A relação entre metáforas conceptuais e funções executivas: uma revisão da literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2018.s.30400Palabras clave:
Metáforas conceptuais, Funções executivas, Envelhecimento.Resumen
Este artigo de revisão integrativa da literatura busca avaliar as evidências recentes acerca da relação entre o desempenho em tarefas ligadas a funções executivas e a compreensão e a produção de metáforas conceptuais. Para tanto, os descritores “metáforas” e “funções executivas”, bem como termos relacionados a este último, foram pesquisados nas bases de dados Pubmed, Scielo e Lilacs. Após seguir critérios de inclusão e de exclusão, foram selecionados sete artigos que trazem debates recentes acerca do tema. A partir dos experimentos descritos nos estudos revisados, verificou-se que há relação entre desempenho em termos de memória de trabalho e de controle inibitório e a compreensão e a produção de metáforas. Ainda, os fatores idade, tamanho de vocabulário e grau de familiaridade com as metáforas são aspectos que modularam as relações entre funcionamento executivo e a compreensão e/ou produção de metáforas.
Descargas
Citas
BADDELEY, A. D. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 4, n. 11, p. 417-423, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
BADDELEY, A. D.; HITCH, G. J. Working memory. In: G. BOWER (Ed.). Recent advances in learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974. p. 47-90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
BADDELEY, A. D.; HITCH, G. J. Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, v. 8, n. 4, p. 485-493, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.485
BEATY, R.; SILVIA, P. Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory and Cognition, v. 41, n. 2, p. 255-267, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5
BURGESS, P. W. Theory and methodology in executive function research. In: P. Rabbit (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function. East Sussex: Psychology Press Publishers, 1997. p. 81-116.
CHAN, R. C. K.; SHUM, D.; TOULOPOULOU, T.; CHEN, E. Y. H. (2008). Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, v. 23, n. 2, p. 201-216, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010
CHIAPPE, D.; CHIAPPE, P. The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 56, n. 2, p. 172-188, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.006
COLUMBUS, G.; SHEIKH, N. A.; CÔTÉ-LECALDARE, M.; HÄUSER, K. BAUM, S. R.; TITONE, D. Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading. Frontiers in human neuroscience, v. 8, p. 1-12, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057
FEDORENKO, E. The role of domain-general cognitive control in language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 5, p. 1-17, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00335
FUSTER, J. The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe. New York: Raven Press, 1997.
GERNSBACHER, M., KEYSAR, B., ROBERTSON, R., WERNER, N. The role of suppression and enhancement in understanding metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 45, n. 3, p. 433-450, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2782
GIBBS, R. W. Cognitive linguistics and metaphor research: past successes, skeptical questions, future challenges. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 22 (sp.), p. 1-20, 2006.
GIBBS, R. W. Why Cognitive Linguists Should Care More About Empirical Methods. In: GONZALEZ-MARQUEZ, M. et al. (Ed.). Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. Ithaca: John Benjamins, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.06gib
GLUCKSBERG, S.; GILDEA, P.; BOOKIN, H. B. On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, v. 21, n. 1, p. 85-98, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4
GRAFMAN, J. Similarities and distinctions among current models of prefrontal cortical functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, v. 769, n. 1, p. 337-368, 1995.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb38149.x
ISKANDAR, S.; BAIRD, A. D. The Role of Working Memory and Divided Attention in Metaphor Interpretation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 43, n. 4, p. 555–568, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9267-1
JURADO, M. B.; ROSSELI, M. The elusive nature of executive functions: A review of our current understanding. Neuropsychology Review, v. 17, n. 3, p. 213-233, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z
KATZ, A. N.; PAIVIO, A.; MARSCHARK, M.; CLARK, J. M. Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, v. 3, n. 4, p. 191–214, 1988.
KAZMERSKI, V. A.; BLASKO, D. G.; DESSALEGN, B. G. ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, v. 31, n. 5, p. 673-689, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196107
KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor: a practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
LAKOFF, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
LURIA, A. R. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books, 1966.
MASHAL, N. The role of working memory in the comprehension of unfamiliar and familiar metaphors. Language and Cognition, v. 5, n. 4, p. 409-436, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1515/langcog-2013-0024
MORRONE, I.; DECLERCQ, C.; NOVELLA, J. C.; BESCHE, C. Aging and Inhibition Processes: The Case of Metaphor Treatment. Psychology and Aging. v. 25, n. 3, p. 697-670, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019578
MIYAKE, A.; FRIEDMAN, N. P.; EMERSON; M. J.; WITZKI, A. H.; HOWERTER, A.; WAGER, T. D. The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex ‘‘Frontal Lobe’’ Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, v. 41, n. 1, p. 49-100, 2000.
https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
NORMAN, D. A.; SHALLICE, T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. In: DAVIDSON, R. J.; SCHWARTZ, G. E.; SHAPIRO, D. (Eds.). Conscientiousness and self-regulation. New York: Plenum Press, 1986. p. 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1
PARK, D. C.; PAYER, D. Working memory across the adult lifespan. In: BIALYSTOK, E.; CRAIK, F. I. M. (eds.) Lifespan cognition: mechanisms of change. Oxford: Nova York, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169539.003.0009
PASSINGHAM, R. The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
PIERCE, R. S.; MACLAREN, R.; CHIAPPE, D. L. The role of working memory in the metaphor interference effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 17, n. 3, p. 400-404, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.3.400
ROELOFS, A.; PIAI, V. Attention demands of spoken word planning: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 2, p. 1-14, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00307
SALTHOUSE, T. A. What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v. 13, n. 4, p. 140-144, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00293.x
SHAPIRO, K. A.; MOO, L. R.; CARAMAZZA, A. Cortical signatures of noun and verb production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 103, n. 5, p. 1644-1649, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504142103
SMITH, E. E.; JONIDES, J. Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, v. 283, n. 12, p. 1657-1661, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5408.1657
STUART-HAMILTON, I. A psicologia do envelhecimento: uma introdução. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.
STRIJKERS, K.; YUM, Y. N.; GRAINGER, J.; HOLCOMB, P. J. Early goal-directed top down influences in the production of speech. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 2, p. 1-10, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00371
STUSS, D. T.; ALEXANDER, M. P. Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A conceptual view. Psychological Research, v. 63, n. 3-4, p. 289-298, 2000.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004269900007
STUSS, D. T.; BENSON, D. F. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press, 1986.
STUSS, D. T. LEVINE, B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: Lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 53, p. 401-433, 2002.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135220
TONIETTO, L.; WAGNER, G. P.; TRENTINI, C. M.; SPERB, T. M.; PARENTE, M. A. M. P. Interfaces entre funções executivas, linguagem e intencionalidade. Paidéia, v. 21, n. 49, p. 247-255, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2011000200012
VERHAEGHEN, P. Aging and vocabulary scores: a meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, v. 18, v. 2, p. 332-339, 2003.
YE, Z.; ZHOU, X. Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, v. 33, n. 8, p. 1168-1177, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.003
ZELAZO, P.; CRAIK, F.; BOOTH, C. Executive function across the lifespan. Acta Psychologica, v. 115, n. 2-3, 167-183, 2004.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Direitos Autorais
La sumisión de originales para la Letrônica implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Letrônica como el medio de la publicación original.
Licença Creative Commons
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada.
