Max Weber’s social ontology
A rereading from Brian Epstein’s anchor individualism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2022.1.42835Keywords:
Max Weber, Social Ontology, Anchor individualism, Brian EpsteinAbstract
The article presents a re-reading of Max Weber’s sociology based on Brian Epstein’s anchor individualism. After presenting Gert Albert’s thesis on Weber’s ontology, we reconstruct, in its broad outlines, the concepts of anchoring and grounding in Epstein’s individualistic ontology. We thus demonstrate that for Weber the social level is “anchored” in individuals conceived in their double dimension as bio-psychological and cultural beings. Regarding the “grounding” of the social, we show that the concept of meaningful action can be read as a form of mental projection that finds its collective translation in the dimension of institutionalized social relations [Social Order]. In this way, the relationship between the institutional level and the individual level is not thought of in terms of direct causation, but as “dependence” [grouding].
Downloads
References
Albert, Gert. 2010. Warum und wann die verdinglichende Rede vom Sozialen richtig ist! Eine realistische Alternative zum sozialontologischen Fiktionalismus. In Dimensionen und Konzeptionen von Sozialität, organizado por Gert Albert, Rainer Greshoff e Rainer Schützeichel, 317-38. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92519-6_17
Archer, Margaret. 1995. Realist Social Theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557675
Davidson, Donald. 2001. Actions, reason, and causes. In Essays on actions and events, organizado por Donald Davidson, 3-20. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246270.003.0001
Epstein, Brian. 2014. What is individualism in social ontology? Ontological individualism vs. anchor individualism. In Rethinking the Individualism/Holism Debate: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science, organizado por Finn Collin e Julie Zahle, 17-38. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05344-8_2
Epstein, Brian. 2015. The ant trap: rebuilding the foundations of the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199381104.001.0001
Epstein, Brian. 2019. Anchoring and grounding: reply to Schaffer. Philosophy and phenomenological research 99 (3): 768-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12644
Kühler, Michael, e Markus Rüther. 2016. Handbuch Handlungstheorie: Grundlagen, Kontexte, Perspektiven. Heidelberg: J. B. Metzler. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05359-6
Lepsius, M. Rainer. 2005. Eingenart und Potenzial des Webers-Paradigmas. In Das Weber-Paradigma: Studien Zur Weiterentwicklung Von Max Webers Forschungsprogramm, organizado por Gert Albert, Agathe Bienfait, Steffen Sigmund e Claus Wendt, 32-41. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Salice, Alessandro, e Hans Bernhard Schmid. 2016. The phenomenological approach to social reality. Berlim: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27692-2
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 2005. Handlung, Ordnung und Kultur. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 2009. Grundlegungen der Soziologie: eine Theoriegeschichte in systematischer Absicht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Schluchter, Wolfgang. 2014. Os conceitos sociológicos fundamentais: a fundamentação da sociologia compreensiva de Max Weber. In O desencantamento do mundo: seis estudos sobre Max Weber, organizado por Wolfgang Schluchter, 193-225. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.
Schütz, Alfred. 2018. A construção significativa do mundo social: uma introdução à sociologia compreensiva. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Searle, John. 1995. The construction of social reality. Nova York: Free.
Sell, Carlos Eduardo. 2021. A ontologia social analítica: por uma interlocução com a teoria sociológica. Dados 64 (2): 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2021.64.2.238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/dados.2021.64.2.238
[MWG I/23] Weber, Max. 2013. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Soziologie. Unvollendet. 1919-1920. Editado por Knut Borchardt, Edith Hanke e Wolfgang Schluchter. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
[MWG I/07] Weber, Max. 2018a. Zur Logik und Methodik der Sozialwissenschaften. Schriften 1900-1907. Editado por Gerhard Wagner, em conjunto com Claudius Härpfer, Tom Kaden, Kai Müller e Angelika Zahn. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
[MWG I/12] Weber, Max. 2018b. Verstehende Soziologie und Werturteilsfreiheit. Schriften und reden (1908-1917). Organizado por Johannes Weiss e Sabine Frommer. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Civitas: journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).