Factors associated to mammography exam according to two criteria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.38014Keywords:
public health, mammography, mass screening, women’s health, breast neoplasms, secondary preventionAbstract
Aims: we aimed to compare the prevalence and factors associated to mammography exam according to two Brazilian criteria.
Methods: a cross-sectional, population-based study, with women between 40 and 74 years old from Rio Grande, RS, Brazil. The coverage of mammography was evaluated: 1) annual screening for women aged 40 to 74 years old; 2) biennial screening for women aged 50 to 69 years old. Data analyses were performed by Poisson regression.
Results: it was included 413 (criterion 1) and 246 (criterion 2) women. The mammography coverage by criterion 1 was 49.4% (95%CI 43.8 to 55.0), ranging from a quarter for those who did not visit a doctor in the last year to two thirds for those with higher education level. Considering the criterion 2, the coverage was 65.5% (CI95% 59.2 to 71.7), ranging from one-third among those who did not visit a doctor in the last year to three-quarters among obese women.
Conclusions: the mammography coverage differed according to the criterion considered. Higher socioeconomic status and having visiting a doctor in the last year were the most associated factors, regardless of the criterion.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization. Early diagnosis and screening: Breast Cancer [Online]. 2019 [acesso em 10 mai 2019]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/breast-cancer/en/
Brasil. A mulher e o câncer de mama no Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Coordenação Geral de Prevenção e Vigilância, Divisão de Detecção Precoce e Apoio à Organização de Rede – 3. ed. rev. atual. Rio de Janeiro: INCA. 2018 [acesso em 7 mai 2019]. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/sites/ufu.sti.inca.local/files//media/document//catalogo-expo-mama-3a-ed-2018.pdf
Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, Chiu SY, Chen SL, Fann JC, Rosell J, Fohlin H, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Swedish Two-County Trial: Impact of Mammographic Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011; 260:3. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110469
Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1778-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61611-0
Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013; 6. CD001877. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub5
Brasil. Diretrizes para a detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva – Rio de Janeiro: INCA. 2015 [acesso em 12 jun 2019]. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/controle-do-cancer-de-mama/acoes-de-controle/deteccao-precoce
Urban LABD, Chala LF, Bauab SP, Schaefer MB, Santos RP, Maranhã NMA, Kefalas AL, Kalaf JM, Ferreira CAP, Canella EO, Peixoto JE, Amorim HLE, Junior HBAC. Recomendações do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, da Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia e da Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia para o rastreamento do câncer de mama. Radio Bras. 2017; 50(4): 244-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2017-0069
Dumith SC, Paulitsch RG, Carpena MX, Muraro MFR, Simões MO, Machado KP, Dias MS, Kretschmer AC, Oliz MM, Pontes LS, Susin LRO. Planejamento e execução de um inquérito populacional de saúde por meio de consórcio de pesquisa multidisciplinar. Sci Med. 2018; 28(3): ID30407. http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2018.3.30407
Oliz MM, Dumith SC, Knuth AG. Utilização de serviços de educação física por adultos e idosos no extremo sul do Brasil: Estudo de base populacional. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva. 2020; 25(2): 541-52 https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.14692018.
Loy EY, Molinar D, Chow KY, Fock C. National Breast Cancer Screening Programme, Singapure: Evaluation of participation and performance indicators. J Med. Screen. 2015; 22(4): 194-00. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141315589644
Szwarcwald CL, Leal MC, Gouveia GC, Souza WV. Desigualdades socioeconômicas em saúde no Brasil: resultados da Pesquisa Mundial de Saúde, 2003. Rev. Bras. Saúde Matern. Infant. 2005; 5(1): S11-S22.
Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Brawley OW, Wender RC. Cancer Screening in the United States, 2018: A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Current Issues in Cancer Screening. Ca Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68: 297-16. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21446
The European Union. Cancer Screening in the European Union (2017): Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening. 2017 [acesso em 10 mai 2019]. Disponível em: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/major_chronic_diseases/docs/2017_cancerscreening_2ndreportimplementation_en.pdf
Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ. 2009; 338. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2025
American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2015-2016. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2015.
Freitas JA, Oliveira BGP, Ferreira HH, Espírito Santo SR, Santos RH. Análise do índice de cobertura da mamografia em mulheres entre 50 e 69 anos, por nível de ensino, segundo unidade de federação. Rev. Med UFC. 2016; 56(1): 14-7. https://doi.org/10.20513/2447-6595.2016v56n1p14-17
Freitas-Junior R, Rodrigues DCN, Corrêa RS, Peixoto JE, Oliveira HVCG, Rahal RMS. Contribuição do Sistema Único de Saúde no rastreamento mamográfico no Brasil, 2013. Radio Bras. 2016; 49(5): 305-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2014.0129
Lima-costa MF, Matos DL. Prevalência e fatores associados à realização da mamografia na faixa etária de 50-69 anos: um estudo baseado na Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (2003). Cad. Saúde Pública. 2007; 23(7): 1665-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2007000700018
Oliveira EXG, Pinheiro RS, Melo ECP, Carvalho MS. Condicionantes socioeconômicos e geográficos do acesso à mamografia no Brasil, 2003-2008. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2011; 16(9): 3649-64. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011001000002
São Paulo. Instituto de Saúde. Acesso aos serviços de saúde em Municípios da Baixada Santista [Online]. 2008 [acesso 18 jul. 2019]. Disponível em: http://www.saude.sp.gov.br/resources/instituto-de-saude/homepage/temas-saude-coletiva/pdfs/temas08.pdf
Silva GA, Bustamante-Teixeira MT, Aquino EML, Tomazelli JG, dos-Santos-Silva I. Acesso à detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma análise a partir dos dados do Sistema de Informações em Saúde. Cad. Saúde Pùblica. 2014; 30(7): 1537-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00156513
Sanford NN, Sher DJ, Butler S, Xu X, Ahn C, D’Amico AV, Rebbeck T, Aizer AA, Mahal BA. Cancer Screening Patterns Among Current, Former, and Never Smokers in the Unite States, 2010-2015. JAMA Network Open. 2019; 2(5): e193759. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3759
Borges MTT, Barbosa RHS. As marcas de gênero no fumar feminino: uma aproximação sociológica do tabagismo em mulheres. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2009; 14(4): 1129-39. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232009000400019.
Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Obesity and Breast Cancer Screening: The influence of Race, Illness Burden, and Other Factors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19: 324–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30354.x
Shafaee MN, Gerberding A. Rising Obesity and Breast Cancer Screening. JOJ Pub Health. 2018; 3(4): JOJPH.MS.ID.555616. https://dx.doi.org/10.19080/JOJPH.2018.03.555616
Elmore JG, Carney PA, Abraham LA, Barlow WE, Egger JR, Fosse JS, Cutter GR, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ, Paliwal P, Taplin SH. The Association Between Obesity and Screening Mammography Accuracy. Arch intern med. 2004; 164(10): 1140-7 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.164.10.1140
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Medica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Scientia Medica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Scientia Medica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
