A fairclough-based Analysis of Persuasive Strategies in Trump and Biden’s Speeches

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2023.1.44170

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, repetition, creativity, intertextuality

Abstract

This study investigates the inaugural speeches delivered by Trump and Biden in terms of Fairclough’s (1995) three-dimensional method of CDA. It highlights the link between micro and macro analysis of discourse by considering repetition, creativity, and intertextuality as the main persuasive strategies employed by both political leaders to make their audience believe in their ideas. The study also clarifies to what extent Trump and Biden vary in the use of these persuasive strategies in association with power distribution and ideological stands. The results show that Trump constructs a particular type of unity characterized by loyalty and allegiance through his use of pronouns and his thematization of ‘’people’’. By employing metaphors and negative expressions, Trump succeeds in painting a bleak, dark, and scary image of the United States as a country plagued by a rise in crime and a decay in the economy. Moreover, Trump does not venerate the past; rather he positions himself as only being limited by God by only borrowing texts associated with the bible. In contrast, Biden’s liberal ideology stands clear in offering a conception of unity that bands all people together as citizens of the nation by his frequent use of pronouns. He is very skilled at portraying an optimistic view of America’s future through his use of light metaphor and his positive rhetoric. Biden accentuates the idea that disagreement is part of democracy. However, disagreements should not lead to disunion. In addition, Biden tends to use more intertextuality in his speech than Trump. Biden’s ideology depends on accepting the other regardless of his political stands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Shaimaa Mustafa, Department of English, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Shaimaa Mustafa, Department of English, Al-Azhar University, Al Mokhayam Al Daem St., Gameat Al Azhar, Cairo 4434003, Egypt.

References

Ahmed, H. R., & Amir, S. (2021). Speech Act Analysis of the Joseph R. Biden, Jr.’s Inaugural Address on 20th of January 2021 as the 46th President of the USA. Electronic Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 43–55.

Alexander, J. (2015). The Major Ideologies of Liberalism, Socialism, and Conservatism. Political Studies, 63(5), 980–994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12136

Allen, D. R. (2004). Customer Satisfaction Research Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Integrating Customer Loyalty and Satisfaction Metrics in the Management of Complex Organizations. Quality Press.

Austermühl, F. (2014). The Great American Scaffold: Intertextuality and Identity in American Presidential DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.53

Discourse (Vol. 53). John Benjamins.

Bramley, N. R. (2001). Pronouns of Politics: The Use of Pronouns in the Construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in Political Interviews. [Doctoral dissertation, Australian National University]. Open Research Library.https://openresearchrepository.anu.edu.au/bitstream/1885/46225/6/02-whole.pdf

Biden, J. R., Jr. (2021). Inaugural Address by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr/

Blommaert, J., & Mesthrie, R. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction (Vol. 10). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610295

Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance. University of Chicago Press.

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2004). Talking, Creating: Interactional Language, Creativity, and Context. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 62–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.62

Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analyzing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Bloomsbury.

Chung, C. J., & Park, H. W. (2010). Textual Analysis of a Political Message: The Inaugural Addresses of Two Korean Presidents. Social Science Information, 49(2), 215–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018409359370

Cook, R. (2021). America Votes 34: 2019-2020, Election Returns by State (Vol. 34). CQ Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071825174

Delgado, J. A. (2021). Metaphor in Political Discourse: A Speech Case Study of the Incoming 46th US President Joe Biden. Universidad de Salamanca. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2006). Tony Blair and the Language of Politics. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/blair_language_4205jsp/

Gee, J. P. (2010). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847886

Ghani, N. A., & Hussain, M. S. (2021). Application of Fairclough’s Model on Joe Biden’s Victory Speech: Corpus Assisted Analysis of New US Vision Versus World Voices. Psychology and Education, 58(2), 10168–10181.

Ghazani, A. Z. (2016). Study of Persuasive Strategies in Selected American Presidential Speeches. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 631–647.

Goethals, G. R. (2017). Almost “Nothing New Under the Sun”: American Politics and the Election of Donald Trump. Leadership, 13(4), 413–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017724533

Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2016). Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190626594.001.0001

Hakansson, J. (2012). The Use of Personal Pronouns in Political Speeches: A Comparative Study of the Pronominal Choices of Two American Presidents. Linnaeus University.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2008). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2010). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Education.

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. (2005). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 53(2), 193–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2005-0209

Johnson, M., & Lakoff, G. (1980). The Metaphorical Structure of the Human Conceptual System. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0402_4

Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Richardson, J. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8_7

Schmid, H. J., & Ungerer, F. (2013). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835396

Sigelman, L. (1996). Presidential Inaugurals: The Modernization of a Genre. Political Communication, 13(1), 81–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963096

Tannen, D. (2007). Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (Vol. 26). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270

Trump, D. (2017). Inaugural Address. The White House.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalization: Problem or Pseudo-Problem? Discourse & Society, 19(6), 821–828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095897

Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and Discourse. In M. Freeden, L. T. Sargent, & M. Stears. The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 175–196). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.007

Vigil, T. R. (2013). George W. Bush’s First Three Inaugural Addresses: Testing the Utility of the Inaugural Genre. Southern Communication Journal, 78(5), 427–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2013.847479

Wodak, R. (2011). Critical Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Discursive Pragmatics, 8, 50–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.04wod

Downloads

Published

2023-08-18

How to Cite

Mustafa, S. (2023). A fairclough-based Analysis of Persuasive Strategies in Trump and Biden’s Speeches. BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 14(1), e44170 . https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2023.1.44170

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2023 BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The submission of originals to BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.