Critical Theory between Marx and Honneth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.32249Keywords:
Marx, Honneth, Critical theory, Recognition, Functionalism, Social labour, Division of labour.Abstract
In this paper, I consider the main Marxist objections to Honneth’s model of critical social theory, and Honneth’s key objections to Marx-inspired models. I then seek to outline a rapprochement between the two positions, by showing how Honneth’s normative concept of recognition is not antithetical to functionalist arguments, but in fact contains a social-theoretical dimension, the idea that social reproduction and social evolution revolve around struggles around the interpretation of core societal norms. By highlighting the social theoretical side of recognition, one can outline a model of critical social theory that in fact corresponds to the descriptive and normative features outlined by Marx himself. However, the price of this rapprochement for Honnethian critical theory is a greater emphasis on the division of labour as the central mechanism of social reproduction.
Downloads
References
BADER, Veit. Misrecognition, power and democracy. In: Bart van den Brink; David Owen (orgs.). Recognition and power. Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 238-269.
BORMAN, David A. Labour, exchange and recognition: Marx contra Honneth. Philosophy & Social Criticism, v. 35, n. 8, p. 935-959, 2009 <10.1177/0191453709340637>.
BRUDNEY, Daniel. Producing for others. In: Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch; Christopher F. Zurn (Orgs.). The philosophy of recognition. Historical and philosophical perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2010. p. 151-188.
CHITTY, Andrew. Species-being and capital. In: Andrew Chitty; Martin McIvor (orgs.). Karl Marx and contemporary philosophy. London: Palgrave McMillan, 2009. p. 123-142.
DEJOURS, Christophe; DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. The centrality of work. Critical Horizons, v. 11, n. 2, p. 167-180, 2010 <10.1558/crit.v11i2.167>.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. Les horizons marxistes de l’éthique de la reconnaissance. Actuel Marx, v. 28, n. 2, p. 159-178, 2005 <10.3917/amx.038.0159>.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. Work and the precarisation of existence. European Journal of Social Theory, v. 11, n. 4, p. 443-463, 2008 <10.1177/1368431008097011>.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. Beyond communication. A critical study of Axel Honneth’s social philosophy. Leiden: Brill, 2009a.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. Critique of political economy and contemporary critical theory. In: Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch; Christopher F. Zurn (orgs.). The philosophy of recognition. Historical and philosophical perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2009b. p. 285-317.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe; RENAULT, Emmanuel. Politicising Honneth’s ethics of recognition. Thesis Eleven, v. 88, n. 1, p. 92-111, 2007 <10.1177/0725513607072459>.
DUFOUR, Frédéric Guillaume; PINEAULT, Éric. Quelle théorie du capitalisme pour quelle théorie de la reconnaissance? Politique et Sociétés, v. 28, n. 3, p. 75-99, 2007 <10.7202/039005ar>.
DUMÉNIL, Gérard; LÉVY, Dominique. Capital resurgent. Roots of the neoliberal revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
FISCHBACH, Franck. Les manuscrits economico-philosophiques de 1844. Paris: Vrin, 2007.
FISCHBACH, Franck. Manifeste pour une philosophie sociale. Paris: La Découverte, 2009a.
FISCHBACH, Franck. Sans objet: capitalisme, subjectivité, Aliénation. Paris: Vrin, 2009b.
FRASER, Nancy; HONNETH, Axel. Redistribution or recognition? A politicalphilosophical exchange. London: Verso, 2003.
HABER, Stéphane. L’aliénation: vie sociale et expérience de la dépossession. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2007.
HABER, Stéphane. L’homme dépossédé: une tradition critique de Marx à Honneth. Paris: Presses du CNRS, 2009.
HABER, Stéphane. Penser le néocapitalisme: vie, capital et aliénation. Paris: Les Prairies ordinaires, 2013.
HARTMANN, Martin; HONNETH, Axel. Paradoxes of capitalism. Constellations, v. 13, n. 1, p. 41-58, 2006 <10.1111/j.1351-0487.2006.00439.x>.
HARVEY, David. A brief history of liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
HARVEY, David. The limits to capital. London: Verso, 2007.
HOLLOWAY, John. Change the world without taking power: the meaning of revolution today. London: Pluto Press, 2002.
HONNETH, Axel. The critique of power. Reflective stages in a critical social theory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
HONNETH, Axel. Max Horkheimer and the sociological deficit of critical theory. In: Seyla Benhabib; Wolfgang Bonss; John McCole (orgs.). On Max Horkheimer: new perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993. p. 187-214.
