Recognition, identity and social conflict: debates in the perspective of political and social theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2019.2.29915Keywords:
Recognition. Identities. Social conflict. Political and social theory.Abstract
Identity debates have been a significant part of the reflections of the social sciences in the last decades, stimulated to a large extent by the authors’ formulations that dealt with the subject of recognition. The views and disputes on this subject are many, and they have greatly increased; but it may be possible to organize them around a common discussion, as proposed by Rahel Jaeggi. We chose to present the notions of recognition and identity proposed by Charles Taylor, Axel Honneth and Judith Butler, trying to show that there is a connection underlying these perspectives, which are rarely read as part of the same tradition, namely, the Hegelian inheritance. Finally, we discuss the substantive differences between a positive and a negative notion of recognition and identities, and we point out the potentialities of a research agenda in social and human sciences that adopts some of the fundamental premises of negative recognition.
Downloads
References
BENJAMIN, Jessica. Like subjects, love objects: essays on recognition and sexual difference. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1023/b:aseb.0000014613.45488.69
BERNSTEIN, Jay. From self-consciousness to community: act and recognition in the Master-Slave. In: PELCZYNSKI, Z. A. The state and civil society: studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. p. 14-39.
BHABHA, Homi. The location of culture. London: Routledge, 1994.
BRAH, Avtar. Cartographies of diaspora: contesting identities. London: Routledge, 1996.
BRAIDOTTI, Rosi. Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i17.4305
BUTLER, Judith. Subjects of desire: Hegelian reflections in twentieth-century France. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472545688.ch-001
BUTLER, Judith. Fundamentos contingentes: o feminismo e a questão do ‘pósmodernismo’. Cadernos Pagu, Campinas, v. 11, p. 11-42, 1998.
BUTLER, Judith. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso, 2004.
BUTLER, Judith. Problemas de gênero: feminismo e subversão de identidade. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.30715/rbpe.v19.n1.2017.10819
BUTLER, Judith. Quadros de guerra: quando a vida é passível de luto? Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2015.
BUTLER, Judith; SPIVAK, Gayatri. Who sings the Nation-State. Calcuta: Seagull Books, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409106356
COOLE, Diana. Is class a difference that makes a difference? Radical Philosophy, v. 77, p. 17-25, 1996.
CRAIG, Edward. Pluralism. Routledge encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2004. v. 14.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086711
FORST, Rainer. Contextos da justiça. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Em defesa da sociedade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.
FRASER. Nancy. Da redistribuição ao reconhecimento? Dilemas da justiça na era pós-socialista. In: SOUZA, Jessé (org.). Democracia hoje. Brasília: Editora UNB, 2001. p. 245-282.
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9133.v15i14-15p231-239
FRASER, Nancy; HONNETH, Axel. Redistribution or recognition? London: Verso, 2003.
GILROY, Paul. The black Atlantic, modernity and double consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
HONNETH, Axel. Luta por reconhecimento. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2003.
HONNETH, Axel. Reconhecimento ou redistribuição? A mudança de perspectiva na ordem moral da sociedade. In: SOUZA, Jessé; MATOS, Patrícia (org.). Teoria crítica no século 21. São Paulo: Annablume, 2007. p. 79-93.
JAEGGI, Rahel. Reconhecimento e subjugação: da relação entre teorias positivas e negativas da intersubjetividade. Sociologias, Porto Alegre, v. 33, p. 120-140, 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-45222013000200005
KYMLICKA, Will. Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0198290918.001.0001
KRITSCH, Raquel; VENTURA, Raissa W. Cuidado, justiça e autonomia: contribuições da teoria política feminista para os debates sobre gênero e democracia. Ivs Fvgit, Valparaíso, v. 21, p. 97-124, 2018.
LUGONES, Maria. Colonialidad y género. Tabula Rasa, Bogotá, v. 9, p. 73-101, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.340
MARKELL, Patchen. Bound by recognition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2003.
MIGNOLO, Walter. Historias locales/diseños globales: colonialidad, conocimientos subalternos y pensamiento fronterizo. Madrid: Akal, 2013.
MIGNOLO, Walter. The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference. The South Atlantic Quarterly, v. 101, n. 1, p. 57-95, 2002.
https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-101-1-57
MOHANTY, Chandra T. Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2: a journal of postmodern literature and culture, New York, v. 2, p. 333-358, 1984.
https://doi.org/10.2307/302821
MOUFFE, Chantal. Feminismo, ciudadanía y política democrática radical. Revista Debate Feminista, Mexico, v. 7, p. 3-22, 1993.
PAREKH, Bhikhu. A new politics of identity: political principles for an interdependent world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00729_35.x
PAREKH, Bhikhu. Integrating minorities. London: Institute of Contemporary Arts, 2001.
PHILLIPS, Anne. Da desigualdade à diferença: um caso grave de deslocamento? Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, n. 2, p. 223-240, jul./dez. 2009.
SIEP, Ludwig. Anerkennung in der Phänomenologie des Geistes und in der heutigen praktischen Philosophie. In: SCHMIDT am BUSCH, Hans-Christoph; ZURN, Christoph F. (orgs.) Anerkennung. Berlin: Akad, 2009. p. 107-124.
https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02093-9/5
SPIVAK, Gayatri. Can the subaltern speak? In: NELSON, Cary; GROSSBERG, Lawrence (org.). Marxism and the interpretation of culture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988. p. 271–316.
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13213-2_84
TAYLOR, Charles. Argumentos filosóficos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2000.
THEUNISSEN, Michael. Selbstverwirklichung und Allgemeinheit. Berlin:
De Gruyter, 1982.
DOI: 10.1515/9783110851069. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851069
WERLE, Denilson; MELO, Rurion S. Introdução: teoria crítica, teorias da justiça e a ‘reatualização’ de Hegel. In: HONNETH, Axel. Sofrimento de indeterminação: uma reatualização da filosofia do direito de Hegel. São Paulo: Esfera Pública, 2007. p. 7-44.
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v0i11p127-140
WILLIG, Rasmus. Recognition and critique: an interview with Judith Butler. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, London, v. 13, p. 139-144, 2012.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2012.648742
YOUNG, Iris M. Categorias desajustadas: uma crítica à teoria dual de sistemas de Nancy Fraser. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, v. 2, p. 193-214, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).
