Main allergens in elderly and non-elderly patients with contact dermatitis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2016.4.24281Keywords:
dermatitis, contact, elderly, fragrances, nickel, patch tests.Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the prevalence of the main allergens found in allergic contact dermatitis among elderly and non-elderly patients.
Methods: Retrospective study of the medical records of patients clinically diagnosed with contact dermatitis treated from August 2000 to January 2012 at the Allergy Outpatient Clinic of Marília Medical School and at an Allergy and Dermatology private clinic in Marília, state of São Paulo, Brazil. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis, patch test performed during the study period, and no treatment with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressants. Age, sex, history of other types of allergy and allergens used were assessed. The patch test results were read 48 hours and 72 hours after application of the test chambers.
Results: A total of 362 patients were included in the study: 60 elderly patients (aged 60 years or older) and 302 non-elderly patients. In addition to contact dermatitis, other types of allergies were observed in 20 (33.3%) of elderly patients and in 113 (37.4%) of non-elderly patients (p=0.54). There were 162 positive reactions on the patch test among elderly patients and 738 positive reactions among non-elderly patients (p=0.24). Strong positive reactions were present in 41 (68.3%) elderly patients and in 156 (51.6%) non-elderly patients (p=0.02). Strong and very strong positive reactions, when assessed together, were detected in 44 (73.3%) elderly patients and in 214 (70.8%) non-elderly patients (p=0.69). The most common allergens were nickel sulfate (in 33.3% of elderly and 38% of non-elderly patients) and fragrance mix (in 25% of elderly and 27.8% of non-elderly patients), with no statistical difference between the groups.
Conclusions: There was a high rate of positive reactions on the patch test among patients with contact dermatitis, with no difference between elderly and non-elderly individuals, and the most common allergens were nickel sulfate and fragrance mix. Therefore, it is important that allergy to nickel and fragrances be included in the etiologic investigation of contact dermatitis, regardless of age.Downloads
References
Bourke J, Coulson I, English J. Guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis: an update. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160:946–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09106.x
Motta AA, Aun MV, Kalil J, Giavina-Bianchi P. Dermatite de contato. Rev Bras Alerg Imunopatol.2011;34(3):73-82.
Fonacier LS, Dreskin SC, Leung DYM. Allergic skin disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S138-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.039
Martins LEAM, Reis VMS. Imunopatologia da dermatite de contato alérgica. An Bras Dermatol. 2011;86(3):419-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962011000300001
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, Cannavó A, Giménez-Arnau A, Gonçalo M, Goossens A, John SM, Lidén C, Lindberg M, Mahler V, Matura M, Rustemeyer T, Serup J, Spiewak R, Thyssen JP, Vigan M, White IR, Wilkinson M, Uter W. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Oct;73(4):195-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.12432
Duarte I, Lazzarini R, Buense R, Pires MC. Dermatite de contato. An Bras Dermatol. 2000;75(5):529-48.
Deleo VA, Taylor SC, Belsito DV, Fowler JF Jr, Fransway AF, Maibach HI, Marks JG Jr, Mathias CG, Nethercott JR, Pratt MD, Reitschel RR, Sherertz EF, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS. The effect of race and ethnicity on patch test results. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Feb;46(2 Suppl Understanding):S107-12.
Prakash AV, Davis MDP. Contact dermatites in older adults – a review of literature. Am J Clin Dermatol.2010;11(6):373-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11319290-000000000-00000
Seyfarth F, Schliemann S, Antonov D, Elsner P. Dry skin barrier function and irritant contact dermatites in the elderly. Clin Dermatol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):31-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.07.004
Grupo Brasileiro de Estudo em Dermatite de Contato; Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Departamento Especializado de Alergia. Estudo multicêntrico para elaboração de uma bateria-padrão brasileira de teste de contato. An Bras Dermatol. 2000;75(2):147-56.
Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Fowler JF Jr, Maibach HI, Belsito DL, Pratt MD, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS, Mathias CG, Deleo VA, Rietschel RL, Marks J. Patch-testresults of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006. Dermatitis. 2009 May-Jun;20(3):149-60.
