Artificial Intelligence and society

a preliminary reflection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.43411

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Janus Point, Social dynamics, Action, Society.

Abstract

The aim is to study, in a first approximation, the impact of the change in the production mode as a result of telematics and the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in many of the applications and repetitive processes in social systems of production and distribution of goods. The method of systemic constructionism was used, which, in short, assumes that data are not data - they are constructions with unassailable theoretical assumptions and that language is the system in which the general limit languages are constructed to obtain and communicate information in society. This leads to a theory of actions somewhat different from those of Parsons and Luhmann - leading to the concept of praxemas, and to a whole new analysis of society and its law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcio Pugliesi, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

PhD and Associate Professor in Law from the University of São Paulo (USP), in São Paulo, SP, Brazil; PhD in Philosophy and Education from the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP), in São Paulo, SP, Brazil; professor at the Faculty of Law of the same institution.

References

Althusser, Louis. 1980. Ideologia e aparelhos ideológicos de Estado. 3. ed. Lisboa: Presença.

Becker, Howard S. 1977. Uma teoria da ação coletiva. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

Bhatt, Ganesh Datt, e Jigish Zaveri. 2002. The enabling role of decision support systems in organizational learning. Decision Support Systems 32 (3): 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00120-8.

Deleuze, Gilles. 2013. Post-scriptum sobre as sociedades de controle. In Conversações, 219-226. São Paulo: Editora 34.

Hobsbawm, Eric J. 2011. A era dos impérios: 1875-1914. 13. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

Hume, David. 2007. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and other writings. Cambridge: Ed. Stephen Buckle

Jacobiak, François. 1991. Pratique de la veille technologique. Paris: Les Éditions d'organisation.

Leftwich, Richard H. 1994. O sistema de preços e a alocação de recursos. 8. ed. São Paulo: Pioneira.

Libby, R. 1985. Availability and the Generation of Hypotheses in Analytical Review. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (2): 649-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490831.

Liebowitz, Jay. 2000. Building organizational intelligence. A knowledge management primer. Florida: CRC.

Marx, Karl. 1969. Le Capital: livre premier: Le développement de la production capitaliste. (Sections I, II et III). Tradudizo por Joseph Roy. Revisado por Karl Marx (1872-1875). Paris: Sociales.

Moles, Abraham, e Élizabeth Rohmer. 1977. Théorie des actes: vers une écologie des actions. Paris: Tournai e Casterman.

Pugliesi, Márcio. 2022. Teoria Geral do Direito. São Paulo: Aquariana/Oca.

Pugliesi, Márcio. 2022a. Filosofia e Direito: delineamentos de uma Filosofia do Direito. São Paulo: Aquariana/Oca.

Pugliesi, Márcio, e André Martins Brandão. 2015. Uma conjectura sobre as tecnologias de Big Data na prática jurídica. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG 67: 453-82. https://doi.org/ 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2015v67p453.

Saldanha, Nelson Nogueira. 1976. Filosofia do Direito. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar.

Savelle. Max (coord.). 1990. História da civilização mundial, vol. 2. Rio de Janeiro: Itatiaia.

Touraine, Alain. 2011. Um novo paradigma: para compreender o mundo de hoje. 4. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Tversky, Amos, e Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (4157): 1124-31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.

Vico, Giambattista. 1971. Opere filosofiche. Firenze: Sansoni.

Whitman, Walt. 2007. Leaves of grass. Nova York: Dover Publications.

Zola, Émile. 2016. Germinal. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Published

2024-01-10

How to Cite

Pugliesi, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and society: a preliminary reflection. Civitas: Journal of Social Sciences, 24(1), e43411. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.43411