El fenómeno del Karōshi y su daño colectivo existencial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2020.2.34255Palabras clave:
Derecho del trabajo, Derechos fundamentales, Muerte por exceso de trabajo (Karōshi), Existencialismo, Daño existencialResumen
Debate el fenómeno del 過労死 (Karōshi), encuadrándolo como un problema social relacionado con el trabajo. Presenta-lo como una muerte súbita derivada del trabajo. Presenta el Karōshi como una forma particular y singular de trabajo japonés, arraigada en su propia sistemática de trabajo. Concibe el Karoshi como una singularidad de la cultura japonesa y como un daño existencial más allá del evento individual de la muerte del trabajador. Concluye que el Karōshi, también el Karōjisatsu, atravesa la línea de la personalidad del daño y debe ser tratado como una forma de daño existencial colectivo.
Descargas
Citas
Adachi, Setsuko. 2013. A monolinguistic identity in transculturality: japanese and multi-lingualism. In Intersecting identities and interculturality: discourse and practice, edited by Regis Machart, Lim Choon Bee, Lim Sep Neo, and Eriko Yamamoto, 111-129. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Amagasa, Takashi, Takeo Nakayama, Yoshitomo Takahashi. 2005. “Karōjisatsu” in Japan: characteristics of 22 cases of work-related suicide. Journal of Occupational Health 47 (1): 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.47.157.
Aucoin, Peter. 1990. New public management: Canada in comparative perspective. Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.
Clegg, Stewart and James Bailey. 2008. International encyclopedia of organization studies. v. 1. London: Sage.
Dasgupta, Romit. 2014. Salaryman anxieties in Tokyo sonata: shifting discourses of state, family and masculinity in post-bubble Japan. In Gender, nation and state modern Japan edited by Andrea Germer, Vera Mackie, and Ulrike Wöhr, 255-284. New York: Routledge.
Ericksen, Lauro. 2017. Angústia, verdade e subjetividade: Kierkegaard influenciando Heidegger. Dissertatio 45 (1): 24-45. https://doi.org/10.15210/dissertatio.v45i0.10028.
Feenberg, Andrew. 1995. Alternative modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goldmann, Lucien. 1977. Lukács and Heidegger: towards a new philosophy. London: Routledge.
Górnisiewicz, Arkadiusz. 2016. Existentialism as a political problem in Karl Löwith’s thought. History of European Ideas 42 (7): 951-964. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2016.1161538.
Hamao, Yokota. 1997. 浜田市銀人の家庭本会 (Misfit banker’s diary on family breakdown). Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten.
Hanami, Tadashi, and Fumito Komiya. 2011. Labour law in Japan. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.
Harris, Clare and Brian Barraclough. 1997. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders: a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 170 (3): 205-28. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.170.3.205.
Hegel, Georg. 2004. Die philosophie des Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hein, Patrick. 2009. How the Japanese became foreign to themselves: the impact of globalization on the private and public spheres in Japan. Münster: LIT.
Hoberman, Harry and Barry Garfinkel. 1988. Completed suicide in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 27 (1): 689-695. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198811000-00004.
Hosokawa, Migiwa, Seiichiro Tajiri, and Tetsunojo Uehata. 1982. Karōshi: approval of cerebral and cardiovascular diseases as occupational disease and how to prevent them. Tokyo: Rodo Keizawashi.
Inoue, Tatsuo. 1993. The poverty of rights-blind communality: looking through the window of Japan. Brigham Young University Law Review 193 (2): 517-551.
Inoue, Kanji and Mao Matsumoto. 2000. 過労自殺 (suicide from overwork): a spreading occupational threat. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 57 (1): 284-285. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.4.284a.
Ishida, Makoto. 2004. Death and suicide from overwork: the japanese workplace and labour law. In Labour law in an era of globalization: transformative practices and possibilities, edited by Richard Michael Fischl and Joanne Conaghan, 219-232. 2 ed. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Kawahito, Hiroshi. 2014. 過労自殺 (Karōjisatsu). 2 ed. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Kumazawa, Makoto. 2010. 働きすぎに斃れて: 過労死・ 過労自殺の語る労働史 単行本 (Collapsing from overwork: a labor history that karōshi and karōjisatsu tell). Tokyo: Japan: Iwanami Shoten.
Kuroda, Sachiko and Isamo Yamamoto. 2016. Workers’ mental health, long work hours, and workplace management: evidence from workers’ longitudinal data in Japan. Rieti Discussion Paper Series. 16 (17): 1-34. https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/16e017.pdf.
Morioka, Rika. 2008. Anti-karoshi activism in a corporate-centered society: medical, legal, and housewife activist collaborations in constructing death from overwork in Japan. San Diego: University of California.
North, Robert Scott. 1994. Karōshi and the politics of workers’ compensation in Japan. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
North, Robert Scott and Rika Morioka. 2016. Hope found in lives lost: karōshi and the pursuit of worker rights in Japan. Contemporary Japan 28 (1): 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1515/cj-2016-0004.
Ogino, Masahiro. 2013. Structuralism, post-structuralism and thereafter. In Routledge companion to contemporary Japanese social theory: from individualization to globalization in Japan today, edited by Anthony Elliott, Masataka Katagiri, and Atsushi Sawai, 94-111. New York: Routledge.
Okudaira, Masahiko. 2004. Karōshi (death from overwork) from a medical point of view. Japan Medical Association Journal 47 (5): 205–210. https://www.med.or.jp/english/journal/pdf/jmaj/v47no05.pdf.
Takahashi, Yoshitomo, Hideto Hirasawa, Keiko Koyama, Akira Senzaki, and Kyoko Senzaki. 1998. Suicide in Japan: present state and future directions for prevention. Transcultural Psychiatry 35 (1): 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/136346159803500206.
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.
Üstün, Tevfik Bedirhan and Norman Sartorius. 1995. Mental illness in general health care. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Civitas: Revista de Ciências Sociais
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El envío de originales para esta revista implica la transferencia, por parte de los autores, de los derechos de publicación impresa y digital. Los derechos de autoría para los artículos publicados son del autor, con derechos de la revista sobre la primera publicación. Los autores solamente podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicados indicando claramente esta revista como el medio de la publicación original. En virtud de ser una revista de acceso abierto, se permite el uso gratuito de los artículos en aplicaciones educacionales y científicas, desde que se cite la fuente (por favor, vea a Licencia Creative Commons a pie de esta página).