Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language

Abstract

Several grammars have done studies on the articulator but. However, it is noted that in all studies of these grammars the mas is classified and separated from its linguistic context. In this separation, one ends by ignoring the possibilities of use and the argumentative value of the articulator, since his relations with the statements that precede and succeed him usually do not receive attention. By studying the relationships between words, utterances and discourses, the Theory of Argumentation in Language (ANL) was chosen to base this research. For the ANL, the argument is in the language itself, and not in facts outside the real world. Thus, meaning will be constructed by the relationship established between words, utterances and discourses strictly in the linguistic context. The area of Discourse Theories where the ANL is, thus, allows a contextualized analysis of the articulator in order to identify its argumentative value. The research aims to verify how the ANL studies the articulators in the discourse and to recover the antecedent threads and the subsequent threads to the mas.