Prosodic Focus and Clefting in ellipsis sentences processing in Brazilian Portuguese

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.1.44425

Keywords:

Sentence Processing, Ellipsis, Prosodic Focus, Clefting.

Abstract

 This research investigates the influence of prosodic focus and sy­tanctic clefting in the processing of ambiguous replacive ellipsis sentences in Brazilian Portuguese, such as “In orchestral rehearsal, (it was) the violinist (who) impressed the maestro during the first song, not the soloist”. Our research was inspired by Carlson (2015) who investigated similar ellipsis sentences in English. We conducted two auditory experiments, manipulating prosody and clefting in 7 conditions. After listening to the audio, participants (N=66) read a question (“What happened in...?”) and they chose an answer: a subject interpretation response (“The soloist impressed nobody”), or an object interpretation response (“Nobody impressed the soloist”). The results indicate that both strategies of focalization (i.e., clefting and prosody) increased subject interpretation choices. When the focus cues were conflicting, the clefting structure played a decisive role in the final interpretation. Our results are aligned with Carlson (2015), which point that prosodic focus plays an important role in the ambiguity resolution (see Schafer et. al, 1996). However, as it was observed by Kiss (1998), the clefting structure conveys an exhaustive contrastive focus on the sentence, being more effective in the disambiguation process than other cues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aline Alves Fonseca, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Letras, MG, Brasil.

Adjunct professor at the Department of Humanities and the Postgraduate Program in Linguistics at the Faculty of Humanities at the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF). PhD in Linguistic Studies from UFMG (2012). Carried out multicenter postdoctoral research at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and Morehead State University, USA (2018/2019). She is a researcher and member of the Center for Studies in Language Acquisition and Psycholinguistics (NEALP/UFJF) and collaborator at the Experimental Psycholinguistics Laboratory (LAPEx/UFRJ).

Andressa Christine Oliveira da Silva, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais, Departamento de Educação, Linguística e Letras, MG, Brasil.

Doctor en Lingüística por la Universidad Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF). Es profesora de inglés en el Departamento de Educación, Lingüística y Literatura de la Universidad Estadual de Minas Gerais (UEMG). Coautor del capítulo “Estudios sobre la interfaz sintaxis-prosodia en Psicolingüística”, publicado en el libro Psicolingüística: diversidades, interfaces y aplicaciones, publicado por Contexto.

Júlia Greco Carvalho, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BR.

Graduated in Literature/Portuguese and Italian from the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF) and a master's student in Linguistics from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), in the line of research “Language, mind and brain”. In 2021, he published together with Aline Fonseca and Samara Zanella the article “Experimental activities in times of pandemic”, in the magazine Texto livre, from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG).

Marcella Campos e Souza, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Faculdade de Letras, MG, Brasil.

Graduated in Letters/Portuguese and respective literatures from the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), in 2023. Currently, she is a master's student in the Postgraduate Program in Linguistics at UFJF, where she is a scholarship holder from the Minas Gerais Research Support Foundation General (FAPEMIG). He is interested in the area of ​​Linguistics, with emphasis on Psycholinguistics and Prosody.

References

ARIEL, Mira. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Lon¬don: Routledge, 1990.

BAAYEN, Rolf Harald; DAVIDSON, Doug; BATES, Dou¬glas. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, [s. l.], v. 59, n. 4, p. 390-412, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

CARLSON, Katy. Clefting, parallelism, and focus in ellipsis sentences. In: FRAZIER, Lyn; GIBSON, Edward (ed.). Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence proces¬sing: studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor. New York: Springer, 2015. p. 63-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12961-7_4

CARLSON, Katy. Parallelism and prosody in the proces¬sing of ellipsis sentences. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2002. (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics).

CARLSON, Katy; TYLER, Joseph. Accents, not just prosodic boundaries, influence syntactic attachment. Language and Speech, [s. l.], v. 61, n. 2, p. 246-276, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917712282

CRAENENBROECK, Jeroen van; TEMMERMAN, Tanja (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.001.0001

FONSECA, Aline Alves. Pesquisa em psicolinguística: explorando o processamento de frases. In: OLIVEIRA, Candido Samuel Fonseca; SÁ, Thaís Maira Machado (org.). Psicolinguística em Minas Gerais. Contagem: CEFET-MG, 2020. p. 95-112.

FONSECA, Aline Alves; CARLSON, Katy; SILVA, An¬dressa. Prosodic effects on attachment in Brazilian Portuguese. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 32., 2019, Boulder. [Poster]. Disponível em: www.colorado.edu/event/cuny2019/sites/default/files/attached-files/a7_fon-seca_etal.pdf. Acesso em: 11 set. 2023.

FORSTER, Kenneth; FORSTER, Jonathan. DMDX: a Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, [s. l.], v. 35, p. 116-124, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503

FRAZIER, Lyn. On comprehending sentences: syntactic parsing strategies. 1979. Thesis (PhD) – University of Connecticut, Storrs, 1979.

FRAZIER, Lyn; FODOR, Janet Dean. The sausage ma¬chine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 4, p. 291-325, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1

GANDÓN-CHAPELA, Evelyn; PÉREZ-GUERRA, Javier. Ellipsis: licensing, structure and identity. The Linguistic Review, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 445-452, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2016-0010

GORDON, Peter; HENDRICK, Randall; JOHNSON, Mar¬cus. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 6, p. 1411-1423, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1411

HOEKS, John; REDEKER, Gisela; HENDRIKS, Petra. Fill the gap! Combining pragmatic and prosodic. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 3, p. 221-235, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9107-5

KISS, Katalin. Identificational focus vs. information focus. Language, [s. l.], v. 74, n. 2, p. 245-273, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211

MERCHANT, Jason. Ellipsis: a survey of analytical appro¬aches. In: CRAENENBROECK, Jeroen van; TEMMERMAN, Tanja (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 19-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.2

NESPOR, Marina; VOGEL, Irene. Prosodic phonology. Foris: Dordrecht, 1986.

PHILIPS, Colin; PARKER, Dan. The psycholinguistics of ellipsis. Lingua, [s. l.], v. 151, p. 78-95, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.003

PSYCHOLOGY SOFTWARE TOOLS. E-Prime 3.0. PST Product Service and Support, [s. l.], 2016. Disponível em: https://support.pstnet.com/. Acesso em: 9 set. 2023.

R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statis¬tical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/. Acesso em: 9 set. 2023.

ROOTH, Mats. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, Amsterdam, v. 1, n. 1, p. 75-116, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617

SCHAFER, Amy et al. Focus in relative clause construal. Language & Cognitive Processes, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 1-2, p. 135-164, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387240

WARREN, Paul. Introducing Psycholinguistics. Cambri¬dge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978531

WARREN, Tessa; GIBSON, Edward. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cog¬nition, [s. l.], v. 85, n. 1, p. 79-112, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00087-2

WINKLER, Susanne. Ellipsis. In: BROWN, Keith (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2. ed. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. p. 109-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02003-4

ZEHR, Jérémy; SCHWARZ, Florian. PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). OSF, [s. l.], 15 mar. 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832. Acesso em: 2 jan. 2021

Downloads

Published

2023-11-21

How to Cite

Alves Fonseca, A., Oliveira da Silva, A. C., Greco Carvalho, J., & Campos e Souza, M. (2023). Prosodic Focus and Clefting in ellipsis sentences processing in Brazilian Portuguese. Letrônica, 16(1), e44425. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.1.44425

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume

Section

PSICOLINGUÍSTICA E NEUROLINGUÍSTICA EM INTERFACES

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Letrônica

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.