“A Ler Vamos…” and “L.E.R. Cãofiante”, with students in the first years of schooling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2019.3.32892Keywords:
Reading. Decoding reader. 2nd year of schooling. Reading difficulties. Animal assisted reading.Abstract
Formal learning pathways of reading are heterogeneous, and difficulties should be considered transient and amenable to intervention. This conceptualization has led to systematic and scientifically based intervention strategies, as used in projet “A Ler Vamos…” and “L.E.R. Cãofiante”, with students in the first years of schooling. Thirty-nine students from the 2nd year of schooling in the municipalities of Matosinhos and Silves participated in the study. They were identified as presenting difficulties in reading learning and were divided into two experimental groups and one control group, with equivalence in their performance before the beginning of the intervention. Experimental group benefited from a bi-weekly intervention to promote phonological awareness skills, reading decoding and reading fluency. This action was complemented with 15 minutes session using the Graphogame software and took place between November 2016 and May 2017. Intervention’s effectiveness was evaluated through a design with two measures repeated in time and the group factor (using mixed anovas). The analysis of the results shows the effectiveness of scientifically based intervention. In addition to the quantitative results, some of the experimental groups students obtained a very significant evolution, reaching the average performances of their classes throughout the school year. This study validates the intervention carried out in the municipalities of Matosinhos and Silves, which combined effective strategies in promoting basic reading skills with new technologies. In this communication, considerations will be made on intervention’s evaluation, as well as on the activities carried out and the possibility of generalization of these scientifically based interventions.
Downloads
References
BEETZ, Andrea. Socio-emotional correlates of a schooldogteacher- team in the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, Pully, v. 4, p. 886, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00886
BEETZ, Andrea; MCCARDLE, Peggy. Does reading to a dog affect reading skills? In: GEE, Nancy R.; FINE, Aubrey H.; MCCARDLE, Peggy (ed.). How animals help students learn: research and practice for educators and mental-health professionals. New York: Routledge, 2017. p. 111-123).
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620619-9
CALADO, Margarida da Silva. Motivação para a leitura e hábitos de leitura num programa de leitura/educação assistida por animais. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia) – Instituto Universitário de Ciências Psicológicas, Sociais e da Vida, Lisboa, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cidehus.493
CARVALHO, Anabela de Oliveira Duarte da Cruz. O REI: teste de avaliação da fluência e precisão leitora. Lisboa: Edipsico, 2010.
CITOLER, Sylvia Defior. Las dificultades de aprendizaje: un enfoque cognitivo: lectura, escritura, matemáticas. Málaga: Aljibe, 1996.
CRUZ, Joana Sara et al. “A Ler Vamos…”: um projeto autárquico de promoção da leitura. In: VIANA, Fernanda Leopoldina et al. (coord.). Atas do 10º Encontro Nacional [e] 8º Internacional de Investigação em Leitura, Literatura Infantil e Ilustração. Braga: CIEC, 2014a. p. 400-405. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.cidehus.2620
CRUZ, Joana Sara et al. Contribuição da literacia emergente para o desempenho em leitura no final do 1º CEB. Análise Psicológica, Lisboa, v. 32, n. 3, p. 245-257, 2014b. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.749
CRUZ, Joana Sara et al. O contributo das autarquias para a intervenção psicológica na Educação Infantil. Revista Amazônica, v. 8, n. 1, p. 143-160, 2015.
CRUZ, Vitor. Uma abordagem cognitiva da leitura. Porto: Lidel, 2007.
DECI, Edward L.; RYAN, Richard M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 227-268, 2000. Disponível em: http://users.ugent.be/~wbeyers/scripties2011/artikels/Deci&Ryan_2000.pdf. Acesso em: 13 nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
ELLIOTT, Julian G.; GRIGORENKO, Elena L. The dyslexia debate. New York: Cambridge, 2002.
FLETCHER, Jack M. et al. Learning disabilities: from identification to intervention. New York: Guilford, 2007.
FREDRICKSON, Barbara L. Positive emotions broaden and built. In: DEVINE, Patricia; PLANT, Ashby (ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Burlington: Academic, 2013. v. 47, p. 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2
FREDRICKSON, Barbara L. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, London, v. 359, n. 1449, p. 1367-1378, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
FREDRICKSON, Barbara L.; JOINER, Thomas. Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, New York, v. 13, n. 2, p. 191-220, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00431
GAMBRELL, Linda B. Getting students hooked on the reading habit. The Reading Teacher, [s. l.], v. 69, n. 3, p. 259-263, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1423
GEE, Nancy R.; CHURCH, Meredith T.; ALTOBELLI, Christie L. Preschoolers make fewer errors on an object categorization task in the presence of a dog. Anthrozoös, Hanover, v. 23, n. 3, p. 223-230, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303710x12750451258896
GEE, Nancy R.; CRIST, Elise N.; CARR, Daniel N. Preschool children require fewer instructional prompts to perform a memory task in the presence of a dog. Anthrozoös, Hanover, v. 23, n. 3, p. 173-184, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2752/1753037 10x12682332910051
GOUGH, Philip B.; Tunmer, William E. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 6-10, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
HALL, Sophie Susannah; GEE, Nancy R.; MILLS, Daniel Simon. Children reading to dogs: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS ONE, San Francisco, v. 11, n. 2, e0149759, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149759
HEDIGER, Karin; TURNER, Dennis C. Can dogs increase childrens’s attention and concentration performance? A randomized controlled trial. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 21-39, 2014.
