The problem of the whole-parts relationship in Hegel’s Logic of Essence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2020.1.34836

Keywords:

Relationship Whole. Parts. Condition. Antinomy

Abstract

The goal of my article is to present the whole-part relationship in the context of Hegel’s Doctrine of Essence (1813). After a short overview of the variety of contexts in which the whole-parts relationship is debated nowadays, both within and without the domain of Hegelian studies, I will focus on the logic of essence in order to analyze the first division (A.) of the third chapter (“the essential relationship”) of the second section (“The appearance”) of the book. As a result, my essay is expected to clarify a conceptual pair that is often used as a hermeneutical passe-partout in order to either defend or reject Hegel’s philosophy, based on the alleged Hegelian primacy of the whole over the parts. I will argue that the negative thesis of the logic of essence is that both the primacy of the parts over the whole and the primacy of the whole over the parts are unsustainable. Finally, the argument for this conclusion will entail a close examination of the Remark, which is devoted to a dialectical diagnosis of the second antinomy of the Critique of Pure Reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Federico Orsini, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA), Lavras, MG

Professor Visitante na Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA, Lavras, MG, Brasil).

References

ADORNO, T.W. Skoteinos oder Wie zu lesen sei. In: Drei Studien zu Hegel (1963). Gesammelte Schriften. Band 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1970.

ARANTES, P. Hegel. A ordem do tempo. Tradução de Rubens Rodrigues Torres. São Paulo: Editora Hucitec, 2000.

BECKENKAMP, J. Ceticismo e Idealismo alemão. Com a tradução do texto de Hegel “Relação do ceticismo com a filosofia” (1802). Edições Loyola: 2019.

BIARD, J. et al. Introduction à la lecture de la Science de la logique de Hegel. II La Dcotrine de l’essence. Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1983. p. 246-256.

BERTO, F., PLEBANI, M. Ontology and Metaontology: A Contemporary Guide. Bloomsbury Academic: 2015.

BRANDOM, R. Articulating Reasons. An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028739

CHIEREGHIN, F. Il Parmenide di Platone alle origini della dialettica hegeliana, Verifiche, v. XXIV, n.3-4, 1995, pp.243-271.

CORTI, L. Ritratti hegeliani. Un capitolo della filosofia americana contemporanea. Roma: Carocci, 2014.

FERRARIN, A. Hegel and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498107

FERRARIN, A. Il pensare e l’io. Hegel e la critica di Kant. Roma: Carocci, 2016.

HEGEL, G.W.F. Das Verhältnis des Skeptizismus zur Philosophie. In: Werke in zwanzig Bänden (=W). MOLDENHAUEr E., Michel M. (org.). Band 2. Jenaer Schriften, pp. 213-272. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1969.

HEGEL, G.W.F. Enciclopédia das Ciências Filosóficas em Compêndio (1830). Tradução de Paulo Meneses. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 1995. Vol. 1. Ciência da Lógica.

HEGEL, G.W.F. Ciência da Lógica. 1. A Doutrina do Ser. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2016.

HEGEL, G.W.F. Ciência da Lógica. 2. A Doutrina da Essência. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2017.

HEIDEMANN, D. Die Lehre vom Wesen. Zweiter Abschnitt. Die Erscheinung. In: QUANTE, Michael, MOOREN, Nadine (Hgg.). Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. Hegel-Studien, Beiheft 67. Hamburg: Meiner, 2018, p. 325-386.

IBER, C. Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität. Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln der Wesenslogik. De Gruyter: 1990. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872866 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872866

JARCZYK, G. Monisme oui, monisme non. In: HEGELIANA, P.J.; LABARRIÈRE, Jarczyk, G. (org.) Paris: PUF, 1986. p. 347-361.

KREINES, J. Reason in the World. Hegel’s Metaphysics and Its Philosophical Appeal. London-New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204303.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204303.001.0001

ORSINI, F. “Donde vêm os múltiplos? A análise do uno na lógica do ser para si. In: BAVARESCO, A; PERTILLE, J.; MIRANDA, L.M.; TAUCHEN, J. (org.).Leituras da Lógica de Hegel. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2017, p. 163-182.

PIPPIN, R. Hegel’s Realm of Shadows. Logic as Metaphysics in the Science of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226588841.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226588841.001.0001

SCHÄFER, R. Die Dialektik und ihre besondere Formen in Hegels Logik. Hegel-Studien. Beiheft 45. Hamburg: Meiner, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28937/978-3-7873-2214-5

SCHMIDT, K. Georg W.F. Hegel. Wissenschaft der Logik – Die Lehre vom Wesen. Ein einführender Kommentar. Paderborn, München, Wien, Zürich: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1997.

WINFIELD, R.D. Hegel’s Science of Logic. A Critical Rethinking in Thirty Lectures. New York: Rowman&Littlefield. 2012.

Published

2020-05-15

How to Cite

Orsini, F. (2020). The problem of the whole-parts relationship in Hegel’s Logic of Essence. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 65(1), e34836. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2020.1.34836