Discurso-cognição-sociedade: estado atual e perspectivas da abordagem sociocognitiva do discurso

Autores

  • Teun A. van Dijk Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2016.s.23189

Palavras-chave:

Análise crítica do discurso, Abordagem sociocognitiva, Modelos mentais, Modelos contextuais, Conhecimento, Atitudes, Ideologia.

Resumo

Este artigo apresenta o estado da arte da abordagem sociocognitiva nos Estudos do Discurso. A teoria relaciona estruturas do discurso com interação social e estrutura social por meio de uma interface sociocognitiva, baseada no argumento de que estruturas discursivas e estruturas sociais diferem quanto à natureza e não podem ser diretamente relacionadas. A teoria cognitiva consiste, por um lado, de uma dimensão pessoal de modelos mentais pessoais (i) dos eventos sobre os quais se fala ou se escreve, e (ii) da própria situação comunicativa (modelos contextuais), e por outro de uma dimensão social que consiste de crenças, conhecimento, atitudes e ideologias socialmente compartilhadas – que controlam os modelos mentais pessoais, e indiretamente todo discurso. Dessa forma, somos capazes de descrever explicitamente como os discursos estão envolvidos na reprodução de problemas sociais como o racismo e o sexismo. Além disso, a análise cognitiva também descreve e explica vários aspectos do próprio discurso, tais como todas as estruturas discursivas baseadas no conhecimento (coerência semântica local e global, evidências etc.) e na ideologia (a polarização de diferentes estruturas discursivas relacionadas a Nós [endogrupo] e Eles [exogrupo]).

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ANDERSON, J. R. Concepts, propositions, and schemata: What are the cognitive units? Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980.

BADDELEY, A. D. Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001. 0001

BADDELEY, A.; CONVAY, M.; AGGLETON, J. (Eds.). Episodic memory. New directions in research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508809.001.000 1

BARSALOU, L. W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 CAP, P.; OKULSKA, U. (Eds.). Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2013.

CLARK, H. H. Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539

COLLINS, A. M.; QUILLIAN, M. R. Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. In: GREGG, L. W. (Ed.). Cognition and learning. New York: Wiley, 1972.

DE FINA, A.; GEORGAKOPOULOU, A. Analyzing Narrative. Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

DURANTI, A.; GOODWIN, C., (Eds.). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

EAGLY, A. H.; CHAIKEN, S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993.

FILLMORE, C. J. The case for case. In: E. BACH, E.; HARMS, R. T. (Eds.). Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1968. p. 1-88.

GARNHAM, A. Mental models as representations of discourse and text. Chichester, West Sussex, England; New York: E. Horwood Halsted Press, 1987.

GENTNER, D.; STEVENS, A. L. (Eds.). Mental models. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1983.

GIVÓN, T. Context as Other Minds. The pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2005.

GOLDMAN, A. I. Simulating minds. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/01951 38929.001.0001

GRAESSER, A. C.; GERNSBACHER, M. A.; GOLDMAN, S. R. (Eds.). Handbook of discourse processes. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum, 2003.

JASPARS, J.; FRASER, C. Attitudes and social representations. In: FARR, R. M.; MOSCOVICI, S. (Eds.). Social representations. Cambridge/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison des Sciences de l'Homme. 1984. p. 101-123.

JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983.

LAMBRECHT, K. Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511620607

LEVINSON, S. C. Deixis. Entry in the Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1993.

LUKES, S. Power. A radical view. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

OAKHILL, J.; GARNHAM, A. Interpreting elliptical verb phrases at different times of day: Effects of plausibility and antecedent distance. Language and Speech, 30(2), 145-157, 1987.

PLOTKIN, H. C. Necessary knowledge. Oxford; Toronto: Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198568285.001.000 1

PRATKANIS, A. R.; BRECKLER, S. J.; GREENWALD, A. G. (Eds.). Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.

ROSCH, E.; LLOYD, B. B. (Eds.). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, N.J.; New York: L. Erlbaum Associates, distributed by Halsted Press, 1978.

ROYCE, T. D.; BOWCHER, W. L. (Eds.). New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates, 2007.

SCHIFFRIN, D.; TANNEN, D.; HAMILTON, H. E. (Eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2. ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2013.

SEARLE, J. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

SHIPLEY, T. F.; ZACKS, J. M. (Eds.). Understanding events.From perception to action. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780195188370.001.0001

SPERBER, D.; WILSON, D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1995.

STEWART, A. Theories of power and domination. The politics of empowerment in late modernity. London Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE, 2001.

TITSCHER, S.; MEYER, M.; WODAK, R.; VETTER, E. Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Thousand Oaks; Calif.: SAGE, 2000.

TOMASELLO, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

TULVING, E. Elements of episodic memory. Oxford Oxfordshire New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1983.

______. . Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53 (1), 1-25, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114

TULVING, E.; CRAIK, F. I. M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

VAN DIJK, T. A. Prejudice in discourse. An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ pb.v.3

______. Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987.

______. Racism and the press. London; New York: Routledge, 1991.

______. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1993.

______. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London, England: Sage Publications, 1998.

______. Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity. In: WODAK, Ruth; MEYER, Michael (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. p. 95-120, 2001. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d7

______. Discourse and context. A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008a.

______. Discourse and power. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008b.

______. Society and discourse. How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009a.

______. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in preparation), 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404

______. (Ed.). Discourse Studies. 5 vols. Sage Benchmarks in Discourse Studies. London: Sage, 2007.

______. (Ed.). Racism and Discourse in Latin America. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2009b.

VAN DIJK, T. A.; KINTSCH, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York; Toronto: Academic Press, 1983.

ZWAAN, R. A. The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 44, 35-62, 2004.

Downloads

Publicado

2016-12-09

Como Citar

van Dijk, T. A. (2016). Discurso-cognição-sociedade: estado atual e perspectivas da abordagem sociocognitiva do discurso. Letrônica, s8-s29. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2016.s.23189

Edição

Seção

Artigos