Semantic contextualism in François Recanati’s philosophy of language

Authors

  • Giuseppe Varaschin Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2016.1.22082

Keywords:

Philosophy of Language, Contextualism, François Recanati, Semantics.

Abstract

This article’s objective is to present to the linguists the philosophical discussion about the role of context in semantic theory. Contextualists claim that certain contextual information that is not demanded by strictly linguistic rules must be present in the meaning we attribute to utterances. An author who has developed persuasive arguments in favor of this position is the French philosopher François Recanati. We will present here some of his arguments and some of the consequences that his hypotheses, if they are exact, imply for linguistic theory. We will conclude with some brief remarks regarding the way linguists should partake on this philosophically originated debate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Giuseppe Varaschin, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Bolsista CNPq e aluno de mestrado do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

References

AUSTIN, John L. Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970.

BACH, Kent. Conversational Impliciture. Mind & Language, Oxford, v. 9, n. 2, p. 124-162, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x

______. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.

BEZUIDENHOUT, Anne. Contextualism and the Role of Contextual Frames. Manuscrito, Campinas, v. 32, n. 1, p. 59-84, jan.-jun. 2009.

BORG, Emma. Minimal Semantics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

CAPPELEN, Herman; LEPORE, Ernie. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470755792

CARSTON, Robyn. Explicature and Semantics. Disponível em: http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/robyn/pdf/explicaturesem.pdf. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2014.

______. Implicature, Explicature and Truth-Theoretic Semantics. In: DAVIS, Steven (Ed.). Pragmatics: a reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

______. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2002.

COHEN, Jonathan. Some remarks on Grice’s views about the logical particles of natural language. In: BAR-HILLEL (Ed.). Pragmatics of Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971.

DUCROT, Oswald. O Dizer e o Dito. Campinas: Pontes, 1987. GRICE, Paul. Presupposition and Conversational Implicature. In: COLE, Peter. Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

______. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

JACKENDOFF, Ray. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.

LEVINSON, Stephen. Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

MORTARI, Cezar. Introdução à lógica. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2001.

MOURA, Heronides; VARASCHIN, Giuseppe F. C. O Significado em Quine e Searle. Calidoscópio, São Leopoldo, v. 11, n. 3, p. 320-327, 2013.

NUNBERG, Geoffrey. Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics, Oxford, v. 12, n. 2, p. 109-132, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jos/12.2.109

PUSTEJOVSKY, James. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.

RECANATI, François. Contextualism and anti-contextualism in the philosophy of language. In: Tsohatzsidis, Savas (Ed.). Foundations of Speech Act Theory. London: Routledge, 1994.

______. Literal Meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

______. Pragmatic Enrichment. Disponível em: <http://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/50/39/59/PDF/Pragmatic_enrichmentFINAL.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 set. 2014.

______. Pragmatics and Semantics. In: HORN, L. R.; WARD, G. (Ed.). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959

______. The Pragmatics of What Is Said. In: DAVIS, Steven (Ed.). Pragmatics: a reader. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

______. Truth-conditional pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

______. Unarticulated Constituents, Linguistics and Philosophy, New York, v. 25, n. 3, p. 299-345, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015267930510

RUSSELL, Bertrand. On Denoting, Mind, Oxford, v. 14, n. 56, p. 479-493, 1905.

SOAMES, Scott. Incomplete Definite Descriptions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Notre Dame, v. 27, n. 3, p. 349-375, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093636680

SPERBER, Dan; WILSON, Deirdre. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1995.

STANLEY, Jason. Making it Articulated. Mind & Language, Oxford, v. 17, n. 1-2, p. 149-168, 2002.

______. Review of François Recanati’s Literal Meaning. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Disponível em: https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/24857-literal-meaning/. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2014.

STANLEY, Jason; SZABO, Zoltán. Quantifier Domain Restriction. Mind & Language, Oxford, v. 15, n. 2-3, p. 219-261, 2000.

STRAWSON, Peter. Introduction to Logical Theory. New York: Routledge, 2011.

TRAVIS, Charles. Meaning’s Role in Truth. Mind, Oxford, v. 105, n. 419, p. 451-466, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/105.419.451

Published

2016-04-28

How to Cite

Varaschin, G. (2016). Semantic contextualism in François Recanati’s philosophy of language. Letrônica, 9(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2016.1.22082