For a feminist theory of justice
Nussbaum’s and Okin’s critique of Rawls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2022.1.41469Keywords:
Autonomy, Feminism, Moral doctrines, Justice, LiberalismAbstract
This article aims to present and develop the feminist critiques of John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, especially through the dialogue and contributions of Martha Nussbaum and Susan Okin to the establishment of a feminist liberalism. In order to do so, we discuss three central points in the debate between these two feminist philosophers and Rawls: a) the notion of the family as an institution of the basic structure of society; b) the distinction between reasonable and unreasonable comprehensive moral doctrines; and c) the conception of political person with full autonomy. Critiques of Rawlsian theory by feminist authors demonstrate Rawls’s importance for contemporary liberalism, while at the same time pointing to the problems that theories that traditionally do not develop a critical eye for the gendered situation of democratic systems find in addressing the situation of women’s citizenship. The demands of liberal feminism, related to the situation of women around the world, are well articulated by Nussbaum from her internal critique of Rawlsian liberalism, emphasizing that some of the Rawls’ theoretical dispositions (especially in relation to the issue of how Rawls’ regards the institution of the family) do not appear to be radical enough to ensure the full availability of these capabilities for women and children. Similarly, Nussbaum’s dialogue with Okin’s critiques deepened the debate over the limits of Rawls’s theory of justice.
Downloads
References
ABBEY, Ruth. The Return of Liberal Feminism. New York: Routledge, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315730110
BENHABIB, Seyla; CORNELL, Drucilla. Feminism as critique: On the politics of gender. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, 1987.
GEERTZ, Clifford. Anti anti-relativismo. In: Nova luz sobre a antropologia. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2001. p. 47-67.
HIRSHMAN, Linda R. Is the original position inherently male-superior? Columbia Law Review, v. 94, p. 1860- 1881, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1123183
JAMIESON, Beth K. Real choices: feminism, freedom, and the limits of law. The Pennsylvania State University Press: Pennsylvania, 2001.
KANT, Immanuel. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1960.
MACKINNON, Catharine. Towards a feminist theory of State. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1991a.
MACKINNON, Catharine. From Practice to Theory, or What is a White Woman Anyway? Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, [S. I.], v. 4, n. 1, Article 3, 1991b.
MIKKOLA, Mari. Kant on moral agency and women’s nature. Kantian review, [S. I.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 89-111, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415410000014
MILL, John Stuart. Sobre a Liberdade e A Sujeição das Mulheres. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2017.
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Human Capabilities, Female Human Beings. In: NUSSBAUM, Martha; GLOVER, Jonathan. Women, Culture, and Development: a study of human capabilities. Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1996.
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Rawls and Feminism. In: FREEMAN, Samuel (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521651670.015
NUSSBAUM, Martha. Rawls’s Political Liberalism. A Reassessment. Ratio Juris, [S. I.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-24, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00471.x
NUSSBAUM, Martha e GLOVER, Jonathan. Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198289642.001.0001
OKIN, Susan. ‘Forty acres and a mule’ for women: Rawls and Feminism. SAGE: Politics, philosophy & economics, [S. I.], v. 4, n. 2, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05052540
OKIN, Susan. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840991-002
PATEMAN, Carole. The disorder of women: women, love, and the sense of justice. Ethics, [S. I.], v. 91, n. 1, p. 20-34, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292200
RAWLS, John. O Liberalismo Político. 2. ed. Editora Ática, São Paulo, 2000.
RAWLS, John. Uma Teoria da Justiça. Martins Fontes, São Paulo, 2000.
SEN, Amartya. A ideia de justiça. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Veritas (Porto Alegre)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p
