O fenômeno do Karōshi e seu dano existencial coletivo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2020.2.34255Palavras-chave:
Direito do trabalho, Direitos fundamentais, Morte por excesso de trabalho (Karōshi), Existencialismo, Dano existencialResumo
Debate o fenômeno do 過労死 (Karōshi), enquadrando-o como um problema social relacionado ao trabalho. Apresenta-o como uma morte súbita decorrente do (excesso) de trabalho. Apresenta o Karōshi como uma forma particular e singular de workaholismo japonês, enraizado em sua própria sistemática de trabalho. Conceitua o Karōshi como uma singularidade da cultura japonesa e como um dano existencial para além do evento individual da morte do trabalhador. Conclui que o Karōshi e, também o Karōjisatsu, perpassam a linha da pessoalidade do dano e devem ser tidos como uma forma de dano existencial coletivo.
Downloads
Referências
Adachi, Setsuko. 2013. A monolinguistic identity in transculturality: japanese and multi-lingualism. In Intersecting identities and interculturality: discourse and practice, edited by Regis Machart, Lim Choon Bee, Lim Sep Neo, and Eriko Yamamoto, 111-129. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Amagasa, Takashi, Takeo Nakayama, Yoshitomo Takahashi. 2005. “Karōjisatsu” in Japan: characteristics of 22 cases of work-related suicide. Journal of Occupational Health 47 (1): 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.47.157.
Aucoin, Peter. 1990. New public management: Canada in comparative perspective. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Clegg, Stewart and James Bailey. 2008. International encyclopedia of organization studies. v. 1. London: Sage.
Dasgupta, Romit. 2014. Salaryman anxieties in Tokyo sonata: shifting discourses of state, family and masculinity in post-bubble Japan. In Gender, nation and state modern Japan edited by Andrea Germer, Vera Mackie, and Ulrike Wöhr, 255-284. New York: Routledge.
Ericksen, Lauro. 2017. Angústia, verdade e subjetividade: Kierkegaard influenciando Heidegger. Dissertatio 45 (1): 24-45. https://doi.org/10.15210/dissertatio.v45i0.10028.
Feenberg, Andrew. 1995. Alternative modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goldmann, Lucien. 1977. Lukács and Heidegger: towards a new philosophy. London: Routledge.
Górnisiewicz, Arkadiusz. 2016. Existentialism as a political problem in Karl Löwith’s thought. History of European Ideas 42 (7): 951-964. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2016.1161538.
Hamao, Yokota. 1997. 浜田市銀人の家庭本会 (Misfit banker’s diary on family breakdown). Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
Hanami, Tadashi, and Fumito Komiya. 2011. Labour law in Japan. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
Harris, Clare and Brian Barraclough. 1997. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders: a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 170 (3): 205-28. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.170.3.205.
Hegel, Georg. 2004. Die philosophie des Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hein, Patrick. 2009. How the Japanese became foreign to themselves: the impact of globalization on the private and public spheres in Japan. Münster: LIT.
Hoberman, Harry and Barry Garfinkel. 1988. Completed suicide in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 27 (1): 689-695. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198811000-00004.
Hosokawa, Migiwa, Seiichiro Tajiri, and Tetsunojo Uehata. 1982. Karōshi: approval of cerebral and cardiovascular diseases as occupational disease and how to prevent them. Tokyo: Rodo Keizawashi.
Inoue, Tatsuo. 1993. The poverty of rights-blind communality: looking through the window of Japan. Brigham Young University Law Review 193 (2): 517-551.
Inoue, Kanji and Mao Matsumoto. 2000. 過労自殺 (suicide from overwork): a spreading occupational threat. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 57 (1): 284-285. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.4.284a.
Ishida, Makoto. 2004. Death and suicide from overwork: the japanese workplace and labour law. In Labour law in an era of globalization: transformative practices and possibilities, edited by Richard Michael Fischl and Joanne Conaghan, 219-232. 2 ed. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Kawahito, Hiroshi. 2014. 過労自殺 (Karōjisatsu). 2 ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Kumazawa, Makoto. 2010. 働きすぎに斃れて: 過労死・ 過労自殺の語る労働史 単行本 (Collapsing from overwork: a labor history that karōshi and karōjisatsu tell). Tokyo: Japan: Iwanami Shoten.
Kuroda, Sachiko and Isamo Yamamoto. 2016. Workers’ mental health, long work hours, and workplace management: evidence from workers’ longitudinal data in Japan. Rieti Discussion Paper Series. 16 (17): 1-34. https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/16e017.pdf.
Morioka, Rika. 2008. Anti-karoshi activism in a corporate-centered society: medical, legal, and housewife activist collaborations in constructing death from overwork in Japan. San Diego: University of California.
North, Robert Scott. 1994. Karōshi and the politics of workers’ compensation in Japan. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
North, Robert Scott and Rika Morioka. 2016. Hope found in lives lost: karōshi and the pursuit of worker rights in Japan. Contemporary Japan 28 (1): 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1515/cj-2016-0004.
Ogino, Masahiro. 2013. Structuralism, post-structuralism and thereafter. In Routledge companion to contemporary Japanese social theory: from individualization to globalization in Japan today, edited by Anthony Elliott, Masataka Katagiri, and Atsushi Sawai, 94-111. New York: Routledge.
Okudaira, Masahiko. 2004. Karōshi (death from overwork) from a medical point of view. Japan Medical Association Journal 47 (5): 205–210. https://www.med.or.jp/english/journal/pdf/jmaj/v47no05.pdf.
Takahashi, Yoshitomo, Hideto Hirasawa, Keiko Koyama, Akira Senzaki, and Kyoko Senzaki. 1998. Suicide in Japan: present state and future directions for prevention. Transcultural Psychiatry 35 (1): 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346159803500206.
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.
Üstün, Tevfik Bedirhan and Norman Sartorius. 1995. Mental illness in general health care. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. A submissão de originais para este periódico implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de sermos um periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais e científicas, desde que citada a fonte (por favor, veja a Licença Creative Commons no rodapé desta página).