Deep Blue vs. Kasparov: The Rematch

Authors

  • Lenara Verle Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.1998.9.3011

Keywords:

Communication, artificial intelligence, robot

Abstract

The fact that IBM chess computer Deep Blue won the world champion, Garry Kasparov, in May 1997 (in a series of 5 matches, Kasparov won one, drew two and lost two more) led to the appearance of Several comments on the theme "man vs. machine". A year earlier Kasparov had played with an older version of Deep Blue and won the five-game series (despite losing his first match - his first loss to a computer). The tone of the comments was then of general relief: we were still "superior" to the machine - at least in chess.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lenara Verle, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

Master's degree in Communication at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul

References

BAUDRILLARD, Jean. Tela Total. Porto Alegre, 1997. Editora Sulina.

IBM CORPORATION. Kasparov x Deep Blue: The Rematch. 1997. Disponível em: http://www.chess.ibm.com

TURKLE, Sherry. Life on the screen. New York, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2008-04-10

How to Cite

Verle, L. (2008). Deep Blue vs. Kasparov: The Rematch. Revista FAMECOS, 5(9), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.1998.9.3011

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 9 (1998)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

The submission of originals to Revista Famecos implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Famecos as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.