O que é agência epistêmica, afinal?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.3.28442Palabras clave:
Agência, Racionalidade Epistêmica, Racionalidade Prática, Conhecimento.Resumen
Neste artigo examino a possibilidade de agência no domínio epistêmico – a visão compartilhada por muitos filósofos de que possamos ser ativos, ao invés de passivos, em relação às nossas crenças e manifestações de conhecimento. Concluo que a noção de agência epistêmica é plausível apenas em sentido indireto, referindo-se as diferentes ações que realizamos com intuito de melhorar nossos compromissos epistêmicos. Trata-se de um tipo de agência prática, como qualquer agência, mas que não nos autoriza a pensar que possamos estar agindo de alguma maneira quando cremos ou conhecemos.
Descargas
Citas
ALSTON, W. The reliability of sense perception. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.
ANSCOMBE, G. E .M. Intention, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957.
AUDI, R. ‘Acting for Reasons,’ Philosophical Review, 95(4), p. 511–46, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2185049
BRATMAN, M. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
BROOME, J. Rationality through reasoning. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609088
BROWN, J. ‘Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning.” Nous, 42, p. 167-89, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00677.x
CHISHOLM, R. ‘Human Freedom and the Self,’ The Lindley Lectures, Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas; reprinted in Free Will, 2nd edition, G. WATSON (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 26–37, 1964.
CLIFFORD, W. K. ‘The ethics of belief,’ in T. Madigan, (ed.), The ethics of belief and other essays, Amherst, MA: Prometheus, 70–961877 [1999].
DAVIDSON, D. ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes,’ reprinted in Davidson 1980, p. 3–20, 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246270.003.0001
____. ‘Mental Events,’ in L. FOSTER and W. SWANSON (eds.) Experience and Theory. Humanities Press, p. 79-101, 1970.
____. ‘Freedom to Act,’ reprinted in Davidson 1980, p. 63–81, 1973.
____. Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
ENGEL, P. ‘Is Epistemic Agency Possible?,’ Philosophical Issues, 23, p. 157-178, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12008
FELDMAN, R. ‘The Ethics of Belief’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LX, p. 667-695, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2653823
FOLEY, R. ‘Evidence and reasons for belief,’ Analysis, 51, p. 98-102, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/51.2.98
_____ Working Without a Net. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
GINET, C. On Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
GOLDMAN, A. A Theory of Human Action. Princeton University Press, 1970.
HAWTHORNE, J. and STANLEY, J. ‘Knowledge and action,’ The Journal of Philosophy, 105, p. 571–90, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20081051022
HETHERINGTON, S. How To Know: A Practicalist Conception of Knowledge. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118083178
____.‘Skeptical Challenges and Knowing Actions,’ Philosophical Issues, 23, Epistemic Agency, p. 18-39, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12002
HOOKWAY, C. ‘Epistemic Akrasia and Epistemic Virtue’, in A.
FAIRWEATHER and L. ZAGZEBSKI (eds.) Virtue Epismology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford University Press, p. 178:99, 2001.
HYMAN, J. ‘How Knowledge works,’ The philosophical Quarterly, 49 (19), p. 433-451, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00152
JAMES, W. The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, New York: Longmans, Green, and Co, p. 1–25, 1896 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/11061-001
KAVKA, G. ‘The Toxin Puzzle,’ Analysis, 43, p. 33–6, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/43.1.33
LITTLEJOHN, C. ‘The Unity of Reason,’ in C. LITTLEJOHN and J. TURRI (eds.) Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion. Oxford University Press, p. 135-54, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660025.003.0008
LOWE, E. J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217144.001.0001
LYNCH, M. ‘Epistemic Commitments, Epistemic Agency and Practical Reasons,’ Philosophical Issues, 23, p. 343-62, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12018
MELDEN, A. I. Free Action, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.
MELE, A. Motivation and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019515617X.001.0001
NAGEL, J. ‘Knowledge as a Mental State’, Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 4, p. 275-310, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672707.003.0010
O’BRIEN, L. Self-Knowing Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261482.001.0001
PARFIT, D. On What Matters. Oxford: Oxford Universisty Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199572809.001.0001
PERCIVAL, P. ‘Epistemic Consequentialism,’ The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 76 (1), p. 121-151, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00092
RYLE, G. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson, 1949.
SCANLON, T. What we owe to each other, Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1998
SCHLOSSER, M. E. ‘Agency,’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (first Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/agency/, 2015.
SCHROEDER, M., ‘The Ubiquity of State-Given Reasons,’ Ethics, 122( 3), p. 457–488, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/664753
SEHON, S. Teleological Realism: Mind, Agency, and Explanation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
SETIYA, K. ‘Epistemic Agency: Some Doubts,’ Philosophical Issues, 23 (1), p. 179-198, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12009
SIDGWICK, H. The Methods of Ethics. London: MacMillan, 1874.
SOSA, E. ‘Knowing Full Well. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691143972.003.0001
STANLEY, J. and WILLIAMSON, T. ‘Knowing how.’ The Journal of Philosophy, 98, p. 411–44, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2678403
SUIKKANEN, J. ‘Introduction”, in J. SUIKKANEN and J. COTTINGHAM (eds.) Essays on Derek Parfit’s On What Matters, Willey-Balckwell, p. 1-20, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444322880.ch1
TAYLOR, R. Action and Purpose, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
VELLEMAN, D. ‘What Happens when Someone Acts?,’ Mind, 101, p. 461–481, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/101.403.461
____. The possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.
WILLIAMSON, T. Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
____. ‘Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism, and Knowledge of Knowledge,’ Philosophical Quarterly. 55, p. 213: 35, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00396.x
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Revista Veritas implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Revista Veritas como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS
