Liberdade social e socialização do mercado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.31415Keywords:
Liberdade social, Eticização do mercado, Patologias sociais do mercado, Transformação constitutiva.Abstract
O artigo parte do conceito de liberdade social e nele identifica os critérios da liberdade, do bem-estar e da solidariedade, enfatizando por meio do último que a implementação da cooperação econômica deve ser experimentada como reciprocamente benéfica. Após identificar patologias da liberdade social que são induzidas pelo mercado capitalista, diferencia duas variantes da remodelagem do mercado: sua eticização externa e a interna, defendendo as vantagens da última, na qual as corporações de Hegel e as associações de Honneth desempenham papel importante. Porém, dadas as fraquezas da eticização interna, aborda-se o mercado como transformável não apenas regulativa, mas constitutivamente. Aqui tratou-se de uma reforma igualitária do direito de herança, por meio da qual a socialização da propriedade empresarial oferece um potencial substancial para o reforço da liberdade social.
Downloads
References
CASTEL, Robert. Die Stärkung des Sozialen. Leben im neuen Wohlfahrtsstaat, Hamburg: Hamburger Edition., 2005.
COHEN, Gerald A.. Sozialismus: Warum nicht? München: Knaur, 2010.
COHEN, Joshua; ROGERS, Joel. Secondary associations and democratic, 1995. Governance. In: Joshua Cohen; Joel Rogers. Associations and democracy, London: Verso, 1995, p. 7-100.
CORNEO, Giacomo. Public Stock Ownership. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, v. 89, n. 1, p. 11-24, 2018 <10.1111/apce.12193>.
DURKHEIM, Emile. Einige Bemerkungen über die Berufsgruppen. In: Emile Durkheim. Über soziale Arbeitsteilung. Studie über die Organisationhöherer Gesellschaften, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988. p. 41-75.
ELLMERS, Sven. Freiheit und Wirtschaft. Theorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft nach Hegel, Bielefeld: Transcript, 2015.
ELSON, Diane. Market Socialism or Socialization of the Market? New Left Review, v. 172, n. 1, p. 3-44, 1988.
ELSTER, Jon. From here to there; or, if cooperative ownership is so desirable, why are there so few cooperatives? Social Philosophy and Policy, v. 6, n. 2, p. 93–111, 1989 <10.1017/S0265052500000650>.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gøsta: Die drei Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus. Zur Politischen Ökonomie des Wohlfahrtsstaats. In: Stephan Lessenich u.a. (org.): Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus: Der Sozialstaat in vergleichender Perspektive, Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus, 1998. p. 19-56.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 v. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1981.
HARTMANN, Martin; HONNETH, Axel. Paradoxien des Kapitalismus. Berliner Debatte Initial, v. 15, n. 1, p. 4-17, 2004.
HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (1821). In: Werke in zwanzig Bänden, hrg. v. Eva Moldenhauer u. Karl Markus Michel, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, v. 7, 1986.
HIRST, Paul Q.. Can secondary associations enhance democratic governance? In: Joshua Cohen; Joel Rogers. Associations and democracy, London: Verso, 1995. p. 101-113.
HONNETH, Axel. Arbeit und Anerkennung. Versuch einer Neubestimmung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, v. 56, n. 3, p. 327-341, 2008.
HONNETH, Axel. Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit, Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011.
HONNETH, Axel. Die Moral im Kapital. Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, v. 39, n. 4, p. 583-594, 2011b.
HONNETH, Axel. Idee des Sozialismus: Versuch einer Aktualisierung, Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015a.
HONNETH, Axel. Rejoinder. Critical Horizons, v. 16, n. 2, p. 204–226, 2015b <10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000048>.
JÜTTEN, Timo. Is the market a sphere of social freedom? Critical Horizons, v. 16, n. 2, p. 187-203, 2015 <10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000047>.
JÜTTEN, Timo. Kann Hegel Solidarität und Wettbewerb versöhnen? In: Sven Ellmers; Steffen Herrmann (orgs.). Korporation und Sittlichkeit. Zur Aktualität von Hegels Theorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, München: Fink, 2017.
KUCH, Hannes. Ökonomie, Subjektivität und Sittlichkeit. Hegel und die Kritik des kapitalistischen Marktes. In: Sven Ellmers; Philiph Hogh (orgs.): Warum Kritik? Begründungsformen kritischer Theorien, Weilerswist: Velbrück, prelo.
LAITINEN, Arto. Freedom’s Left? Market’s Right? Morality’s Wrong? In: Giorgio Baruchello u.a. (orgs.). Ethics, Democracy, and Markets: Nordic Perspectives on World Problems, Kopenhagen: NSU Press, 2016.
LEVINE, Andrew. Democratic Corporatism and/or Socialism. In: Joshua Cohen; Joel Rogers. Associations and democracy, London: Verso, 1995. p. 157-166.
MARSHALL, Thomas H.. Staatsbürgerrechte und soziale Klassen. In: Thomas H. Marshall. Bürgerrechte und soziale Klassen. Zur Soziologie des Wohlfahrtsstaates, Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1992. p. 33-94.
MARX, Karl. Das Kapital I (1867). In: Marx-Engels-Werke (MEW), Berlin, v. 23, 1962.
MARX,, Karl. Zur Judenfrage. In: Marx-Engels-Werke (MEW), v. 1, Berlin, 1974. p. 347–377.
MILLER, David. Market, State, and Community. Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism, Oxford: Clarendon, 1989.
NANCE, Michael Honneth’s Democratic Sittlichkeit and market socialism. Manuscrito indédito 2014.
OFFE, Claus. Zu einigen Widersprüchen des modernen Sozialstaates. In: Claus Offe. Arbeitsgesellschaft. Strukturprobleme und Zukunftsperspektiven, Frankfurt: Campus, 1984. p. 323-339.
O’NEILL, Martin and WILLIAMSON, Thad (orgs.). Property-owning democracy: Rawls and Beyond, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
RAWLS, John. Gerechtigkeit als Fairness. Ein Neuentwurf, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003.
SCHAUB, Jörg. Misdevelopments, pathologies, and normative revolutions: normative reconstruction as method of Critical Theory. Critical Horizons, v. 16, n. 2, p. 107–130, 2015 <10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000043>.
SCHWEICKART, David. After Capitalism. Rowman and Littlefield, 2002.
STREECK, Wolfgang. How Will Capitalism End? Essays on a Failing System. London: Verso, 2017.
WOOD, Allen W.. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
WRIGHT, Erik O.. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso, 2010.
ZURN, Christopher. The ends of economic history: alternative teleologies and the ambiguities of normative reconstruction. In: Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch (org.), Die Philosophie des Marktes, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).