Dataficación de la vida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2021.2.39638Palabras clave:
Bios, Comunicación, Dataficación, PlataformasResumen
Este artículo tiene como objetivo discutir la datificación de la vida en la fase actual del desarrollo de la cultura digital a partir de tres ejes: relaciones sociales, conocimiento y naturaleza. La datificación tiene lugar en el seguimiento de las relaciones sociales mediadas por plataformas digitales y como “requisición” del mundo en forma de datos que pueden ser operados en dos dominios principales: naturaleza y conocimiento. La primera forma de requisición se produce mediante la recolección de minerales y energía para producir máquinas y dispositivos y para alimentar la captura, tratamiento y circulación de datos. El segundo es una traducción del mundo en datos, generando una algocracia epistocrática que puede decidir sobre el conocimiento y la gestión de los asuntos públicos. Relacionando la datificación de la vida como los cuatro bios aristotélicos y la comunicación en función de su modo de existencia, podemos concluir que ella no puede reducirse al ámbito de la comunicación en su conjunto, ni identificarse a un bios de la mediatización. La datificación de la vida está en la base de la comunicación contemporánea y es transversal a los cuatro bios.
Descargas
Citas
Ajunwa, Ifeoma. 2020. The ‘black box’ at work. Big Data & Society 7 (2): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720938093.
Barassi, Veronica. 2020. Datafied times: surveillance capitalism, data technologies and the social construction of time in family life. New Media & Society 22 (9): 1545-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913573.
Bates, Jo, Yu-Wei Lin e Paula Goodale. 2016. Data journeys: capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716654502.
Brodie, Patrick. 2020. Climate extraction and supply chains of data. Media, Culture and Society 42 (7-8): 1095-1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720904601.
Bucher, Taina. 2018. If...then: algorithmic power and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Casilli, Antonio A. e Julian Posada. 2019. The platformization of labor and society. In Society and the Internet, organizado por Antonio A. Casilli e Julian Posada, 293-306. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843498.003.0018.
Charitsis, Vassilis. 2019. Survival of the (data) fit: self-surveillance, corporate wellness, and the platformization of healthcare. Surveillance & Society 17 (1/2): 139-144. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12942.
Cheney-Lippold, John. 2017. We are data: algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York: New York University Press.
Conty, Arianne Françoise. 2018. The politics of nature: new materialist responses to the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society 35 (7-8): 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418802891.
Couldry, Nick. 2020. Recovering critique in an age of datafication. New Media & Society 22 (7): 1135-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912536.
Couldry, Nick e Andreas Hepp. 2017. Mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Couldry, Nick e Ulises Ali Mejias. 2019. The costs of connection: how data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Série: Culture and economic life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Couldry, Nick e Jun Yu. 2018. Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world. New Media & Society 20 (12): 4473-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818775968.
Cubitt, Sean. 2017. Finite media: environmental implications of digital technologies. Durham: Duke University Press.
Danaher, John. 2016. The threat of algocracy: reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology 29 (3): 245-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1.
Danaher, John, Michael J Hogan, Chris Noone, Rónán Kennedy, Anthony Behan, Aisling De Paor, Heike Felzmann et al. 2017. Algorithmic governance: developing a research agenda through the power of collective intelligence. Big Data & Society 4 (2): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717726554.
Dijck, José van, Thomas Poell e Martijn de Waal. 2018. The platform society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dourish, Paul. 2016. Algorithms and their others: algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716665128.
Driscoll, Kevin. 2014. Working within a black box: transparency in the collection and production of big twitter data. International Journal of Communication 8: 1745-1764. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2171.
Esmonde, Katelyn. 2020. ‘There’s only so much data you can handle in your life’: accommodating and resisting self-surveillance in women’s running and fitness tracking practices. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 12 (1): 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1617188.
Finn, Ed. 2017. What algorithms want. Imagination in the age of computing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Fisher, Eran. 2020. Can algorithmic knowledge about the self be critical? In The digital age and its discontents: critical reflections in education, organizado por Matteo Stocchetti, 111-122. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16c9hdw.10.
Flusser, Vilem. 2010. O mundo codificado: por uma filosofia do design e da comunicação. São Paulo: Cosac Naify. Frantzen, Mikkel Krause e Jens Bjering. 2020. Ecology, capitalism and waste: from hyperobject to hyperabject. Theory, Culture & Society 37 (6): 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420925541.
Fuchs, Christian. 2009. Social networking sites and the surveillance society: a critical case study of the usage of studiVZ, Facebook, and MySpace by students in Salzburg in the context of electronic surveillance. ICT&S Center Research Repor. Salzburg: Forschungsgruppe U.T.I.
Gabrys, Jennifer. 2016. Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Gabrys, Jennifer. 2011. Digital rubbish: a natural history of electronics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/dcbooks.9380304.0001.001.
Garfinkel, Simson. 2000. Database nation: the death of privacy in the 21st century. Cambridge: O’Reilly.
Gidaris, Constantine. 2019. Surveillance capitalism, datafication, and unwaged labour: the rise of wearable fitness devices and interactive life insurance. Surveillance & Society 17 (1/2): 132-138. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12913.