HONNETH, Axel. History and interaction. In: Gregory Elliott (ed.). Althusser: a critical reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. p. 73-91.
HONNETH, Axel. The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflict. Cambridge: Polity, 1995a.
HONNETH, Axel. Domination and moral struggle. The philosophical heritage of Marxism revisited. In: Axel Honneth. The fragmented world of the social: essays in social and political philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995b. p. 3-14.
HONNETH, Axel. Work and instrumental action: on the normative basis of critical theory. In: Axel Honneth. The fragmented world of the social: essays in social and political philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995c. p. 15-49.
HONNETH, Axel. Critical theory. In: Axel Honneth. The fragmented world of the social: essays in social and political philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995d. p. 61-91.
HONNETH, Axel. The fragmented world of symbolic forms: reflections on Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of culture. In: Axel Honneth. The fragmented world of the social: essays in social and political philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995e. p. 184-201.
HONNETH, Axel. Organised self-realisation. Some paradoxes of individualization. European Journal of Social Theory, v. 7, n. 4, p. 463-478, 2004 <10.1177/1368431004046703>.
HONNETH, Axel. Pathologies of the social: the past and present of social philosophy. In: Axel Honneth. Disrespect. The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2007a. p. 3-48.
HONNETH, Axel. The social dynamics of disrespect: on the location of critical theory today. In: Axel Honneth. Disrespect. The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2007b. p. 63-79.
HONNETH, Axel. Moral consciousness and class domination: some problems in the analysis of hidden morality. In: Axel Honneth. Disrespect. The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2007c. p. 80-96.
HONNETH, Axel. Democracy as reflexive cooperation: John Dewey and theory of democracy today. In: Axel Honneth. Disrespect. The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007d. p. 218-239.
HONNETH, Axel. Post-traditional communities: a conceptual proposal. In: Axel Honneth. Disrespect. The normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007e. p. 254-262.
HONNETH, Axel. Reification. A new look at an old idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
HONNETH, Axel. The right of freedom. The social foundations of democratic life. Oxford: Polity, 2014.
HONNETH, Axel. The idea of socialism. A renewal. Oxford: Polity, 2017a.
HONNETH, Axel. Hegel and Marx: a reassessment after one century. In: Banu Bargu; Chiara Bottici (eds.). Feminism, capitalism and critique. New York: Columbia Universty Press, 2017b.
IKÄHEIMO, Heikki. Holism and normative essentialism in Hegel’s social ontology. In: Heikki Ikäheimo; Arto Laitinen (orgs.). Recognition and social ontology. Leiden: Brill, 2011. p. 145-209.
POSTONE, Moishe. Time, labor and social domination: a reinterpretation of Marx’s critical theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
QUANTE, Michael. Recognition as the social grammar of species being in Marx. In: Heikki Ikäheimo; Arto Laitinen (orgs.). Recognition and social ontology. Leiden: Brill, 2011. p. 239-267.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. L’Expérience de l’injustice. Reconnaissance et clinique de l’injustice. Paris: La Découverte, 2004.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. From fordism to post-fordism: beyond or back to alienation? Critical Horizons, v. 8, n. 2, p. 205-220, 2007 <10.1558/crit.v8i2.205>.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. Lire les Manuscrits de 1844. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2008.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. Taking on the inheritance of critical theory. Saving Marx by recognition? In: Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch; Christopher F. Zurn (orgs.). The philosophy of recognition. Historical and philosophical perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2009. p. 241-255.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. Comment Marx se réfère-t-il au travail et à la domination? Actuel Marx. v. 49, n. 1, p. 15-31, 2011 <10.3917/amx.049.0015>.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. Social suffering. Sociology, psychology, politics. London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2017a.
RENAULT, Emmanuel. Reconnaissance, conflit, domination. Paris: CNRS Editions, 2017b.
SCHMIDT AM BUSCH, Hans-Christoph. Can the goals of critical theory be achieved by the theory of recognition? In: Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch; Christopher F. Zurn (orgs.). The philosophy of recognition. Historical and philosophical perspectives. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2009. p. 257-283.
THOMPSON, Michael J. Axel Honneth and the neo-idealist turn in contemporary critical theory. Philosophy and Social Criticism, v. 40, n. 8, p. 779-797, 2014.
THOMPSON, Michael J. The Domestication of Critical Theory. London: Palgrave, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).
