Machines of prediction and control and the crisis of the possible

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2021.2.39664

Keywords:

Possible, Society of control, Speculation, Future, Big data

Abstract

This work, the result of a discussion carried out in a PhD thesis, analyzes how the possible, a temporal category that belongs to the future, has been increasingly captured by mechanisms of power characteristic of the so-called societies of control. The field of possibilities is being circumscribed today not only by homogenizing visions of the future that predominate in the imaginary (such as the technological future of science fiction), but also by increasingly refined mechanisms of control that predict and induce our next steps, diminishing our ability to choose, our imagination and our subjectivities. This essay analyzes these different forms of hijacking the possible, going through the machinery of modern sciences and financial speculation, until getting to the information currently stored as big data, the data flow fed by the algorithms that control and predict our next choices. The paper questions, at the end, what other types of speculation could, instead of closing the field of possibilities, expand and intensify it, remaining open to difference, uncertainty and contingencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alana Soares Albuquerque, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Ufrgs), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Doutora e mestre em Psicologia Social e Institucional pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Ufrgs), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Psicóloga graduada pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (Furg), Rio Grande, RS, Brasil. Pesquisadora do grupo Corpo, Arte e Clínica da Ufrgs.

References

Benjamin, Walter. 2012. Sobre o conceito de história. In Magia e técnica, arte e política, Obras escolhidas, vol. 1, 241-252. São Paulo: Brasiliense.

Berardi, Franco. 2011. After the future. Oakland: AK Press.

Berardi, Franco. 2017. Futurability: the age of impotence and the horizon of possibility. New York: Verso.

Danowski, Déborah e Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2014. Há mundo por vir? Ensaio sobre os medos e os fins. Florianópolis: Cultura e Barbárie.

Debaise, Didier e Isabelle Stengers. 2017. The insistence of possibles: towards a speculative pragmatism. Parse Journal 7: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.065.0082

Deleuze, Gilles e Felix Guattari, 2012. Mil platôs. capitalismo e esquizofrenia 2, vol. 3. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. 34.

Deleuze, Gilles e Felix Guattari. 2010. O que é a filosofia? São Paulo: Ed. 34.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Post-scriptum sobre as sociedades de controle. In Conversações, 223-230. São Paulo: Ed. 34.

Deleuze, Gilles. 2010. Sobre o teatro: um manifesto de menos. O esgotado. Rio de Janeiro: Zahaar.

Eshun, Kodwo. 2003. Further considerations on Afrofuturism. The new centennial review 3 (2): 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2003.0021

Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist realism: is there no alternative? Winchester: O Books, 2009.

Foucault, Michel. 2008. Segurança, território, população. Curso dado no Collège de France. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

Grosz, Elizabeth. 2004. The nick of time: politics, evolution and the untimely. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

Guattari, Felix. 1990. As três ecologias. Campinas: Papirus.

Han, Byung-Chul. 2018. No enxame: perpectivas do digital. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Kaiser, Mario. 2015. Reactions to the future: the chronopolitics of prevention and preemption. NanoEthics 9 (2): 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-015-0231-4.

Lapoujade, David. 2016. Por uma utopia não utópica? In O novo espírito utópico, organizado por Adauto Novaes, 115-128. São Paulo: Edições Sesc.

Lapoujade, David. 2017. As existências mínimas. São Paulo: n-1 edições.

Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2006. As revoluções do capitalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

Massumi, Brian. 2010. The future birth of the affective fact: the political ontology of threat. In The affect theory reader, organizado por Melissa Gregg e Gregory J. Seigworth, 52-70. London: Duke University Press.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2012. A gaia ciência. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2012.

Pelbart, Peter Pál. 1993. A nau do tempo-rei: sete ensaios sobre o tempo da loucura. Rio de Janeiro: Imago.

Rolnik, Suely. 2018. Esferas da insurreição: notas para uma vida não cafetinada. São Paulo: n-1 edições.

Shaviro, Steven. 2018. Unpredicting the future. Alienocene: Journal of the First Outernational. Acessado em 11 maio. 2018, https://alienocene.com/2018/04/01/futurity-andsciencefiction

Srnicek, Nick e Alex Williams. 2016. Inventing the future: postcapitalism and a world without work. New York: Verso.

Tarde, Gabriel. 2007. Os possíveis. In Monadologia e sociologia – e os outros ensaios, 191-233. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.

Uncertain Commons. 2013. Speculate this! Durham: Duke University Press.

Published

2021-08-24

How to Cite

Albuquerque, A. S. (2021). Machines of prediction and control and the crisis of the possible. Civitas: Journal of Social Sciences, 21(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2021.2.39664