Relationship between the school backpack load and university students’ posture

Authors

  • Thiago Pereira Veronese Department of Physical Therapy, School of Technology and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP). Presidente Prudente, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-7632
  • Iracimara de Anchieta Messias Department of Planning, Urban Planning and Environment, School of Technology and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP). Presidente Prudente, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-3841
  • Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro Department of Physical Education, School of Technology and Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP). Presidente Prudente, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-9992
  • Dalva Minonroze Albuquerque Ferreira Department of Physical Therapy, School of Technology and Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP). Presidente Prudente, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-3757

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.33440

Keywords:

Posture, weight-bearing, young adult, spine.

Abstract

AIMS: To relate the effect of progressive increases in the load of the school backpack with the posture of university students.
METHOD: Twenty-six female university students from the physiotherapy course, aged between 18 and 25 years, were evaluated. Loads of 0%, 3%, 5%, 7%, and 10% of the volunteers’ body weight were placed in a backpack on the shoulders of the volunteers. Next, images were captured in the right sagittal plane, processed through Postural Assessment Software (SAPO). The statistical analyzes were performed using Analysis of Variance test.
RESULTS: The results obtained demonstrated significant differences in the angles between the elbow and the anterior superior iliac spine when carrying 7% compared to 0% (p=0.001); and the acromion and anterior superior iliac spine comparing 7% with 0%, (p=0.032). In the other measurements, there were no significant differences.
CONCLUSION: Loads from 7% of body weight are sufficient to promote postural changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Delgado RDCM, Berto R. Distribuição da força plantar em relação ao peso e posicionamento do material escolar. Rev Elet Educ Ciênc. 2015;5(1):25-32.

Borges LF, Rodrigues RB, Valente PHF, Nogueira MS, Araújo RF, Alves FAVB, Monteiro APF, Alves AG. Análise postural de alunos de 10 a 12 anos do colégio estadual Américo Antunes, em São Luís de Montes Belos/Go. Rev Elet Fac Montes Belos. 2016;8(3).

Dianat I, Sorkhi N, Pourhossein A, Alipour A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Neck, shoulder and low back pain in secondary schoolchildren in relation to schoolbag carriage: should the recommended weight limits be gender-specific? Appl Ergon. 2014;45(3):437-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.06.003

Shymon SJ, Yaszay B, Dwek JR, Proudfoot JA, Donohue M, Hargens AR. Altered disc compression in children with idiopathic low back pain: an upright MRI backpack study. Spine. 2014;39(3):243. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000114

Pereira AS, Toigo AM. O peso da mochila escolar relacionado ao peso da criança: análise em alunos de 1º ao 5º ano do ensino fundamental de uma escola particular de Canoa/RS, Brasil. Rev Aten Saúde. 2014;11(38):16-24. https://doi.org/10.13037/rbcs.vol11n38.1960

Hestbaek L, Leboeuf-Y C, Kyvik KO, Manniche C. The course of low back pain from adolescence to adulthood: eight-year follow-up of 9600 twins. Spine. 2006;31(4):468-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000199958.04073.d9

Batista ITS, de Melo-Marins D, Carvalho RGS, Gomes LE. Peso e modo de transporte do material escolar no ensino fundamental I: efeito dos anos escolares e do sexo. Fisioter Pesqui. 2016;23(2):210-5.

Silva CB, Naves, ÉA, Beneti GC, Guedes LMD. Influências do peso da mochila escolar em estudantes do ensino fundamental: uma revisão bibliográfica. Rev Méd Minas Gerais, Cidade. 2015;25(2):233-6.

Quixadá AP, Ramalho P, Baptista AF, Mendes SMD, Aragão JH, Sá KN. Alterações posturais associadas ao uso de mochilas em escolares. Rev Pesqui Fisioter. 2015;1(1). https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.v1i1.79

Ries LG, Martinello M, Medeiros M, Cardoso M, Santos GM. Os efeitos de diferentes pesos de mochila no alinhamento postural de crianças em idade escolar. Motricidade. 2012;8(4):87-95. https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.8(4).1556

Luz Filho CA, Luz KRG, Costa FBS, Vasconcelos JPL, Silva DR. Relação entre peso e transporte da mochila escolar e alterações posturais em escolares de Caxias-MA. Rev Ciênc Saberes Facema. 2015;1(2):124-9.

Arias AV, Silva ACO, de Camargo MC. Mochila escolar: investigação quanto ao peso carregado pelas crianças. Fisioter Bras. 2013;376.

Souza JA, Pasinato F, Basso D, Corrêa ECR, Silva AMTD. Biofotogrametria confiabilidade das medidas do protocolo do software para avaliação postural (SAPO). Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(4):299-305. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n4p299

Walicka-Cupryś K, Skalska-Izdebska R, Rachwał M, Truszczyńska A. Influence of the weight of a school backpack on spinal curvature in the sagittal plane of seven-year-old children. Bio Med Res Int. 2015:817913. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/817913

Lanes TC, Gauron EF, Spratt KF, Wernimont TJ, Found EM, Weinstein JN. Long-term follow-up of patients with chronic back pain treated in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Spine. 1995;20(7):801-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199504000-00012

Arias AV, Apolinário A, Troster MMRP, Chimello ACR, Carbone ESM, Gimenes RO. O impacto da mochila escolar na marcha: uma revisão de literatura. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov. 2019;26(4):170-80.

Kistner F, Fiebert I, Roach K, Moore J. Postural compensations and subjective complaints due to backpack loads and wear time in schoolchildren. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2013;25(1):15-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31827ab2f7

Downloads

Published

2019-10-21

How to Cite

Veronese, T. P., Messias, I. de A., Christofaro, D. G. D., & Ferreira, D. M. A. (2019). Relationship between the school backpack load and university students’ posture. Scientia Medica, 29(3), e33440. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.33440

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)