O contratualismo e a metáfora da construção em John Rawls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2017.1.19854Palabras clave:
contrato, procedimento, construtivismo, objetividade moral.Resumen
John Rawls se apresenta como um contratualista para questões de ética normativa, ao mesmo tempo em que desenvolve um apelo construtivista em sua teoria. Não obstante, não é clara qual a relação que ele estabelece entre o seu modelo procedimental de justiça e a metáfora da construção normativa. O objetivo central deste artigo é demonstrar em que medida seu o modelo contratualista pode ser interpretado como uma forma de construtivismo procedimental. Para isso, analisaremos contrato e construtivismo separadamente para, posteriormente, identificar os conectivos entre ambos. Com isso, esperamos esclarecer esta relação e responder algumas objeções levantadas a este modelo.Descargas
Citas
AUDARD, Catherine. John Rawls. Oxford: McGill-Quen’s University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653133
BAGNOLI, Carla (ed.). Constructivims in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
BIRD-POLLAN, Stefan. “Rawls: Construction and Justification.” Public Reason. vol. 01, no2, June 2009, pp. 12-30.
BOYD, Richard. “How to Be a Moral Realist” In: SAYRE McCORD, G. (ed.). Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca: Cornell, 1988.
DANIELS, Norman. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511624988
DARWALL, S. (org.). Contractarianism/contractualism. OXOFORD: Blackweel publishing, 2003.
______. “How should ethics relate to philosophy?” In: HORGAN, T.; TIMMONS, M. (eds). Metaethics after Moore. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 17 – 38.
DAVID, Brink. Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
FREEMAN, Samuel (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521651670
FORST, Rainer. Kontext der Gerechtigkeit: Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Komunnitarismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994.
______. Contextos da justiça. (trad. Denilson Luís Werle). São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010.
KORSGAARD, Christine. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554476
______. “Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy.” In: The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 302-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552733.003.0011
McCORMICK, Peter, “Social Contract: Interpretation and Misinterpretation”. In: Canadian Journal of Political Science 9, no 1 (1976), p. 63-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423900043183
MILO, Ronald. “Contractarian Constructivism”. In: The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 92, no 4, April 1995, p. 181-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2940922
O’NEILL, Onora. “Constructivism in Rawls and Kant.” In: FREEMAN, S. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003b, p. 347-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521651670.010
______. Constructions of Reason: Exploration of Kant's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
______. Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
PUTNAM, H. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002.
RAILTON, Peter Railton. “Moral Realism” In: Philosophical Review, XCV, 1986, p. 163-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2185589
______. “Realismo moral”. In: DARWALL, S. Metaética: algumas tendências. Florianópolis: Editora da UFSC, 2013, p. 105-158.
RAWLS, John. A Theory Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.
_______. Collected Papers. Ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.
______. “Fairness to Goodness” (1975). In: Collected Papers. Ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999, p. 267-285.
______. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Ed. Erin Kelly. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.
_______. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Philosophy” (1980). In: Collected Papers. Ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999, p. 303-358.
_______. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
______. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Paperback edition, 1996.
______. “Themes in Kant’s Moral Philosophy” In: Collected Papers. Ed. S. Freeman. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999, p. 497-528.
ROBERTS, Peri. Political Constructivism. New York: Routledge, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461921
SCANLON, Thomas. What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv134vmrn
STREET, Sharon. “Constructivism about Reasons.” In: SHAFER-LANDAU, R. Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2008, p. 207-245.
______. “What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?” Confira: <https://files.nyu.edu/ss194/public/sharonstreet/Writing_files/ Paper%205%20for%20website%20-%20What%20is%20Constructivism%20in%20Ethics%20and%20Metaethics.pdf> Acessado em 25 de janeiro de 2015.
SILVEIRA, Denis C. “Posição original e equilíbrio reflexivo em John Rawls: o problema da justificação.” In: Trans/Form/Ação, São Paulo, Vol. 32, No 1, 2009, p. 139-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732009000100009
STURGEON, Nicholas. “Moral Explanations” In COPP, D.; ZIMMERMAN, D. (eds.) Morality, Reason and Truth. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld, 1985, p. 49-78.
TIMMONS, Mark. Morality without Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
______. “The Limits of Moral Constructivism.” In: Ratio 16, 2003, p. 391-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9329.2003.00230.x
WEBERM, Eric T. Rawls, Dewey, and Constructivism. London: Continuum, 2010.
WERNER, Richard. “Ethical Realism”. In: Ethics, XCIII, 1983, p. 653-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292487
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Revista Veritas implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Revista Veritas como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS