Online Campaigning and Twitter: communicative interaction between campaigns and voters in 2010 Brazilian presidential election

Authors

  • Camilo de Oliveira Aggio POSCOM/UFBA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2016.1.22088

Keywords:

Online Campaigning, Election, Twitter

Abstract

Since 1996, researchers from around the world discusses, theoretically and empirically, about which democratic and strategic benefits derives from online direct communication between candidates, political parties and voters as well as how often and with what purpose direct communication is adopted. Specifically, this paper aims at evaluate the frequency of interactive features adoption by the three main candidates running for president of Brazil in 2010 on twitter using a methodological approach to distinguish real interactions between campaigns and voters from messages that contains interactive features but are not translated in real discursive exchanges. I conclude that the three main candidates interacted in significant levels. Notwithstanding, the direct interactions between the three main campaigns and Twitter users were not used to discuss ideas, plans and positions on political issues.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Camilo de Oliveira Aggio, POSCOM/UFBA

Doutor em Comunicação e Política e professor permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Coontemporâneas/UFBA. Especialista em campanhas online

References

AGGIO, Camilo. Campanhas on-line: o percurso da formação das questões, problemas e configurações a partir da literatura produzida entre 1992 e 2009. In: MARQUES, F. P. J. A.; SAMPAIO, R. C ; AGGIO, Camilo (Org.). Do clique à urna: Internet, redes sociais e eleições no Brasil. 1. ed. Salvador: EDUFBA, v.1, p. 290-350, 2013.

ARAGÓN, Pablo; KAPPLER, Karolin Eva; KALTENBRUNNER, Andreas; LANIADO, David; VOLKOVICH, Yana. Communication Dynamics in Twitter During Political Campaigns: The Case of the 2011 Spanish National Election. Policy and Internet. v.5, n.2, p. 183-206, 2013.

BAXTER, Graeme; MARCELLA, Rita. Online Parliamentary Election Campaigns in Scotland: A decade of Research. E-Journal of eDemocracy and Open Government, v.5, n.2, p. 107-127, 2012.

BRUNS, Axel; HIGHFIELD, Tim. Political Networks on Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, v.5, n.16, p. 667-691, 2013.

BURSON-MARSTELLER. Twiplomacy. Disponível em: http://brasil.bm.com/releases/twitter-e-a-rede-social-favorita-dos-lideres-do-governo/. Acesso em: 08 out. 2015.

CARLSON, Tom; GÖRAN, Djupsund. Old Wine in New Bottles? The 1999 Finnish Election Campaign on the Internet. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics; v.6, n.1, p. 68-87, 2001.

CONWAY, Bethany Anne; KENSKI, Kate; WANG, Di. Twitter Use by Presidential Primary Candidates During the 2012 Campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, v.57, n.11, p. 1596-1610, 2013.

DAVIS, Richard; OWEN, Diana. New Media and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

DRUCKMAN, James N.; KIFER, Martin J; PARKIN, Michael. The Technological Development of Congressional Candidate Websites: How and Why Candidates Use Web Innovations. Social Science Computer Review; v.25, n.4, p. 425-442, 2007.

ENLI, Gunn Sara; SKOGERBO, Eli. Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics. Information, Communication & Society, v.16, p. 5, p. 1-18, 2013.

FARNSWORTH, Stephen J.; OWEN, Diana. Internet use and the 2000 presidential election. Electoral Studies, v.23, n.3, p. 415-429, 2004.

FERNANDEZ, Rogério Garcia. Campanhas Eleitorais Brasileiras na Internet. Dissertação.2005. 145 f. (Mestrado em Ciência Política do Instituto de Filosofia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas) – Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, UNICAMP, Campinas, 2005.

GIBSON, Rachel K.; MARGOLIS; RESNICK, Michael; WARD, Stephen J. Election campaigning on the www in the USA and UK: A Comparative Analysis. Party Politics, v.9, n.1, p. 47-75, 2003.

GOMES, W. S.; FERNANDES, Breno; REIS, Lucas; SILVA, Tarcizio. "Politics 2.0": A campanha on-line de Barack Obama em 2008. In:

MARQUES, F. P. J. A.; SAMPAIO, Rafael C.; AGGIO, Camilo (Org.). Do clique à urna: Internet, redes sociais e eleições no Brasil. Salvador: EDUFBA, p. 63-90, 2013.