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2010. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society 12 (3): 347-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738.
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2014. The relevance of algorithms. In Media technologies: essays on communication, materiality, and society, organizado por Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski e Kirsten A. Foot, 167-94. Cambridge:The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009.
Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the internet: platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gozman, Daniel, Wendy Currie, e Jonathan Seddon. 2015. The role of big data in governance: a regulatory and legal perspective of analytics in global financial services. SSRN Electronic Journal. Swift Institute Working Paper n. 2014-0009. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2752561.
Grusin, Richard. 2015. Radical mediation. Critical Inquiry 42 (1): 124-48. https://doi.org/10.1086/682998.
Heidegger, Martin. 2007. A questão da técnica. Scientiae Studia 5 (3): 375-98. https://doi.org/10.1590/S167831662007000300006.
Heidegger, Martin.. 1958. Essais et conférences. Paris: Gallimard.
Helmond, Anne. 2015. The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080.
Hepp, Andreas e Friedrich Krotz, orgs. 2014. Mediatized worlds. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137300355.
Hjarvard, Stig. 2012. Mediatization: theorising the media as agents of social and cultural change. Matrizes 5 (2): 53-91. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v5i2p53-91.
Hong, Sounman, Sun Hyoung Kim, Youngrok Kim e Jeongin Park. 2019. Big data and government: evidence of the role of big data for smart cities. Big Data & Society 6 (1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719842543.
Jin, Dal Yong. 2015. Digital platforms, imperialism and political culture. Routledge. New York: Routledge.
Kember, Sarah e Joanna Zylinska. 2012. Life after new media: mediation as a vital process. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kitchin, Rob. 2014a. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8.
Kitchin, Rob. 2014b. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 1 (1): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An inquiry into modes of existence: an anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2018. Down to earth: politics in the new climatic regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lemos, André. 2020. Epistemologia da comunicação, neomaterialismo e cultura digital. Galáxia 43: 54-66. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-25532020143970.
Lundby, Knut, org. 2014. Mediatization of communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2016. Big data privacy: the datafication of personal information. The Information Society 32 (3): 192-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1153010.
Mattelart, Armand. 2006. História da sociedade da informação. São Paulo: Loyola.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor e Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor e Thomas Ramge. 2018. Reinventing capitalism in the age of big data. New York: Basic Books.
Morris, Jeremy Wade e Sarah Murray, orgs. 2018. Appified: culture in the age of apps. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Nieborg, David B. e Thomas Poell. 2018. The platformization of cultural production: theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society 20 (11): 4275-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694.
Parikka, Jussi. 2012. New materialism as media theory: medianatures and dirty matter. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 9 (1): 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2011.626252.
Parikka, Jussi. . 2015. A geology of media. Electronic mediations, vol. 46. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Peters, John Durham. 2015. The marvelous clouds: toward a philosophy of elemental media. Illinois: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226253978.001.0001.
Plantin, Jean-Christophe e Aswin Punathambekar. 2019. Digital media infrastructures: pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society 41 (2): 163-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818376.
Poell, Thomas, David Nieborg e José van Dijck. 2020. Plataformização. Fronteiras – estudos midiáticos 22 (1): 2-10. https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2020.221.01.
Pohl, Lucas. 2020. Ruins of gaia: towards a feminine ontology of the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society 37 (6): 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420934546.
Ratti, Carlo e Matthew Claudel. 2016. The city of tomorrow: sensors, networks, hackers, and the future of urban life. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Redden, Joanna. 2018. Democratic governance in an age of datafication: lessons from mapping government discourses and practices. Big Data & Society 5 (2): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718809145.
Schor, Juliet B., William Attwood-Charles, Mehmet Cansoy, Isak Ladegaard e Robert Wengronowitz. 2020. Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society 49: 833-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y.
Sloterdijk, Peter e Wieland Hoban. 2013. You must change your life: on anthropotechnics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sodré, Muniz. 2002. Antropológica do espelho. Uma teoria da comunicação linear e em rede. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Srnicek, Nick e Laurent De Sutter. 2016. Platform capitalism. Série theory redux. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Striphas, Ted. 2015. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18 (4/5): 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577392.
Thylstrup, Nanna Bonde. 2019. Data out of place: toxic traces and the politics of recycling. Big Data & Society 6 (2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719875479.
Thylstrup, Nanna Bonde, Mikkel Flyverbom e Rasmus Helles. 2019. Datafied knowledge production: introduction to the special theme. Big Data & Society 6 (2): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719875985.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Civitas: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
El envío de originales para esta revista implica la transferencia, por parte de los autores, de los derechos de publicación impresa y digital. Los derechos de autoría para los artículos publicados son del autor, con derechos de la revista sobre la primera publicación. Los autores solamente podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicados indicando claramente esta revista como el medio de la publicación original. En virtud de ser una revista de acceso abierto, se permite el uso gratuito de los artículos en aplicaciones educacionales y científicas, desde que se cite la fuente (por favor, vea a Licencia Creative Commons a pie de esta página).
