
Esta investigación tiene como objetivo recopilar evidencias de validez a partir de la relación con otras variables del tipo convergente y criterio para la Escala de Pro-Sociabilidad (EPS). Participó en la investigación 397 personas, de 18 a 69 años (M = 36,88; DT = 12,86), ambos sexos, de diferentes regiones brasileñas. Se requirió un cuestionario sociodemográfico, la Escala de Altruismo y la Medida de Empatía Afectiva y Cognitiva. Se observaron asociaciones relacionadas entre las puntuaciones del instrumento EPS como medidas de altruismo y empatía, además de poder diferenciar grupos en cuanto a sexo, religión religiosa y participación en acciones voluntarias. Estos resultados son compatibles con la investigación disponible en la literatura internacional y pueden considerarse como evidencia de validación para un EPS.
Descargas
Citas
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education.
Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., & Stocks, E. L. (2015). The empathy—altruism hypothesis. In D. A. Schroeder, & W. G. Graziano (Eds.). The oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 259-281). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.023
Baumard, N., André, J.-B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(01), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11002202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002202
Benish-Weisman, M., Daniel, E., Sneddon, J., & Lee, J. (2019). The relations between values and prosocial behavior among children: The moderating role of age. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.019
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2014). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466
Dovidio, J. F., & Banfield, J. C. (2015). Prosocial behavior and empathy. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.24024-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24024-5
Dovidio, J. F., & Halabi, S. (2017). Altruism and prosocial behavior. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118430873.est0415
Eisenberg, N. (1982). The development of reasoning regarding prosocial behavior. In N. Eisenberg (Eds.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 219–249). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-234980-5.50014-6
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746135
Eisenberg, N. (1992). The caring child. Harvard University Press.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial Development. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 646-718). John Wiley & Sons Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Murphy, B. C., Jones, S., & Guthrie, I. K. (1998). Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children's sympathy from dispositional regulation and emotionality. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.34.5.910
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In M. E. Lamb, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (pp. 610–656). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy315
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.101.1.91
Falconer, C. J, Lobmaier J. S., Christoforou, M., Kamboj, S. K., King, J. A., Gilbert, P., & Brewin, C. R. (2019) Compassionate faces: Evidence for distinctive facial expressions associated with specific prosocial motivations. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210283
Foulkes, L., Leung, J. T., Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2018). Age differences in the prosocial influence effect. 21(6), e12666. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666
Hofmann, V., & Müller, C. M. (2018). Avoiding antisocial behavior among adolescents: The positive influence of classmates’ prosocial behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 68, 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.013
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2020). Síntese de Indicadores Sociais – SIS. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/9221-sintese-de-indicadores-sociais.html?=&t=o-que-e
Kamas, L., & Preston, A. (2020). Empathy, gender, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 92, 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101654
Kaur, J. (2020). Effect of Religiosity and Moral Identity Internalization on Prosocial Behaviour. Journal of Human Values, 26(2), 097168582090140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685820901402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685820901402
Koller, S. H., & Bernardes, N. M. G. (1997). Desenvolvimento moral pró-social: Semelhanças e diferenças entre os modelos teóricos de Eisenberg e Kohlberg. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 2(2), 223-262. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X1997000200002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X1997000200002
Korndorfer, M., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2015). A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. Electronic Journal, 10(7), e0133193. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2704303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133193
Livi, S., De Cristofaro, V., Theodorou, A., Rullo, M., Piccioli, V., & Pozzi, M. (2019). When motivation is not enough: Effects of prosociality and organizational socialization in volunteers’ intention to continue volunteering. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2446
Longobardi, E., Spataro, P. & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2019). Direct and indirect associations of empathy, theory of mind, and language with prosocial behavior: Gender differences in primary school children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(6), 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2019.1653817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2019.1653817
Nielson, M. G., Padilla-Walker, L., & Holmes, E. K. (2017). Corrigendum to “How do men and women help? Validation of a multidimensional measure of prosocial behavior”. Journal of Adolescence, 59(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.05.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.006
Noronha, A. P. P., Dias-Viana, J. L., Batista, H. H. V., de Souza, M. H., Campos, A. M. de B., Theotonio, M., Pio, J. L. S, Vanni, P., Queiroz, L. G., & Corbett, J. dos S. (no prelo). Construção e evidências de validade com base na estrutura interna da Escala de Pro-Sociabilidade. Gerais: Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia.
Pacico, J. C., & Hutz, C. S. (2016). Altruísmo. In C. S. Hutz (Ed.), Avaliação em psicologia positiva: Técnicas e Medidas (pp. 141-152). CETEPP Hogrefe.
Piatak, J. S., & Holt, S. B. (2019). Prosocial behaviors: A matter of altruism or public service motivation? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 504-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz041
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771-784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
Reis, S. S. P. (2017). Empatia afetiva e cognitiva e o fenótipo ampliado do autismo: Adaptação transcultural e validação de medida [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal da Bahia]. https://repositorio.ufba.br/handle/ri/25216
Rushton, P J., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, C. G. (1981). The altruistic personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(81)90084-2
Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Harrell, A. (2017). The enforcement of moral boundaries promotes cooperation and prosocial behavior in groups. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42844 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42844
Son, D., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2019). Happy helpers: A multidimensional and mixed-method approach to prosocial behavior and its effects on friendship quality, mental health, and well-being during adolescence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(5), 1705–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00154-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00154-2
Tirri, K, Moran. S., & Mariano, J. M. (2016). Education for purposeful teaching around the world. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(5), 526-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1226551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1226551
Vachon, D. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2015). Fixing the problem with empathy: Development and validation of the affective and cognitive measure of empathy. Assessment, 23(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114567941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114567941
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2017). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Psico
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Psico implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Psico como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada.
