Women, New Right-Wings, WhatsApp and the reinvention of the Home-Street relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.44816Keywords:
Women, New Right-Wings, Identity policies, Politics of emotions, Connecting digital technologiesAbstract
In this article, we seek to understand which dispositions and capacities have allowed the intensification, in the last decade, of the political engagement of women in the New Right-Wings. Our interpretative hypothesis is that the expansion of the involvement of conservative women with political issues occurs and is favored by a complex articulation between Identity Policies, economies of affection and emotions, public-private and digital technologies of connection. We propose an interpretative and speculative discussion, inspired by empirical elements produced in longitudinal digital ethnographic research through which we have tracked digital traits of conservative women from the middle segments of the Metropolitan Region of Greater Vitória (ES, Brazil). We adopted a relational and constructionist approach, considering theoretical-methodological elements of the Actor-Network Theory, of the Studies of Affects and Emotions, and the reading of the House-Street relationship proposed by Roberto DaMatta.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2004. Collective feelings. Theory, Culture, and Society 21 (2): 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404042133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404042133
Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The female complaint. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389163
Bennett, W. Lance, e Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Berardi, Franco. 2017. Futurability: the age of impotence and the horizon of possibility. New York: Verso Books.
Bernstein Mary. 1997. Celebration and suppression: the strategic uses of identity by the lesbian and gay movement. American. Journal of Sociology 103 (3): 531-65. https://doi.org/10.1086/231250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231250
Biroli, Flávia. 2021. Gênero e política: igualdade de gênero e diversidade sexual na crise da democracia. Reciis 15 (3): 736-49. https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v15i3.2447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v15i3.2447
Boler, Megan e Elizabeth Davis. 2018. The affective politics of the “post-truth” era: feeling rules and networked subjectivity. Emotion, Space and Society 27: 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002
Boler, Megan, e Elizabeth Davis. 2020. Affective politics of digital media. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003052272
Bucher, Tania. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
Caldeira Neto, Odilon. 2020. Neofascismo, Nova República e a ascensão das direitas no Brasil. Conhecer: debates entre o público e o privado 10 (24): 120-40. https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2020.10.24.2060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32335/2238-0426.2020.10.24.2060
Callon, Michel, e John Law. 1987. After the individual in society: lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology (22): 165-82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3341747
Chaloub, Jorge G. S., Pedro Lima e Fernando Perlatto. 2018. Apresentação: direitas no Brasil contemporâneo. Teoria e Cultura 13 (2): 9-21. https://doi.org/10.34019/2318-101X.2018.v13.13988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34019/2318-101X.2018.v13.13988
Carone, Renata R. 2018. A atuação do movimento feminista no Legislativo Federal: caso da Lei Maria da Penha. Lua nova 105: 181-216. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-181216/105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-181216/105
DaMatta, Roberto. 1997. A casa e a rua. Rio de janeiro: Rocco.
DaMatta, Roberto. 1984. O que faz o brasil, Brasil? Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
Dau, Arthur, Márcia P. Palassi, e Marta Z. e Silva. 2019. Consciência política e participação dos representantes da sociedade civil no conselho municipal de assistência social de Vitória-ES. Cadernos Ebape 17 (1): 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395169859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395169859
Davis, Richard. 1999. The web of politics: the Internet’s impact on the American political system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dietze, Gabrielle, e Julia Roth. 2020. Right-wing populism and gender: European perspectives and beyond. New Rockford: Transcript. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839449806
Dumont, Louis. 1986. Essays on individualism: modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Espinosa, Benedictus de. 1983. Ética. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
Fonseca, Cláudia. 1995. Vacas sagradas da nossa época. Família em processos contemporâneos: inovações culturais na sociedade brasileira. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Gohn, Maria da Glória. 2022. Ativismos no Brasil: movimentos sociais, coletivos e organizações sociais civis como impactam e por que importam? Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
Gregg, Melissa, e Gregory J. Seigworth. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393047
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551-75. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Kalil, Isabela O. 2018. Notas sobre ‘Os fins da democracia’: entografar protestos, manifestações e enfrentamentos políticos. Ponto Urbe (22): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.4000/pontourbe.3933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/pontourbe.3933
Latour, Bruno. 1994. Jamais Fomos Modernos: Ensaio de Antropologia Simétrica. Rio de Janeiro: Editora 34.
Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lavalle, Adrián G., e Euzeneia Carlos. 2022. Desastre e desgovernança no Rio Doce: atingidos, instituições e ação coletiva. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.
Lévy, Pierre. 2003. O que é o Virtual? São Paulo: Editora 34.
Losekann, Cristiana. 2019. Performances coordenadas e experiências compartilhadas na mobilização do direito em conflitos ambientais: a contribuição do pragmatismo de John Dewey. Plural 26 (2): 174-99. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-8099.pcso.2019.165679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-8099.pcso.2019.165679
Losekann, Cristiana. 2018. Não foi acidente! O lugar das emoções na mobilização dos afetados pela ruptura da barragem de rejeitos da mineradora Samarco no Brasil. In Mineração, violências e resistências, um campo aberto à produção de conhecimento no Brasil, organizado por Andréa Zhouri, 67-110. Marabá: Iguana.
Lugones, Maria. 2008. Colonialidad y género. Tabula Rasa (9): 73-102. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.340
Massumi, Brian. 1995. The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique 31: 83-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446
Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging codes: collective action in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891
Mol, Annemarie. 2010. Actor-network theory: sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50 (1): 253-69.
Nagle, Angela. 2021. Kill all normies: online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-right. Connecticut: Tantor Audio.
Nascimento, Leonardo F., Leticia Cesarino, Paulo Fonseca, Tarssio Barreto, e Vitor Mussa. 2022. Públicos refratados: grupos de extrema-direita brasileiros na plataforma Telegram. Revista Internet e Sociedade (3) 1: 31-60.
Oliveira, Daniela R. de. 2017. As interações entre o movimento feminista e o estado: uma proposta de análise. Anais do Seminário de Ciências Sociais. III Seminário de Ciências Sociais -PGCS Ufes. 12 a 14 de novembro de 2018, Ufes, Vitória-ES, Brasil.
Oliveira, Roberto C. 1995. Antropologia e a crise dos modelos explicativos. Estudos Avançados 9: 213-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141995000300017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40141995000300017
Orgadi, Shani. 2009. How can researchers make sense of the issues involved in collecting and interpreting online and offline data? In Internet inquiry Conversations about method, organizado por Annette N. Markham e Nancy Baym, 33-53. Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329086.n4
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective publics: sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001
Pavesi, Patricia P., e Maria Cristina Dadalto. 2019. Ciberespaço e emoções: a digitalização do medo na crise de segurança pública e aquartelamento da Polícia Militar/ES de 2017. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia 7 (16): 207-34. https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20336/rbs.500
Peirano, Mariza. 1990. Os antropólogos e suas linhagens. Brasília: UnB.
Pereira, Marcus A. 2011. Internet e mobilização política: os movimentos sociais na era digital. IV Encontro da Compolítica, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro de 13-15 abril de 2011.
Persson, Janaína N. 2021. Os discursos sobre gênero das deputadas ultraconservadoras bolsonaristas. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios del Discurso 21 (1): 104-26. https://doi.org/10.35956/v.21.n1.2021.p.104-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35956/v.21.n1.2021.p.104-126
Risério, Antônio. 2019. Sobre o relativismo pós-moderno e a fantasia fascista da esquerda identitária. Rio de Janeiro: Topbooks.
Traverso, Enzo. 2019. Do fascismo ao pós-fascismo. Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Américas 13 (2): 12-44. https://doi.org/10.21057/10.21057/repamv13n2.2019.26801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21057/10.21057/repamv13n2.2019.26801
Topinka, Robert, Alan Finlayson, e Cassian Osborne-Carey. 2021. The trap of tracking: digital methods, surveillance, and the far right. Surveillance & Society 19 (3): 384-88. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v19i3.15018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v19i3.15018
Tufekci, Zeynep. 2014. Social movements and governments in the digital age: evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs 68 (1): 1-18.
Woolley, Samuel e Philip N. Howard, ed. 2018. Computational propaganda: Political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Civitas: journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).