Evaluation of medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2024.1.45474Keywords:
coxiella burnetii, medical knowledge, neglected diseases, one health, Q feverAbstract
Aims: evaluate the medical professionals’ knowledge about Q fever, seeking integrative contributions to public health that may favor the formulation of policies and the development of strategies based on a One Health approach. Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever. Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach. Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease.
Methods: this is a cross-sectional and quantitative study with data collection through a structured questionnaire applied face-to-face to physicians from various clinical specialties working at the three levels of health care in Brazil. The questionnaire consisted of 25 questions, seven of which were specific to assessing knowledge about Q fever. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess whether the variables medical specialty, level of health care in which they work, age range and gender were associated with a correct answer to at least one specific question about Q fever.
Results: among the 254 physicians included, 236 (92.9%) were unaware of Q fever. Only three (16.6%) of the 18 who correctly answered at least one specific question about the disease had a score of more than 50%. The highest rates of correct answers for at least one question (p < 0.0001) occurred among the medical specialties most related to clinical signs and symptoms or the differential diagnosis of Q fever and among males. It is highlighted that 85.8% of physicians consider Q fever a neglected and underreported disease in Brazil. Additionally, all physicians responded that they were not aware of the One Health approach.
Conclusions: the almost total lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding Q fever reinforces the need for greater disclosure for this zoonosis with a One Health approach in Medical Schools, in Residency Programs and for physicians in general. In addition, the inclusion of Q fever in the national list of notifiable diseases becomes relevant, allowing a better understanding of its epidemiological situation in Brazil. Finally, effective public health actions must be carried out to avoid underdiagnosis and the development of severe cases of the disease.
Downloads
References
Laing G, Vigilato MA, Cleaveland S, Thumbi SM, Blumberg L, Salahuddin N, et al. One health for neglected tropical diseases. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115:182-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/traa117
Meurer IR, Silva MR, Silva MV, Duré AÍ, Adelino TÉ, Costa AV, Vanelli CP, et al. Seroprevalence estimate and risk factors for coxiella burnetii infections among humans in a highly urbanised brazilian state. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022;116(3):261-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trab113
Madariaga MG, Rezai K, Trenholme GM, Weinstein RA. Q fever: a biological weapon in your backyard. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(11):709-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00804-1
Long CM. Q Fever vaccine development: current strategies and future considerations. Pathogens. 2021;10(10):1223. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101223
Garrett BC, Hart J. The A to Z of nuclear, biological and chemical warfare. United Kingdom: Scarecrow Press; 2009. 302 p.
Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, et al. From Q fever to coxiella burnetii infection: a paradigm change. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:115-90. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00045-16
Fasemore AM, Helbich A, Walter MC, Dandekar T, Vergnaud G, Förstner KU, et al. CoxBase: an online platform for epidemiological surveillance, visualization, analysis, and typing of coxiella burnetii genomic sequences. mSystems. 2021;6(6):e0040321. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00403-21
Siciliano RF, Ribeiro HB, Furtado RH, Castelli JB, Sampaio RO, Santos FC, et al. Endocardite por coxiella burnetii (febre Q): doença rara ou pouco diagnosticada? Relato de caso. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2008;41(4):409-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822008000400017
Mioni MS, Henker LC, Teixeira WS, Lorenzett MP, Labruna MB, Pavarini SP, et al. Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in aborted bovine fetuses in Brazil. Acta Trop. 2022;227:106258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106258
Salifu SP, Bukari AA, Frangoulidis D, Wheelhouse N. Current perspectives on the transmission of Q fever: Highlighting the need for a systematic molecular approach for a neglected disease in Africa. Acta Trop. 2019;193:99-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.02.032
Sahu R, Rawool DB, Dhaka P, Yadav JP, Mishra SP, Kumar M, et al. Current perspectives on the occurrence of Q fever: highlighting the need for systematic surveillance for a neglected zoonotic disease in Indian subcontinent. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2021;13:138-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12918
Maurin M, Raoult D. Q Fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(4):518-53. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.12.4.518
Angelakis E, Raoult D. Q fever. Vet Microbiol. 2010;140:297-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.016
Million M, Walter G, Thuny F, Habib G, Raoult D. Evolution from acute Q fever to endocarditis is associated with underlying valvulopathy and age and can be prevented by prolonged antibiotic treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(6):836-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit419
França DA, Kmetiuk LB, Panazzolo GA, Domingues OJ, Silva FP, Biondo LM, et al. Serosurvey of coxiella burnetii in descendants of former black slaves (quilombola communities) of southern Brazil. Microorganisms. 2024;12(1):92. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010092
Mioni MS, Costa FB, Ribeiro BL, Teixeira WS, Pelicia VC, Labruna MB, et al. Coxiella burnetii in slaughterhouses in Brazil: a public health concern. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0241246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241246
França DA, Mioni MS, Fornazari F, Duré AÍ, Silva MV, Possebon FS, et al. Seropositivity for coxiella burnetii in suspected patients with dengue in São Paulo state, Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(5):e0010392. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010392
Rozental T, Faria LS, Forneas D, Guterres A, Ribeiro JB, Araújo FR, et al. First molecular detection of coxiella burnetii in brazilian artisanal cheese: a neglected food safety hazard in ready-to-eat raw-milk product. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020;24:208-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2020.05.003
Damasceno IA, Guerra RC. Coxiella burnetii e a febre Q no Brasil, uma questão de saúde pública. Cien Saude Colet. 2018;23(12):4231-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182312.27772016
Mares-Guia MA, Rozental T, Guterres A, Gomes R, Almeida DN, Moreira NS, et al. Molecular identification of the agent of Q fever - coxiella burnetii - in domestic animals in state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2014;47(2):231-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0076-2013
Cajaiba-Soares AM, Martinez-Silveira MS, Miranda DL, Fernandes RC, Reis MG. Healthcare workers' knowledge about chagas disease: a systematic review. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;104(5):1631-8. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1199
Lugo-Caballero CI, Dzul-Rosado K, Dzul-Tut I, Balam-May Á, Zavala-Castro J. Conocimiento de enfermedades transmitidas por vectores (dengue, rickettsiosis y enfermedad de Chagas) en médicos. Gac Med Mex. 2017;153:321-8. https://www.anmm.org.mx/GMM/2017/n3/GMM_153_2017_3_321-328.pdf
Gönen I, Soysal A, Topuzoğlu A, Bakir M. Clinical knowledge and attitudes of turkish physicians toward rabies caused by animal bites. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64(5):382-90. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/yoken/64/5/64_64.382/_pdf/-char/en
Bajaj DR, Matlani BL, Soomro FR, Iqbal MP. Knowledge, attitude and practices regarding leprosy among general practitioners at hyderabad. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009;19(4):215-8. https://jcpsp.pk/archive/2009/Apr2009/04.pdf
Schneeberger PM, Wintenberger C, van der Hoek W, Stahl JP. Q fever in the Netherlands - 2007-2010: what we learned from the largest outbreak ever. Med Mal Infect. 2014;44(8):339-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2014.02.006
Fernandes J, Lemos ER. The multifaceted Q fever epidemiology: a call to implement one health approach in latin america. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023;20:100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100463
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Scientia Medica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Scientia Medica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Scientia Medica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
