The vis viva controversy and the first work of Kant:in the border between metaphysics and science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-4012.2019.2.32506

Keywords:

Kant. Metaphysics. Physics. Living Forces.

Abstract

The present paper aims to offer an introductory approach of Immanuel Kant’s first work, namely, the Thoughts on the true estimation of living forces, published in 1749. In a first moment, it tries to understand Kant’s possible motivations when publishing this work in vernacular language (even in middle of financial difficulties), from the ambience of the University of Königsberg. Next, it refers briefly to the historical-philosophical context of the controversy about living forces, which basically consisted of a difference between Cartesians and Leibnizians regarding the measurement of the force of a moving body. Finally, it presents Kant’s position in the debate, as it is presented in the mentioned work, evaluating it in its scientific, metaphysical and methodological aspects. The central thesis is that, although Kant’s first work presents gaps with regard the scientific knowledge of his time, he offers interesting contributions to the understanding of the author’s philosophical development.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Elton Cândido Ribeiro, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de são Paulo

Bacharel em teologia (CESJF/MG). Mestre em filosofia pela PUC-SP. Doutorando em filosofia pela mesma instituição. Bolsista da CAPES.

References

BOROWSKI, Ludwig Ernst. “Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immanuel Kants”. In: SCHWARZ, Hermann. Immanuel Kant: ein Lebensbild nach Darstellungen der Zeitgenossen. Halle: Hugo Peter, 1907.

CAMPO, Mariano. Osservazioni sul primo lavoro precritico di Kant. Sulla misura delle forze vive. Rivista de filosofia neo-scolastica, v. 35, p. 265-295, 1943.

CAÑEDO-ARGÜELLES, Juan Arana. “Kant y las tres físicas”. In: SOCIEDAD CASTELLANO-LEONESA DE FILOSOFÍA. En Torno a la Filosofía Natural de Newton: Crisis de la Modernidad. Salamanca, 1991.

CAÑEDO-ARGÜELLES, Juan Arana. Pensamientos sobre la verdadera estimación de las fuerzas vivas. Berna: Peter Lang, 1988.

CASSIRER, Ernst. Kants Leben und Lehre. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer, 1921.

DESCARTES, René. Princípios da Filosofia. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1997.

ERDMANN, Benno. Martin Knutzen und seine Zeit. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wolfischen Schule und insbesondere zur Entwicklungsgeschichte Kants. Leipzig: Verlag von Leopold Voss, 1876.

GRONDIN, Jean. Introducción a la metafísica. Espanha: Herder, 2006.

HANKINS, Thomas L. Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis Viva Controversy. The History of Science Society, v. 56, n. 3, p. 281-297, 1965.

HÖFFE, Otfried. Imanuel Kant. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

ILTIS, Carolyn. Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy. The History of Science Society, v. 62, n. 1, p. 21-35, 1971.

JAMMER, Max. The Concepts of Force. Harper Torchbook, 1962.

KANT, Immanuel. “Thoughts on the true estimation of living forces and assessment of the demonstrations that Leibniz and other scholars of mechanics have made use of in this controversial subject, together with some prefatory considerations pertaining to the force of bodies in general (1746–1749)”. In: WATKINS, Eric (Ed.). Natural Science (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

KANT, Immanuel. „Gedanken von der wahren Schätzung der lebendigen Kräfte und Beurteilung der Beweise, deren sich Herr von Leibniz und andere Mechaniker in dieser Streitsache bedient haben, nebst einigen vorhergehenden Betrachtungen, welche die Kraft der Körper überhaupt betreffen“. In: Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Band 1. Berlin: Georg Reimer, 1910.

KUEHN, Manfred. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

LAUDAN, L. L. The Vis Viva Controversy, a Post-Mortem. The History of Science Society, v. 59, n. 2, p. 130-143, 1968.

LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. “A Brief Demonstration of a Notable Error of Descartes and Others Concerning a Natural Law”. In: LOEMKER, Leroy E. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Philosophical Papers and Letters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Discurso de metafísica”. In: BARAÚNA, Luiz João; CHAUÍ, Marilena; MARICONDA, Pablo Rubén; MATTOS, Carlos Lopes de (trad.). Os Pensadores: Newton-Leibniz. São Paulo: Editora Abril: 1983.

LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Monadologia”. In: BARAÚNA, Luiz João; CHAUÍ, Marilena; MARICONDA, Pablo Rubén; MATTOS, Carlos Lopes de (trad.). Os Pensadores: Newton-Leibniz. São Paulo: Editora Abril: 1983.

LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. “Specimen dyamicum”. In: LOEMKER, Leroy E. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Philosophical Papers and Letters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

LESSING, G. E. Sämtliche Schriften. Band 13. Berlin: Voߒsche Buchhandlung, 1840.

McMULLIN, Ernan. Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame, London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978.

Published

2019-12-18

How to Cite

Ribeiro, E. C. (2019). The vis viva controversy and the first work of Kant:in the border between metaphysics and science. Intuitio, 12(2), e32506. https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-4012.2019.2.32506