Argumentation in religious prayers

Abstract

This paper seeks to analyze the argumentation in religious prayers of knowledge made available by the Theory of Semantic Blocks, developed by Ducrot and Carel. Such an argument seems to be precious because of the man's submission to God that appears in the prayers analyzed and can therefore be so well seen from the language itself, from the speaker's own way of referring to the interlocutor, regardless of context. Thus, once again it is proved that the meaning emerges from the words used in certain argumentative threads.