Blocos semânticos e conceituais: da linguagem aos conceitos

Authors

  • Alfredo Lescano EFTS, ENFA, Université de Toulouse e CRAL, EHESS/CNRS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2015.3.22610

Keywords:

Teorias representacionais, Teorias linguísticas, Teoria dos Blocos Semânticos, Conceitos.

Abstract

Neste artigo, apresentaremos alguns elementos que favorecem uma análise de conceitos que difere das abordagens representacionais, generalizando os princípios de uma teoria linguística, a Teoria dos Blocos (TBS), que concebe o sentido linguístico envolvendo relações causais e contrastivas. Nosso principal objetivo é a ampliação dessa visão de sentido linguístico para a de conceitos. Baseado em algumas evidências de manifestações não linguísticas de conceitos, redefinirei a estrutura interna de conceitos e discutirei a natureza de sua função.

 

************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

 

Semantic and conceptual blocks: from language to concepts

Abstract: In this paper, we will introduce some elements that favor an analysis of concepts that differs from representational approaches, by generalizing the principles of a linguistic theory, the Semantic Blocks Theory (SBT), which conceives linguistic meaning as involving causal and contrastive connections. Our main goal is the enlargement of this vision of linguistic meaning to that of concepts. Based on some evidence of non-linguistic manifestations of concepts, we will redefine the internal structure of concepts and discuss the nature of their function.

Keywords: Representational theories; Linguistic theories; Semantic Blocks Theory; Concepts

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CAREL, M. La construction du sens des énoncés. Revue romane, 40-1, 79-97, 2005.

CAREL, M. L’entrelacement argumentatif. Lexique, discours et blocs sémantiques. Paris: H. Champion, 2011.

CAREL, M. et DUCROT, O. Le problème du paradoxe dans une sémantique argumentative. Langue française, 123, 6-26, 1999a.

CAREL, M.; DUCROT, O. La semántica argumentativa. Una introducción a la teoría de los bloques semánticos. GARCÍA NEGRONI, M.M; LESCANO A (eds). Buenos Aires: Colihue Universidad, 2005.

DAHL, O. On generics. In: E.L. Keenan (ed) Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99-111, 1975.

FODOR, J. A. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.

FODOR, J. A. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.

FREGE, G. Fonction et concept. In: Ecrits logiques et philosophiques. Paris: Seuil, 1971, 80-101, 1891.

FREGE, G. Concept et objet. In: Ecrits logiques et philosophiques. Paris : Seuil, 1971, 127-41, 1892.

KRIFKA, M. et al. Genericity: An introduction. In: G. Carlson and F.J. Pelletier (eds.). The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-124, 1995.

KURODA, S. Y. Le jugement catégorique et le jugement thétique. Exemples tirés de la syntaxe japonaise. Langages, 30, 81-110, 1973.

LESCANO, A. Deux (autres) maintenant. Avec une application à La Jalousie de Robbe-Grillet. In: M. Carel (ed.). Argumentation et polyphonie. De Saint-Augustin à Robbe-Grillet. Paris: L’Harmattan, 145 188, 2012.

______. Stéréotypes, représentations sociales et blocs conceptuels. SEMEN, 35, 153-170, 2013.

MEDIN, D. Concepts and Conceptual Structure. In: American Psychologist, 44-12, 1469-81, 1989.

RECANATI, F. Indexicality and context-shift. Paper presented at the Workshop on indexicals, speech acts and logophors, Harvard University (11/20/2004), 2004.

ROSCH, E. Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605, 1973.

Published

2015-12-04

How to Cite

Lescano, A. (2015). Blocos semânticos e conceituais: da linguagem aos conceitos. Letras De Hoje, 50(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2015.3.22610

Issue

Section

A linguagem olhada pela Teoria da Argumentação na Língua