Fransway AF, Zug KA, Belsito DV, Deleo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Maibach HI, Marks JG, Mathias CG, Pratt MD, Rietschel RL, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ, Taylor JS, Warshaw EM, Dekoven J, Zirwas M. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008. Dermatitis. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):10-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0b013e318277ca50
Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, DeKoven JG, Zirwas MJ, Fransway AF, Mathias CG, Zug KA, DeLeo VA, Fowler JF Jr, Marks JG, Pratt MD, Storrs FJ, Maibach HI. Dermatitis. 2013 Mar-Apr;24(2):50-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DER.0b013e3182819c51
Rodrigues DF, Neves DR, Pinto JM, Alves MFF, Fulgêncio ACF. Results of patch-tests from Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte Dermatology Clinic, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, from 2003 to 2010. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87(5):800-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962012000500028
Minelli L, Swenson AM. Estudo de 70 casos de eczema de contato: alérgenos observados. Rev Bras Alerg Imunopatol.1997;20(5):173-8.
Bendkowski B. Allergic diseases in the elderly. Gen Practit. 1968;16:208-14
Wöhrl S, Stingl G. Underestimation of allergies in elderly patients. Lancet. 2004;363:249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15349-4
Becerril AM, Vázquez MCL, Angeles GU, Alvarado MLE, Vilchis GE. Prevalencia de enfermidades alérgicas em adultos mayores. Ver Alerg Mex. 2008;55(3):85-91.
Ventura MT, D'Amato A, Giannini M, Carretta A, Tummolo RA, Buquicchio R. Incidence of allergic diseases in na elderly population. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2010;32(1):165-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08923970903213735
Cardona V, Guilarte M, Luengo O, Labrador-Horrillo M, Sala-Cunill A, Garriga T. Allergic diseases in the elderly. Clin Transl Allergy. 2011;1(1):e11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-1-11
Alves LDS, Calamita ABP, Calamita Z. Estudo comparativo da prevalência de alergias entre idosos e não idosos. Braz J Allergy Immunol. 2014:2(2):75-80.
Alves LDS, Calamita Z. Sintomas de alergia em idosos atendidos em um ambulatório de geriatria. Sci Med. 2014;24(3):269-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2014.3.16326
Balato A, Balato N, Di Constanzo L, Ayala F. Contact sensitization in the elderly. Clin Dermatol. 2011;29:24-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.07.003
Accursio CSC. Alterações da pele na Terceira idade. Rev Bras Med. 2001;58(9):646-58.
Warshaw EM, Raju SI, Fowler JF Jr, Maibach HI, Belsito DV, Zug KA, Rietschel RL, Taylor JS, Mathias CG, Fransway AF, DeLeo VA, Marks JG Jr, Storrs FJ, Pratt MD, Sasseville D; North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2008. Positive patch test reactions in older individuals: retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2008. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Feb;66(2):229-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.022
Ali SA. Testes epicutâneos, testes de contato ou "patch tests" porque usar e como usar. Rev Bras Alerg Imunopatol. 1993;16(5):192-7.
Duarte I, Kobata C, Lazzarini R. Dermatite de contato em idosos. An Bras Dermatol. 2007;82(2):135-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962007000200004
Önder M, Öztas MO. Contact dermatitis in the elderly. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;48(4):232-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00060.x
Tosti A, Pazzaglia M, Silvani S, Delorenzi F. The espectrum of allergic contact dermatites in the elderly. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50(6):379-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.0350g.x
Torres F, Graças M, Melo M, Tosti A. Management of contact dermatitis due to nickel allergy: an update. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2009;2:39-48.
Kim YY, Kim MY, Park YM, Kim HO, Koh CS, Lee HK. Evaluating the nickel content in metal alloys and the threshold for nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23:315-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2008.23.2.315
Duarte I, Amorim JR, Perázzio EF, Schmitz Junior R. Metal contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to nickel, cobalt and chromium. An Bras Dermatol. 2005;80(2):137-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962005000200003
Shum KW, Meyer JD, Chen Y, Cherry N, Gawkrodger DJ. Occupational contact dermatitis to nickel: experience of the British dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) surveillance schemes. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:954-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.60.12.954
Scheinman PL. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review. Am J Contact Dermat. 1996;7(2):65-76.
Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O. Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:392-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.6.392
Larsen W, Nakayama H, Fischer T, Elsner P, Frosch P, Burrows D, Jordan W, Shaw S, Wilkinson J, Marks J, Sugawara M, Nethercott M, Nethercott J. Fragrance contact dermatitis – a worldwide multicenter investigation (part III). Contact Dermatitis. 2002;46(3):141-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0536.2002.460302.x
Guin JD, Berry VK. Perfume sensitivity in adult females: a study of contact sensitivity to a perfume mix in two groups of student nurses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1980;3:299-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(80)80193-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Scientia Medica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Scientia Medica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