GOMES, W.; REIS, Lucas; DUARTE, Marília; MARQUES, Maurício. O Twitter na campanha eleitoral de 2010. Anais do IV Congresso da Compolítica. Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, 2010.

GRAHAM, Todd; BROERSMA, Marcel; HAZELHOFF, Karin; van’t Haar,

GUIDO. Between Broadcasting Political Message and Interacting with Voters. Information, Communication & Society, v.16, n.5, p. 692-716, 2013.

GRUSELL, Marie; NORD, Lars. Three Attitudes to 140 Characters: The Use and Views of Twitter in Political Party Communications in Sweden. Public Communication Review. v.2, n.2, p. 48-61, 2012.

HOLOTESCU, Carmen; GROSSECK, Gabriela; BRAN, Ramona; GUTU, Dorina. The Influence of Communication in 140 Characters on Romanian Presidential Elections. Disponível em: http://www.ris.uvt.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/holotescuetal_ris13.pdf. Acesso em: 8 out. 2015.

HOWARD, Philip N. Deep Democracy, Thin Citizenship: The Impact of Digital Media in Political Campaign Strategy. In: Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597, 2005.

KLINGER, Ulrike. Mastering the Art of Social Media: Swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges. Information, Communication & Society. v.16, n.5, p. 717-736, 2013.

KLUVER, Randolph. Political Culture and Information Technology in the 2001 Singapore General Election. Political Communication, v.21, n.4, p. 435-458, 2004.

LUSOLI, Wainer; WARD, Janelle. "Politics Makes Strange Bedfellows": The Internet and the 2004 European Parliament Election in Britain. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics; v.10 n.4, p. 71-97, 2005.

MACNAMARA, Jim; KENNING, Gail. E-electioneering 2010: Trends in social media use in Australian political communication. Disponível em: https://www.academia.edu/830297/E-electioneering_2010_Trends_in_Social_Media_Use_in_Australian_Political_Communication. Acesso em: 1 maio 2014.

MARQUES, F. P. J. A.; AQUINO, J. A. Representação Parlamentar no Twitter: Uma abordagem quantitativa. Anais do XXII Encontro Anual da Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação (COMPÓS), Salvador: UFBA, 2013.

MARQUES, F. P. J. A. ; SILVA, F.W.O.; MATOS, N.R. . Estratégias de Comunicação Política Online: Uma Análise do Perfil de José Serra no Twitter. In: Francisco Paulo Jamil Almeida Marques, Rafael Cardoso Sampaio e Camilo Aggio. (Org.). Do clique à urna: internet, redes sociais e eleições no Brasil. 1ed.Salvador: EDUFBA, 2013, v. 1, p. 268-302.

PARK, Hun Myoung; PERRY, James L. Do Campaign Websites Really Matter in Electoral Civic Engagement? Empirical Evidence From the 2004 Post-Election Internet Tracking Survey. Social Science Computer Review, v.26, n.2, p. 190-212, 2008.

PARMELEE, John H.; BICHARD, Shannon L. Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public. United Kingdom: Lexington Books, 2012.

SCHWEITZER, Eva Johanna. Election Campaigning Online: German Party Websites in the 2002 National Elections. European Journal of Communication; v.20, n.3; p. 327-351, 2005.

STROMER-GALLEY, Jennifer. Interação on-line e por que os candidatos a evitam. In: MARQUES, F., P., A.; SAMPAIO, R., C.; AGGIO, Camilo (Org.). Do Clique à Urna: Internet, redes sociais e eleições no Brasil. Salvador: EDUFBA, p. 29-62, 2013.

______. Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. New York: Oxford University Press. 2014.

TKACH-KAWASAKI, Leslie M. Politics@Japan: Party Competition on the Internet in Japan. Party Politics, v.9, n.1, p. 105-123, 2003.

WARD, Stephen; GIBSON, Rachel. On-line and on message? Candidate websites in the 2001 General Election. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, v.5, n.2, p. 188-205, 2003.

Published

2015-11-10

How to Cite

Aggio, C. de O. (2015). Online Campaigning and Twitter: communicative interaction between campaigns and voters in 2010 Brazilian presidential election. Revista FAMECOS, 23(1), ID22088. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2016.1.22088

Issue

Section

Communication Policy