The role of event knowledge in the processing of single sentences

Authors

  • Mahayana Cristina Godoy Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-3290
  • Cláudia Brandão Vieira Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Guilherme Luiz Andrade Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
  • Neemias de Souza Filho Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
  • Marcus Alexandre Nunes Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2017.2.26408

Keywords:

Event knowledge, Language comprehension, Sentence processing, Self-paced reading.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the role of event knowledge in language processing. Empirical research in psycholinguistics argue that event knowledge is part of a set of pragmatic cues that can impact language comprehension. However, a self-paced reading experiment presented here has found no evidence of this effect, indicating that event knowledge, if accessed by readers, did not have any influence in the processing of single sentences that create a highly predictive context. Because this result contradicts previous findings, we argue that (a) the nature of the effects reported by previous experiments needs to be examined; (b) the way experimental items are presented may lead to the adoption of different processing strategies, which could explain the contradiction captured by our experiment; (c) paradigms such as self-paced reading may not be adequate to register the same effects captured by other techniques. Although the second hypothesis may be more suitable to account for our data, we state that it could only be validated by future research on this topic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAAYEN, R. Harald; DAVIDSON, D.; BATES, Douglas, M. Mixed- ffects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 59, p. 390-412, mar. 2008.

BÁSKÁNOVA, Jana; VAN BERKUM, Jos J. A.; WEBER, Kirsten; HAGOORT, Peter. A job interview in the MRI scanner: How does indirectness affect addressees and overhearers? Neuropsychologia, v. 76, p. 79-91, abr. 2015.

BATES, Douglas; MÄCHLER, Martin; BOLKER, Benjamin B.; ALKER, Steven C. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, v. 67, n. 1, p. 1-48, 2015.

BICKNELL, K.; ELMAN, J.; HARE, M.; MCRAE, K.; KUTAS, M. Effects f event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 63, p. 489–505, 2010.

BUZ, Esteban; TANENHAUS, Michael; JAEGER, T. Florian. Dynamically adapted contextspecific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers’ subsequent pronunciations. Journal of Memory and Language, fev. 2016.

CHOW, Wing Yee. The Temporal Dimension of Linguistic Prediction. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland, 2013.

DELONG, K.; URBACH, T.; KUTAS, M. Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, v. 8, p. 1117-1121, 2005.

FEDERMEIER K.; KUTAS M. A rose by any other name: long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 41, p. 469-495, 1999.

FERRETTI, Todd R.; MCRAE, Ken; HATHERELL, Andrea. Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 44, p. 516-547, maio 2001.

FINE, Alex B.; JAEGER, T. Florian; FARMER, Thomas A.; QIAN, Ting. Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLoS ONE, out. 2013.

GODOY, Mahayana; VIEIRA, Cláudia B.; CUNHA LIMA, Maria Luiza. Antecipação e processamento linguístico: uma revisão das principais evidências a favor da previsão. Signo, v. 41, n. 71, p. 63-74, maio-ago. 2016.

HAGOORT, Peter; HALD, Lea A.; BASTIAANSEN, Marcel C. M.; PETERSSON, Karl. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, v. 304, p. 438-441, abr. 2004.

JAGER, A.; PARENTE, M.A. Cognição e eletrofisiologia: uma revisão crítica das perspectivas nacionais. Psico-USF, v. 15, p. 171-180, 2010.

KAMIDE, Yuki; ALTMANN, Gerry TM; HAYWOOD, Sarah L. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 49, n. 1, p. 133-156, jul. 2003.

KUPERBERG, Gina R. Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, p. 1-15, jan. 2016.

KUPERBERG, Gina. R.; JAEGER, T. Florian. What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, v. 31, n. 1, p. 32-50, nov. 2015.

KURUMADA, Chigusa; BROWN, Meredith; TANENHAUS, Michael K. Pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody: It looks like speech adaptation. The proceedings of the 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan, ago. 2012.

KUTAS, Marta; HILLYARD, Steven A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, v. 307, n. 5947, p. 1161-1163, jan. 1984.

LAU, Ellen; HOLCOMB, Phillip J.; KUPERBERG, Gina R. Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single word contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, v. 25, n.3, p. 484-502, 2013.

MCCULLAGH, Peter e NELDER, John Ashworth. Generalized Linear Models, 2. ed. Taylor & Francis. 1989.

MACDONALD Maryellen C.; PEARLMUTTR, Neal J.; SEIDENBERG, Mark S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, v. 101, p. 676-703, 1994.

METUSALEM, Ross; KUTAS, Marta; URBACH, Thomas; HARE, Mary; MCRAE, Ken; ELMAN, Jeffrey. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension, Journal of Memory and Language, jan. 2012.

MILBURN, Evelyn; WARREN, Tessa; DICKEY, Michael Walsh. World knowledge affects prediction as quickly as selectional restrictions: evidence from the visual world paradigm. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, v. 31, n. 4, p. 536-548, 2016.

NIEUWLAND, Mante; Ditman, Tali; KUPERBERG, Gina R. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 63, n. 3, p. 324-346, jul. 2010.

NIEUWLAND, Mante; VAN BERKUM, Jos. A. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, v. 18, p. 1098-1111, 2006.

OTTEN, M.; VAN BERKUM, J. A. Discourse-based word anticipation during language processing: Prediction of priming? Discourse Processes, v. 45, p. 464-496, 2008.

SEIDENBERG, Mark S.; MACDONALD, Maryellen C. A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive science, v. 23, p. 569-588, 1999.

STAUB, Adrian; GRANT, Margaret; ASTHEIMER, Lori; COHEN, Andrew. The influence of cloze probability and item constraint on cloze task response time. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 82, p. 1-17, 2015.

SWETS, Benjamin; DESMET, Timothy; CLIFTON, Charles, Jr.; FERREIRA, Fernanda. Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition, v. 36, p. 201-216, jan. 2008.

TANENHAUS, Michael K. Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 1995.

VAN BERKUM, Jos J. A. The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In: SAUERLAND, U.; YATSUSHIRO, K. (Ed.). Semantics and pragmatics: from experiment to theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. p. 276-316.

VAN BERKUM, Jos J. A; BROWN, Colin M.; ZWITSERLOOD, Pienie; KOOIJMAN, Valesca; HAGOORT, Peter. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v. 31, n. 3, p. 443, maio 2005.

VAN PETTEN, Cyma; LUKA, Barbara J. Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 176-190, 2012.

VIEIRA, Cláudia. B. A atuação de conhecimentos de eventos na compreensão da leitura. 2015. 104 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Curso de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Linguísticos, Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo

Horizonte, 2015.

XIANG, Ming; KUPERBERG, Gina R. Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience. v. 30, n. 6, p. 648-672, 2015.

WARREN, Tessa; MCCONNELL, Kerry. Investigating effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eyemovements in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 14, p. 770-775, 2007.

WICHA, Nicole Y.; MORENO, Eva M.; KUTAS, Marta. Anticipating words and their gender: an event related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, v. 16, n. 7, p. 1272–1288, set. 2004.

YILDIRIM, Ilker; DEGEN, Judith; TANENHAUS, Michael K.; JAEGER, T. Florian. Talkerspecificity and adaptation in quantifier interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 87, p. 128-143, abr. 2016.

ZWAAN, Rolf A.; RADVANSKY, Gabriel A. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, v. 123, n. 2, p. 162-185, 1998.

Published

2018-03-23

How to Cite

Godoy, M. C., Vieira, C. B., Andrade, G. L., de Souza Filho, N., & Nunes, M. A. (2018). The role of event knowledge in the processing of single sentences. Letrônica, 10(2), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2017.2.26408