System and syllogism in Marx’s Capital

Authors

  • Agemir Bavaresco Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Eduardo Garcia Lara Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.1.26263

Keywords:

Syllogism, System, Political Economy, New Dialectics.

Abstract

Hegel's and Marx's intellectual undertakings remain relevant to an examination of our world. Both authors have elaborated, from different approaches, on important elements concerning modern capitalist societies. Tracing the precise connections between both thinkers, nevertheless, is still a challenge—even though it is now clear that these relationships are not one of idealism versus materialism, but, precisely, the overcoming of such dualism, as Western Marxism and Critical Theory have shown. In its Anglophone version, those inquiries grew and expanded upon different trends, among those, remarkably, New Dialectics. This article aims to analyze Hegel's theory of syllogism as a key to reading Marx's Capital as it has been proposed by Tony Smith. To this end, the paper seeks to reconstruct Smith's interpretation of Hegel’s theory of syllogism and its applications for Hegel's Philosophy of Right as well as to Marx’s Capital. According to Smith, Marx's Capital, the presentation of the dialectical articulations of the categories of political economy in the capitalist mode of production as a specific social order, derives its critical power and scientific coherence precisely from its use of Hegel’s theory of syllogism—which allows Marx to analyze the processes in the social world as organic entities constituted through the articulation of moments of universality, particularity, and individuality. The result is an investigation that seeks to bring Hegel's Logic closer to Marx’s Capital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Agemir Bavaresco, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutor em Filosofia pela Université Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne - 1997). Pós-Doutorado na Fordham University (USA/NY - 2009). Possui mestrado em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (1993), graduação em Filosofia pela Universidade Católica de Pelotas (1978), graduação em Teologia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (2010) e Bacharelado em Direito pela Universidade Católica de Pelotas (2007). Atualmente é professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Pesquisa nas áreas de Filosofia Política, Ética, Filosofia Moderna, Teorias da Justiça e Filosofia do Direito. Dedica-se ao trabalho de atualização do tema Democracia e Opinião Pública.

References

FRASER, I.; BURNS, T. Introduction: An Historical Survey of the Hegel–Marx Connection. In: BURNS, T.; FRASER, I. (Eds.). The Hegel-Marx connection. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000. p. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230595934_1

HARTMANN, K. Die Ontologische Option. Zeitschrift für Philosophische

Forschung, v. 33, n. 4, p. 638–641, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1979.33.4.638

____. Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View. In: Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. [s.l.: s.n.], 1972, p. 101–24.

HEGEL, G. W. F. Enciclopédia das Ciências Filosóficas em Compêndio (1830): I - A ciência da lógica. Tradução, notas, glossário e bibliografia de Paulo Meneses et alii. 2. ed. São Paulo: Loyola, 2005.

____. Linhas Fundamentais da Filosofia do Direito ou Direito Natural e Ciência do Estado em Compêndio. Tradução, notas, glossário e bibliografia de Paulo Meneses et alii. Recife, PE: UNICAP; São Paulo, SP: Loyola; São Leopoldo: UNISINOS, 2010.

____. A teoria hegeliana do silogismo: tradução e comentário. Tradução Federico Orsini. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2016.

LEVINE, N. Divergent Paths: The Hegelian foundations of Marx’s method. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006.

MARX, K. O capital: crítica da economia política; livro primeiro - o processo de produção do capital. Tradução Rubens Enderle. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial, 2013.

PINKARD, T. P. Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1988.

____. The Logic of Hegel’s Logic. Journal of the History of Philosophy, v. 17, n. 4, p. 417–435, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2008.0205

SMITH, T. The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticisms. New York, NY: SUNY Press, 1990.

____. Dialectical Social Theory and Its Critics: From Hegel to Analytical Marxism and Postmodernism. New York, NY: SUNY Press, 1993.

____. The Role of Ethics in Social Theory: Essays from a Habermasian Perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.

____. Hegel, Marx and the Comprehension of Capitalism. In: MOSELEY, F.; SMITH, T. (Eds.). Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic. Leiden: Brill, 2014. p. 15–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004270022_003

Published

2017-05-22

How to Cite

Bavaresco, A., & Lara, E. G. (2017). System and syllogism in Marx’s Capital. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 62(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.1.26263

Issue

Section

Teorias da justiça