Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.40497Keywords:
cesarean section, labor obstetric, parturition delivery, obstetric natural childbirthAbstract
Aims: the goal was to identify the most prevalent indications of cesarean section in pregnant women classified as Robson 1, comparing motherly variables, obstetric background and perinatal outcomes.
Methods: cross-sectional analytical study, evaluating the electronic medical records of birthing women classified as Robson 1. The quantitative variables were compared using Student’s T Test or Mann Whitney, the qualitative ones were applied to the Chi-square Test or Fisher’s Exact.
Results: of the 2267 eligible women in the study 570 (25,1%) had C-section. The most prevalent indications of C-section were fetal distress numbering 213 (37,4%) of the reports and cephalopelvic disproportion reaching as high as 212 (37,2%) cases. The relevant variables to the outcome were: age (odds ratio 1,0), gestational age (1,4), Pregestational Body Mass Index (1,6 in overweight and 1,8 seen in obesity) and hypertensive syndrome (3,6).
Conclusion: some pregnant and obstetric characteristics directly affect the indication of C-sections.
Downloads
References
Organização Mundial de Saúde. Declaração da OMS sobre Taxas de Cesáreas: Os esforços devem se concentrar em garantir que cesáreas sejam feitas nos casos em que são necessárias, em vez de buscar atingir uma taxa específica de cesáreas. Human Reproduction Programme [Internet]. 2015 Oct 08 [cited 2021 Aug 11]:1-8. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/pt
Velho MB, Santos EKA, Colaço VS. Parto normal e cesárea: representações sociais de mulheres que os vivenciaram. Rev. Bras. Enfer. 2014;67(2):282-9. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7167.20140038
Torres JA, Domingues RMSM, Sandall J, Hartz Z, Gama SGN, Filha MMT, et al. Cesariana e resultados neonatais em hospitais privados no Brasil: estudo comparativo de dois diferentes modelos de atenção perinatal. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2014;30:220-31. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00129813
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Datasus [Internet]. Brasília, DF; 2009 Jan 01. Proporção partos cesáreos por Capital segundo Região e Unidade da Federação; [cited 2020 May 1]. Available from: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?idb2010/f08.def
Nakano AR, Bonan C, Teixeira LA. O trabalho de parto do obstetra: estilo de pensamento e normalização do “parto cesáreo” entre obstetras. Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva. 2017;27(3):415-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312017000300003
Bolognani CV, Reis LBSM, Dias A, Calderon IMP. Robson 10-groups classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of the Federal District/Brazil. Plos One. 2018;13(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192997
Hehir MP, Ananth CV, Siddiq Z, Flood K, Friedman AM, D’Alton ME. Cesarean delivery in the United States 2005 through 2014: a population-based analysis using the Robson 10-Group Classification System. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(1):105 e1-e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.012
Kuhn MC. Classification and Regression Trainning 2016; 2016 [cited 2020 Fev 09]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/index.html
Oliveira AR. Fatores associados e indicações para a prática de cesariana: um estudo caso-controlo. RPMGF. 2013;29:151-9. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i3.11067
Silva AP, Romero RT, Bragantine A, Barbieri AADM, Lago MTG. As indicações de cesáreas no Brasil: uma revisão de literatura integrativa. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde [Internet]. 2019 Jun 01 [cited 2021 aug 11];24(624):1-9. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e624.2019
Oliveira RR, Melo EC, Novaes ES, Ferracioli PLRV, Mathias TAF. Factors associated to Caesarean delivery in public and private health care systems. Rev. esc. enferm. USP. 2016;50(5):733-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000600004
Ribeiro FAC, Xavier IM, Barreto LM, Furtado MCM, Oliveira MBB, Batista TS. Vias de parto e suas repercussões neonatais [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso on the Internet]. [Anápolis, GO]: Centro Universitário de Anápolis - Unievangélica; 2017 [cited 2021 aug 11]. 31 p. Available from: http://repositorio.aee.edu.br/jspui/handle/aee/609 Superior, Medicina
Macedo AMB, Goes HF, Melo WA. Caracterização e análise dos partos ocorridos no município de Maringá - PR de 2000 a 2009; 2012 [Internet]. Maringá, PR: Cesumar; 2012 [cited 2021 aug 11]. Available from: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=-cache:kaP28FHTGQcJ:www.cesumar.br/prppge/pesquisa/mostras/vi_mostra/ana_maria_bufolo_macedo.pdf+&cd=1&hl=pt-BR&ct=clnk&gl=br
Knupp VMAO, Melo ECP, Oliveira RB. Distribuição do parto vaginal e da cesariana no município do Rio de Janeiro no período de 2001 a 2004. Esc. Anna Nery. 2008;12(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-81452008000100006
Benute GRG, Nomura RY, Santos AM, Zarvos MA, Lucia MCS, Francisco RPV. Preferência pela via de parto: uma comparação entre gestantes nulíparas e primíparas. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35(6):281-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032013000600008
Silva A P, Romero R T, Bragantine A, Barbieri AADM, Lago MTG. As indicações de cesáreas no Brasil: uma revisão de literatura integrativa. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde. 2019;24(624):1-9. https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e624.2019
Inagaki ADM, Silva JC, Santos MS, Santos LV, Abud ACF, Cruz VC. Cesárea: prevalência, indicações e desfecho do recém-nascido. Rev. Enferm. UFPE on-line. 2014;8(12):4278-84. https://doi.org/10.5205/reuol.6825-58796-1-SM.0812201412
Nascimento LFC, Gotlieb SLD. Fatores de risco para o baixo peso ao nascer, com base em informações da Declaração de Nascido Vivo em Guaratinguetá, SP, no ano de 1998. Inf. Epidemiol. SUS. 2001;10(3):113-20. https://doi.org/10.5123/S0104-16732001000300002
Cardoso PO, Alberti LR, Petroianu A. Morbidade neonatal e maternas relacionada ao tipo de parto. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva [Internet]. 2008;15(2):427-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232010000200019
Mascarello K C, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev. Saúde Pública [Internet]. 2017;51(105):1-12. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000389
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Medica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Scientia Medica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Scientia Medica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