HOOVER, Wesley A.; GOUGH, Philip B. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, Dordrecht, v. 2, n. 2, p. 127-160, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401799
JERE-FOLOTIYA, Jacqueline et al. The effect of using a mobile literacy game to improve literacy levels of grade one students in Zambian schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, Washington, v. 62, n. 4, p. 417-436, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9342-9
LAGES, Mário F. et al. Os estudantes e a leitura. Lisboa: Gabinete de Estatística e Planeamento da Educação, 2007.
LE ROUX, Marieanna; SWARTZ, Leslie; SWARTZ, Estelle. The effect of an animal-assisted reading program in the reading rate, accuracy and comprehension of grade 3 students: a randomized control study. Child Youth Care Forum, [s. l.], v. 43, n. 6, p. 655-673, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-014-9262-1
LOPES, João A. Problemas de comportamento, problemas de aprendizagem, problemas de “ensinagem”. Coimbra: Quarteto, 2001.
MARTINS, Margarida Alves; NIZA, Ivone. Psicologia de aprendizagem da linguagem escrita. Lisboa: Universidade Aberta, 1998.
MATA, Lourdes; MONTEIRO, Vera; PEIXOTO, Francisco. Escala de autoconceito para crianças em idade pré-escolar e 1º/2º ano de escolaridade de Harter e Pike (1981,1984). In: CONFERÊNCIA INTERNACIONAL AVALIAÇÃO PSICOLÓGICA: FORMAS E CONTEXTOS, 13., 2008, Braga. Actas [...]. Braga: APPORT, 2008. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1198
MATHES, Patricia G.; DENTON, Carolyn A. The prevention and identification of reading disability. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, Philadelphia, v. 9, n. 3, p. 185-191, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1053/spen.2002.35498
PEKRUN, Reinhard. Emotions at School. In: WENTZEL, Kathryn R.; WIGFIELD, Allan (ed.). Handbook of motivation at school. New York: Rotledge, 2009. p. 575-604.
PEKRUN, Reinhard et al. Achievement Emotions Questionnaire – Elementary School (AEQ-Elementary School): user’s manual. Munich: University of Munich, 2007.
RIBEIRO, Iolanda et al. Ainda estou a aprender: as tecnologias no apoio à avaliação e à intervenção nas dificuldades na aprendizagem da leitura. Maia: Lusoinfo, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2017.151.03
RIBEIRO, Marta Flora Almeida Dias. Ler bem para aprender melhor: um estudo exploratório de intervenção no âmbito da descodificação leitora. 2005. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia) – Instituto de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade do Minho, Braga, 2005. https://doi.org/10.21011/apn.2017.1502
ROSS, Sarah G.; BEGENY, John C. An examination of treatment intensity with an oral reading fluency intervention: do intervention duration and student-teacher instructional ratios impact intervention effectiveness? Journal of Behavioral Education, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 1, p. 11-32, 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-014-9202-z
SHAW, Donita Massengill. Man’s best friend as a reading facilitator. Reading Teacher, Newark, v. 66, n. 5, p. 365-371, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.01136
SIM-SIM, Inês. O ensino da leitura: a decifração. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação, 2009.
SMITH, Kelly A. Impact of animal assisted therapy reading instruction on reading performance of homeschooled students. [S. l.: s. n.], 2010.
SORIANO, Manuel et al. Examining the efficacy of an intervention to improve fluency and reading comprehension in Spanish children with reading disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, St. Lucia, v. 58, n. 1, p. 47-59, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2011.547349
STANOVICH, Keith E. Matthew effects in reading: some consideration of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, Newark, v. 22, p. 360-407, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.21.4.1
SUCENA, Ana; CASTRO, São Luís. Aprender a ler e avaliar a leitura: o TIL: teste de idade de leitura. Coimbra: Almedina, 2010.
SUCENA, Ana et al. Graphogame português alicerce: software de apoio a crianças disléxicas. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 17., 2015, Pianoro. Proceedings […]. Pianoro: Medmond, 2015. p. 396-405.
TORGESEN, Joseph K. The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, New York, v. 40, n. 1, p. 7-26, 2002.
VAUGHN, Sharon; WANZEK, Jeanne. Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: meaningful impacts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, New York, v. 29, n. 2, p. 46-53, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12031
VELLUTINO, Frank R. et al. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Oxford, v. 45, n. 1, p. 2-40, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
WOHLFARTH, Rainer et al. An investigation into the efficacy of therapy dogs on reading performance in 6-7 year old children. Human-Animal Interaction Bulletin, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 60-73, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Letras de Hoje
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letras de Hoje implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letras de Hoje as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.