Positive Morality and Critical Morality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2015.1.19306Keywords:
critical morality. positive morality. David Hume. contractarianism. reflective equilibrium.Abstract
Moral beliefs and attitudes may vary to great extent across different societies. Even within the same society, the prevailing moral beliefs and attitudes may vary throughout the history of this society. The moral beliefs and attitudes that prevail in a given society, at a given time, constitute the “positive morality” of this society. But can we morally assess the “positive morality”? In this paper I present reasons so as to give this question an affirmative answer. I argue that the moral assessment of the “positive morality” must resort to the general principles of “critical morality”. The conception of “critical morality” that I defend in this paper resumes some aspects of David Hume’s moral philosophy. In the last section of this paper I also argue that formative works of art, such as novels, feature films, and documentary films may participate in the process of rational deliberation required by “critical morality”.
Downloads
References
AINSLIE, D. “The problem of the national self in Hume’s theory of justice”. Hume Studies, 21, 2 (1995), p. 289-314.
ARAUJO, M. Kontraktualismus. In: LOHMANN, G.; POLLMANN, A. (Ed.). Menschen-
rechte: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2912, p. 193-198. <http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2014.152.02>.
______. Três imagens do contrato social: Estado, moralidade e direitos
humanos. Filosofia Unisinos, 15, 2 (2014), p. 101-115.
ARPALY, N. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195152042.001.0001
ARRAS, J. The way we reason now: reflective equilibrium in bioethics. In: STEINBOCK, B. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 46-71.
AUSTIN, J. [1832]. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521546>.
BAIER, A. A Progress of Sentiments: Reflections on Hume’s Treatise. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020382
BENTHAM, J. [1789]. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Londres: Athlone, 1970.
BLACKBURN, S. 2003. Being Good: A Short Introduction to Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804426.001.0001>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192804426.001.0001
CASTIGLIONE, D. History, reason and experience: Hume’s argument against social contract theories. In: BOUCHER, D.; KELLY, P. (Ed.). The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. Londres: Routledge, 1994, p. 95-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392928_chapter_5
DALL’AGNOL, D. “Equilíbrio reflexivo na bioética”. Dissertatio, 34 (2011), p. 139-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15210/dissertatio.v34i0.8699
DEPAUL, M. “Two conceptions of coherence methods in ethics”. Mind, 96, 38 (1987), p. 463-481. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCVI.384.463>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCVI.384.463
______. Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry. Londres: Routledge, (1983).
FRAZER, M. The Enlightenment of sympathy: Justice and the moral sentiments in the eighteenth century and today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390667.001.0001
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390667.001.0001>.
GAUTHIER, D. David Hume, contractarian. The Philosophical Review, 88 (1979), p. 3-38. <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2184777>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2184777
GRISWOLD, C. Imagination: morals, science, and arts. In: HAAKONSSEN, K. (Ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, 2006, p. 22-56, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521770599.002>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521770599.002
HART, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
______. Law, Liberty, and Morality. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963.
HERODOTUS. Histories. Londres: Penguin, 2006.
HUME, D. [1751]. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. New York: Ed. Henry Aiken/Hafner Publishing Co., 1968.
______. [1739/1739]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge/At the Clarendon Press, 1988.
______. On the original contract. In: HAAKONSSEN, K. (Ed.). David Hume: Political Essays. (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). 1994, p. 186-201.
______. [1751]. Uma Investigação sobre os Princípios da Moral. Trad. J. Marques. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 1995.
______. [1739/1739]. Tratado da Natureza Humana. Trad. Déborah Danowski. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2000.
______. The Letters of David Hume: 1727-1765. [S.l.]: Ed. J. Y. T. Greig, 2011, v. 1.
HUNT, L. Torrents of emotion: reading novels and imagining equality. In: Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2008, p. 36-69.
JAYNE, A. Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence: Origins, Philosophy, and Theology. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press, 1998.
LANGE, M. “Exploring the theme of reflective stability: John Rawls’ Hegelian reading of David Hume”. Public Reason, 1, 1 (2009), p. 75-90.
LEMMENS, W. “Reason and tradition in politics: David Hume’s critique of the ‘original contract’”. Ideas y Valores, 15, 1 (1998), p. 3-17.
MACCORMICK, N. H. L. A. Hart. California: Stanford University Press, 1981.
MILLER, D. Social Justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1999.
NEURATH, O. Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis, 3 (1932/1933), p. 204-214. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01886420>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01886420
RADCLIFFE, E. Hume on motivating sentiments, the general point of view, and the inculcation of “morality”. Hume Studies, 20, 1 (1994), p. 37-58.
SHECAIRA, F. Hume and Noncognitivism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 28, 3 (2011), p. 267-287.
SINGER, P.; SINGER, R. The Moral of the Story: An Anthology of Ethics through Literature. Oxford: Blackwel, 2005.
SUGDEN, R. Can a Humean be a contractarian? Rationality, Markets and Morals (Perspectives in Moral Science), ed. M. Baurmann e B. Lahno, 0 (2009), p. 11-23.
WHELAN, F. Hume and contractarianism. Polity, 27, 2 (1994), p. 201-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3235173
WILLIAMS, B. Internal and external reasons. In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers: 1973-1980, 101-113, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235173>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165860.009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p
