Discourse-cognition-society: current state and prospects of the socio-cognitive approach to discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2016.s.23189Keywords:
Critical discourse analysis, Socio-cognitive approach, Mental models, Context models, Knowledge, Attitudes, Ideology.Abstract
This article presents the current state of the art of the socio-cognitive approach in Discourse Studies. The theory relates structures of discourse with social interaction and social structure through a socio-cognitive interface, with the argument that discourse structures and social structures are of a different nature and cannot be related directly. The cognitive theory consists on the one hand, of a personal dimension of personal mental models (i) of the events talked or written about, and (ii) of the communicative situation itself (context models), and on the other hand of a social dimension consisting of socially shared beliefs, knowledge, attitudes and ideologies – which control the personal mental models, and indirectly all discourse. In this way, we are able to explicitly describe how discourses are involved in the reproduction of social problems such as racism or sexism. Moreover, cognitive analysis also describes and explains many aspects of discourse itself, such as all discourse structures based on knowledge (such as local and global semantic coherence, evidentials, etc.), and ideology (such as the polarization of various discourse structures related to Us (ingroup) and Them (outgroup).
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, J. R. Concepts, propositions, and schemata: What are the cognitive units? Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980.
BADDELEY, A. D. Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001. 0001
BADDELEY, A.; CONVAY, M.; AGGLETON, J. (Eds.). Episodic memory. New directions in research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508809.001.000 1
BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 CAP, P.; OKULSKA, U. (Eds.). Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2013.
CLARK, H. H. Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539
COLLINS, A. M.; QUILLIAN, M. R. Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. In: GREGG, L. W. (Ed.). Cognition and learning. New York: Wiley, 1972.
DE FINA, A.; GEORGAKOPOULOU, A. Analyzing Narrative. Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
DURANTI, A.; GOODWIN, C., (Eds.). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
EAGLY, A. H.; CHAIKEN, S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993.
FILLMORE, C. J. The case for case. In: E. BACH, E.; HARMS, R. T. (Eds.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1968. p. 1-88.
GARNHAM, A. Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Chichester, West Sussex, England; New York: E. Horwood Halsted Press, 1987.
GENTNER, D.; STEVENS, A. L. (Eds.). Mental models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1983.
GIVÓN, T. Context as Other Minds. The pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005.
GOLDMAN, A. I. Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/01951 38929.001.0001
GRAESSER, A. C.; GERNSBACHER, M. A.; GOLDMAN, S. R. (Eds.). Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum, 2003.
JASPARS, J.; FRASER, C. Attitudes and social representations. In: FARR, R. M.; MOSCOVICI, S. (Eds.). Social representations. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. 1984. p. 101-123.
JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983.
LAMBRECHT, K. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620607
LEVINSON, S. C. Deixis. Entry in the Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1993.
LUKES, S. Power. A radical view. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
OAKHILL, J.; GARNHAM, A. Interpreting elliptical verb phrases at different times of day: Effects of plausibility and antecedent distance. Language and Speech, 30(2), 145-157, 1987.
PLOTKIN, H. C. Necessary knowledge. Oxford; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568285.001.000 1
PRATKANIS, A. R.; BRECKLER, S. J.; GREENWALD, A. G. (Eds.). Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
ROSCH, E.; LLOYD, B. B. (Eds.). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, N.J.; New York: L. Erlbaum Associates, distributed by Halsted Press, 1978.
ROYCE, T. D.; BOWCHER, W. L. (Eds.). New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2007.
SCHIFFRIN, D.; TANNEN, D.; HAMILTON, H. E. (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2. ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2013.
SEARLE, J. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
SHIPLEY, T. F.; ZACKS, J. M. (Eds.). Understanding events.From perception to action. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780195188370.001.0001
SPERBER, D.; WILSON, D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1995.
STEWART, A. Theories of power and domination. The politics of empowerment in late modernity. London Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE, 2001.
TITSCHER, S.; MEYER, M.; WODAK, R.; VETTER, E. Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Thousand Oaks; Calif.: SAGE, 2000.
TOMASELLO, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
TULVING, E. Elements of episodic memory. Oxford Oxfordshire New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1983.
______. . Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 (1), 1-25, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114
TULVING, E.; CRAIK, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
VAN DIJK, T. A. Prejudice in discourse. An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ pb.v.3
______. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.
______. Racism and the press. London; New York: Routledge, 1991.
______. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1993.
______. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London, England: Sage Publications, 1998.
______. Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity. In: WODAK, Ruth; MEYER, Michael (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. p. 95-120, 2001. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d7
______. Discourse and context. A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008a.
______. Discourse and power. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008b.
______. Society and discourse. How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009a.
______. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in preparation), 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404
______. (Ed.). Discourse Studies. 5 vols. Sage Benchmarks in Discourse Studies. London: Sage, 2007.
______. (Ed.). Racism and Discourse in Latin America. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2009b.
VAN DIJK, T. A.; KINTSCH, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York; Toronto: Academic Press, 1983.
ZWAAN, R. A. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 44, 35-62, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
