Kant and Rawls: an analysis of the moral assumptions of political liberalism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34658

Keywords:

Ethics. Morals. Politics. Practical reason.

Abstract

In the light of conceptual reformulations about the philosophical assumptions accepted by Rawls in the development of his theory of justice, the present article aims to question the idea of freestanding of the political scope, as discussed in Political Liberalism (1993), evidencing some moral assumptions not explained by the author. From a semantic agreement proposed by Rainer Forst, which differentiates the scopes of application of ethics, politics, and morals, the attempt of this discussion is to demonstrate that there is a moral foundation in political liberalism, which, however, should not be understood in an ethical sense. The proposition is that this moral presupposition lies in Kantian practical reason, for it is from this that Rawls starts to structure and ground his conception of justice. Hence, the principles of Rawlsian political liberalism, in order to be effective when applied to the basic structure of society, must be analyzed through the moral elements of Kantian practical reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Douglas João Orben, Faculdade Palotina, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

Doutor em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) e professor do curso de Filosofia da Faculdade Palotina (FAPAS), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

References

DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os direitos a sério. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.

ESTLUND, David. The insularity of the reasonable: why political liberalism should admit the truth. Ethics, v. 108, n. 2, p. 252-275, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/233804

FORST, Rainer. Kontext der Gerechtigkeit: Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und Komunnitarismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994.

FORST, Rainer. Contextos da justiça. Tradução Denilson Luís Werle. São Paulo:Boitempo, 2010.

FREEMAN, Samuel (Org.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521651670

FREEMAN, Samuel. Rawls: Routledge Philosophers. Londres: Routledge, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086605

HAMPTON, Jean. Political philosophy. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996.

HEGEL, G. Principios de la filosofia del derecho o derecho natural y ciencias políticas. Tradução de Juan Luis Vermal. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 1975.

KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura. 5. ed. Trad. Manuela Pinto dos Santos e Alexandre Fradique Morujão. Lisboa: Editora Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2001.

KANT , Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Prática. 3. ed. Tradução Valério Rohden. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011.

KANT , Immanuel. Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes. Tradução Paulo Quintela. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2007.

KANT , Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Erlagen: Fischer, 1984.

KERSTING, Wolfng. John Rawls zur Einführung. 2ª. Ed. Hamburg: Junius Verlag, 2004.

KERSTING, Wolfng. Spannungsvolle Rationalitätsbegriffe in der politischen Philosophie von John Rawls. In: APEL, K. O.; KETTNER, M. (org.). Die eine Vernunft und die vielen Rationalitäten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1996. p. 227-265.

LARMORE, Charles. The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816611

MAHONEY, Jon. Public reason and the moral foundation of political liberalism. In: BROOKS, T.; FREYENHAGEN, F. (Eds.) The legacy of John Rawls. New York: Continuum Books, 2007. p. 85-106.

O’NEIL, Onora. Constructions of reason: explorations of Kant’s practical philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173773

O’NEIL, Onora. Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. In: FREEMAN, S. (org.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 347-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521651670.010

PATON, H. The Categorical Imperative: A study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson’s University Library, 1947.

RAWLS, John. A Theory Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

RAWL S, John. História da filosofia moral. Tradução Ana Aguiar Cotrim. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

RAWL S, John. Justiça e Democracia. Tradução Irene A. Paternot. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.

RAWLS, John. Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory. In: FREEMAN, S.(org.). Collected Papers. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard UniversityPress, 1999. p. 303-358.

RAWL S, John. Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. 2. ed. Cambridge (Massachusetts): Harvard University Press, 2003.

RAWL S, John. O liberalismo político. Tradução Álvaro de Vita. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2011.

RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Paperback edition, 1996.

RAWL S, John. Uma teoria da justiça. Tradução A. Pisetta e L. M. R. Esteves. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.

WEBER, Thadeu. Fundamentação moral do liberalismo político de Rawls. In. Ethic@ - Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil, v. 15, n. 3, p. 398 – 417. Dez. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2016v15n3p398

WENAR, Leif. Political liberalism: an internal critique. In: Ethics, v. 106, p. 32-62, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/293777

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Orben, D. J. (2019). Kant and Rawls: an analysis of the moral assumptions of political liberalism. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 64(3), e34658. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34658

Issue

Section

Philosophy & Interdisciplinarity