Celikates and the limits of a theory of critique without object

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2019.3.31162

Keywords:

Critical theory of society. Frankfurt School. Positivism. Paternalism. Autorreflexivity.

Abstract

The article reviews critically Robin Celikates’ proposal to formulate a theory of critique that thinks its paternalist, indulgent or emancipatory relationship to ordinary social agents (i.e, non-theorists or non-scientists). It argues that the author, counted as belonging to a frankfurtian “new generation”, formulates a model of critique apart from the criticism of concrete objects and that this brings him negative consequences. Under the erroneous assumption that this would offend the agents’ autonomy and cognitive abilities, Celikates interdicts to critical theory the verification of social processes that occur “behind their back”, what ends up making the critical activity itself either unnecessary or incapable of achive its objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luiz Philipe de Caux, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, UFRN, Natal, RN

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil). Professor da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN, Natal, RN, Brasil).

References

BOLTASNKI, Luc; THÉVENOT, Laurent. De la justification: les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Gallimard, 1991.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil, 1997.

BRESSIANI, Nathalie. Uma nova geração da teoria crítica. Discurso, São Paulo, v. 46, n. 1, p. 231-249, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2016.119162. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

CELIKATES, Robin. From critical social theory to a social theory of critique: on the critique of ideology after the pragmatic turn. Constellations, Oxford, v. 13, n. 1, p. 21-40, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1351-0487.2006.00438.x. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019

CELIKATES, Robin. Kritik als soziale praxis: gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie. Frankfurt: Campus, 2009. https://doi.org/10.21898/dia.v58i70.134

CELIKATES, Robin. O não reconhecimento sistemático e a prática da crítica: Bourdieu, Boltanski e o papel da teoria crítica. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, São Paulo, n. 93, p. 29-42, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0101-33002012000200004. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

CELIKATES, Robin. Kritik der pädagogischen Vernunft: Bourdieu, Rancière und die Idee einer kritischen Sozialwissenschaft. In: KASTNER, Jens; SONDEREGGER, Ruth (org.). Pierre Bourdieu und Jacques Rancière: Emanzipatorische Praxis denken. Viena: Turia + Kant, 2014. p. 123-146. https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839417171.317

CELIKATES, Robin. Against manichaeism: the politics of forms of life and the possibilities of critique. Raisons Politiques, [s. l.], n. 57, p. 81-96, 2015. Disponivel em: https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.057.0081. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

CHIAPELLO, Ève. Reconciling the two principal meanings of the notion of ideology: the example of the concept of “spirit of capitalism”. European Journal of Social Theory, London, v. 6, n. 2, p. 155-171, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431003006002001. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

FLECK, Amaro. Afinal de contas, o que é a teoria crítica? Princípios: Revista de Filosofia, Natal, v. 24, n. 44, p. 97-127, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2017v24n44id12083. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

FREYENHAGEN, Fabian. Was ist orthodoxe Kritische Theorie? Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, [s. l.], v. 65, n. 3, p. 456-469, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2017-0031. Acesso em: 22 out 2019.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Erkenntnis und Interesse: mit einem neuen Nachwort. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1973.

HABERMAS, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 4. Aufl. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1987.

HONNETH, Axel. Vorwort. In: CELIKATES, Robin. Kritik als soziale praxis: gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie. Frankfurt: Campus, 2009. p. 9-13. https://doi.org/10.21898/dia.v58i70.134

HORKHEIMER, Max. Traditionelle und kritische theorie. In: HORKHEIMER, Max. Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1988. (Schriften 1936 1941, v. 4), p. 162-216.

JAEGGI, Rahel. Entfrendumg: die Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems. Frankfurt: Campus, 2005.

JAEGGI, Rahel. Was ist eine (gute) Instituition? In: FORST, Rainer et al. (org.). Sozialphilosophie und Kritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2009a. p. 528-544.

JAEGGI, Rahel. Was ist Ideologiekritik. In: WESCHE, Tilo; Jaeggi, Rahel. Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Surhkamp Verlag, 2009b. p. 266-295.

NOBRE, Marcos. Teoria crítica: uma nova geração. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, São Paulo, n. 93, p. 23-27, 2012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-33002012000200003. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

REPA, Luiz. Compreensões de reconstrução: sobre a noção de crítica reconstrutiva em Habermas e Celikates. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, v. 40, n. 3, p. 9-28, 2017. Diponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-31732017000300002. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

SAAR, Martin. Kritik als Genealogie: Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Frankfurt: Campus, 2005.

SAAR, Martin. Genealogische Kritik. In: JAEGGI, Rahel; WESCHE, Tilo. Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2009a. p. 247-265.

SAAR, Martin. Macht und Kritik. In: JAEGGI, Rahel et al. (org.). Sozialphilosophie und Kritik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2009b. p. 567-587.

STEINERT, Heinz. Das Verhängnis der Gesellschaft und das Glück der Erkenntnis: Dialektik der Aufklärung als Forschungsprogramm. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2007.

VOGELMANN, Frieder. Measuring, disrupting, emancipating: three pictures of critique. Constellations, Oxford, v. 24, n. 1, p. 101-112, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12254. Acesso em: 22 out. 2019.

WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Investigações filosóficas. 6. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009.

Published

2019-12-13

How to Cite

de Caux, L. P. (2019). Celikates and the limits of a theory of critique without object. Civitas: Journal of Social Sciences, 19(3), 692–707. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2019.3.31162